- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,066
- Reactions
- 12,640
Well in that case, Lamming should sue Morrison also.Yea, but it was the PM who really shafted him and ended his career.
"Of course, I'm bitterly disappointed at two levels – [Scott Morrison] failed to give due process, failed to obtain details of these accusations, looked me in the eye and said that there wasn't a problem and within a day had done a press conference calling me disgraceful," he said.
Former MP Andrew Laming welcomes apology over 'lewd photo' story, criticises Morrison's handling
Former Bowman MP Andrew Laming welcomes an unreserved apology from Nine after he sued the broadcaster for defamation over an award-winning television report aired last year.www.abc.net.au
Personally, if I took a picture of a girl bending over while stacking a fridge at work, I wouldn't be too popular.
The Government was flipped, Scomo is gone for all intents and purposes, so the media is happy until the next saga they want to brew up. Which due to the Queen passing away, is a toss up between the voice to parliament, or the republic.Messy, and as usual, there is more to the saga than meets they eye.
Mick
Well he got caught taking the photo, so of course it wasn't provided to the media.Unfortunately, this incident has little to do with the defamation case.
Laming was accused of online trolling two women in his electorate, and was forced to apologise and go to womens remediation classes.
According to Laming, Scomo shafted him at the press conference after assuring him he had no case to answer.
Laming later withdrew the apologies and came out all guns blazing when the upskirt issue popped up.
Laming suggested in press conference that this whole saga was started by political opponents.
We will probably never know whether the political opponents included the two women.
One thing that has surprised me is that despite all the publicity, the actual photo taken has never surfaced.
Messy, and as usual, there is more to the saga than meets they eye.
Mick
That's an interesting take Knobby.Well he got caught taking the photo, so of course it wasn't provided to the media.
He never planned to post if on social media anyway, it was for his private convenience.
Well why would you post a photo like that Mullokintyre? Particularly as a politician?That's an interesting take Knobby.
You have any evidence for that, or just a gut feel?
Mick
Photo like what?Well why would you post a photo like that Mullokintyre? Particularly as a politician?
It wasn't upskirting so Nine went too far and has had to pay up.
He said he did it as a joke. It's just that the girl and the other people who saw him take the photo didn't think it was funny.Photo like what?
Photo like what?
According to the media the photo showed the girl kneeling filling a fridge with cans and the top of her undies were showing.
We don't know how much was showing, we don't know if the said undies were the centre of the shot, or if they were peripheral.
Laming took the photo in full few of quite a few people, not the sort of shot you are going to ferret away to wank over .
You are drawing the same conclusions that got all the others in trouble without any sort of proof to back it up.
Mick
It looks like it is a toss up at the moment, whether the media are going to gang tackle Lowe from the reserve bank, or Thorburn from the Church, I think Thorburn looks as though he has more legs.The Government was flipped, Scomo is gone for all intents and purposes, so the media is happy until the next saga they want to brew up. Which due to the Queen passing away, is a toss up between the voice to parliament, or the republic.
Time will tell, but at the moment the media don't seem to have a target or a person, they have singled out for their undivided attention.
Serena has retired, so that takes the heat off Margaret Court, the Libs have been kicked that far into touch, they lack the front page punch and Albo is saying all the right things so they seem to be a bit lost for a headline.
Once Elizabeth is buried and Harry and Megan have gone home, the media will be at a loose end, so then we should get an indication of the next victim I mean story.
Unfortunately, this article continues one of the myths about climate change that really drives me nuts.Ocean ecosystems are in even greater trouble, hammered by a combination of industrial fishing, pollution, and acidification, as carbon dioxide dissolves into seawater. Forests, rivers, wetlands, savannahs, the cryosphere (the world’s ice and snow) – all are being pushed towards the brink. And above all, climate breakdown is gathering at shocking, unanticipated speed, with disasters occurring at 1.2C of heating that scientists did not expect until we hit 2 or 3C.
Earth is under threat, yet you would scarcely know it | George Monbiot
Unlike most of the media, the Guardian resists political or commercial influence in order to keep the climate crisis front and centrewww.theguardian.com
So if the ocean Ph is 8.1, its basic, not acidic.In the 200-plus years since the industrial revolution began, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere has increased due to human actions. During this time, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. The ocean’s average pH is now around 8.1
MickAnother anomaly is the Indian Ocean, which is about 10 percent more acidic than the Atlantic or Pacific. The exact reason why is a scientific mystery but perhaps it is because it is the most isolated sea, dominated by monsoon rains and river drainage rather than ocean currents mixing the waters, Takahashi suggests.
I suggest that this was the most salient point from that story SP.although they warn the reef’s recovery could be swiftly undone by global warming.
I think the most salient point, is it is mostly guess work.I suggest that this was the most salient point from that story SP.
Yep its great that parts of Great Barrier Reef have (seemingly )recovered. But repeated bleachings from extreme water temperatures do weaken and ultimately will destroy the reef.
There was another more nuanced article on the condition of the Great Barrier Reef. Well worth checking out in full IMV
On a remote Australian island, a small patch of reef is as good as scientists have ever seen it
The coral reef at Lizard Island, 270 kilometres north of Cairns, has been hit by four mass bleaching events in six years. Marine biologists are hopeful about its future, but much scepticism remains about its long-term survival.www.smh.com.au
I was diving a long way out from one of the islands and hit a hot current of water. It was that hot it felt like I was being close to boiled.I suggest that this was the most salient point from that story SP.
Yep its great that parts of Great Barrier Reef have (seemingly )recovered. But repeated bleachings from extreme water temperatures do weaken and ultimately will destroy the reef.
There was another more nuanced article on the condition of the Great Barrier Reef. Well worth checking out in full IMV
On a remote Australian island, a small patch of reef is as good as scientists have ever seen it
The coral reef at Lizard Island, 270 kilometres north of Cairns, has been hit by four mass bleaching events in six years. Marine biologists are hopeful about its future, but much scepticism remains about its long-term survival.www.smh.com.au
Whats the "guess work " SP ? That climate change isn't necessarily happening ? That we don't know exactly hot hot it is going to get ? Or that we don't know exactly when ecosystems will break down as a result of the relentless warming ?I think the most salient point, is it is mostly guess work.
No, how coral will react to global warming.Whats the "guess work " SP ? That climate change isn't necessarily happening ? That we don't know exactly hot hot it is going to get ? Or that we don't know exactly when ecosystems will break down as a result of the relentless warming ?
I suggest the overwhelming evidence of CC and its effects to date are a bit more than guess work.
No, how coral will react to global warming.
We arent talking about global warming we are talking about its effect on the barrier reef.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?