- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 28,097
- Reactions
- 25,302
I have in mind a much more elaborate solution......Interesting article on the Northern Territories problems.
Renewable target scrapped as CLP goes all in on ageing gas plant, and is warned of blackout risks
New CLP government scraps Labor’s 50 pct renewables target, but its focus on gas may leave it exposed to the blackouts it warns from the switch to solar.reneweconomy.com.au
Another effort and in 15y, the following headlines will follow:Decisions, decisions.
FRANKFURT, March 5 (Reuters) - Germany's nuclear engineering lobby on Wednesday said up to half a dozen nuclear power stations could in theory be reopened despite closing in 2023 as a result of Berlin's decision to exit nuclear power, as the next government looks to secure cheaper energy.
Germany's conservatives, winners of the February election, said resuming nuclear power generation was an option to tackle high power prices and rising dependency on electricity imports, most notably from nuclear-reliant France.
The operators of the nuclear plants said, however, their closure was final.
Members of the nuclear technology lobby group include subsidiaries of Westinghouse and Framatome as well as part-German owned nuclear engineering services company Nukem (RWEG.DE), opens new tab(EONGn.DE), opens new tab.
"The recommissioning of up to six nuclear power plants is technically possible...The quicker the decision is made, the less money it costs and the sooner the baseload-securing, climate-friendly plants can rejoin the grid," the KernD group said in a statement.
Investment of between 1 and 3 billion euros ($1.07-3.21 billion) per station could pay for recommissioning, it added.
The statement came a day after the German parties hoping to form the country's next government agreed to create a 500 billion euro infrastructure fund and overhaul borrowing rules in a tectonic spending shift to revamp the military and revive growth in Europe's largest economy.
KernD said the operational costs of existing nuclear assets to be reopened would be competitive and the plants worked independently of the weather. Renewable power output was reduced for weeks last year due to adverse weather.
Germany also aims to phase out coal burning in coming years.
As of 2024, Germany has 48 coal power plants.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
- Total Coal Power Plants: Germany has a total of 48 coal power plants.
- Phase-out Target: Germany aims to phase out coal power by the end of the decade.
The actual quote will probably be, Germany has asked China if they can borrow 100billion, to reopen power stations.Another effort and in 15y, the following headlines will follow:
"up to 40 coal power stations could in theory be reopened despite closing in the 2020s"
With a cost of only 100 billions to recommission, this could allow Germany to end the rolling blackouts which have been plaguing its cities in the increasing colder winters....ROL
And currently blowing budget to carry on the war.The actual quote will probably be, Germany has asked China if they can borrow 100billion, to reopen power stations.
As they don't have the money, because they have spent it all buying solar panels, wind generators and batteries from China and they need replacing.
Yes it certainly gives they impression that it is all or nothing mentality, the next couple of years will be interesting, trying to grow the manufacturing base while struggling with energy available to do it, will be a challenge.And currently blowing budget to carry on the war.
Germany is a good example on how energy is able to make or break a country.
So unbiasedThis article gives a good summary of high renewable penetration in the Texas grid.
Solar, wind and batteries set records in Texas as thermal plants the size of Australia’s entire coal fleet sit idle
A thermal fleet the size of Australia’s entire coal generation fleet has been offline in Texas. Time for solar, wind and batteries to step forward.reneweconomy.com.au
I thought the graph was great, it gave a terrific visual indication of where base load fits into the picture, it is very consistant along the base of the graph.So unbiased
Please note it is spring time low usage period which is why planned maintenance is on:I thought the graph was great, it gave a terrific visual indication of where base load fits into the picture, it is very consistant along the base of the graph.
In the Texas graph, the base load is covered by nuclear and fossil fuel, whereas the peaking is more suited to the renewables and storage, just plain common sense really.
To try and make the yellow and dark green part of the graph large enough to remove all the other colours and replace them with mainly purple will be very difficult IMO
That's what I was alluding to, even though it is an optimum day for renewables output, with maximum solar and wind, there is still a huge amount of gas,coal and nuclear displayed on the graph.Please note it is spring time low usage period which is why planned maintenance is on:
Low demand , max solar wind output.
I would guess a 20th of august or 20th of January would be radically different..we bet?
That's the bit most seem to really struggle with.There will be days that have a lot less wind and solar generation than the day shown in the graph
It's crazy stuff, I'm going to a catchup with ex workmates on Monday.That's the bit most seem to really struggle with.
Not from Texas but closer to home this chart for WA (specifically the SWIS which for those unfamiliar is south-west WA including Perth) shows the problem clearly.
Total daily output from wind and solar. Resolution is daily and covers the past 12 months:
View attachment 196325
Pretty easy to make it work on the 10th of December but a lot harder on the 11th of June.
With the added problem that days of low output are not always but are commonly cool enough that some heating would be used meaning higher consumption. Also likely to be more people inside, more use of clothes dryers and so on too on those days.
That's what sends engineers running for the hills, literally so. Because with present technology hydro's the standout method when it comes to storing energy. The key is finding sites that don't just work but which are economic to develop - that latter bit kills off most of them.
Thats not the end of it. As EVs become more popular you will be slugged by governments to replace fuel excise.It's crazy stuff, I'm going to a catchup with ex workmates on Monday.
It will be interesting to get up to speed on the gossip, most of them are still working, so it is always interesting.
On a side note, I'm really pizzed because the shopping centre which had free EV charging, has started to charge for use.
I mean after two years of free charging I'm pizzed, where are the loonies when I need them, I'm green I'm keen. Lol
Unrelated but you've just reminded me of a certain bus company that used to run their buses on heating oil.On a side note, I'm really pizzed because the shopping centre which had free EV charging, has started to charge for use.
perfectly good reason for the federal government to just acquire them.The ruler being run over more Aussie processes.
Owner of ‘uneconomical’ Port Pirie and Hobart smelters calls for government help to stay afloat
The operator of smelters in South Australia and Tasmania is urging state and federal governments to provide "essential" financial support, after its facilities were described as "uncompetitive assets".www.abc.net.au
The owner of the Port Pirie and Hobart smelters has put its hand out for government assistance, casting doubt over the future of the major employers if taxpayer-funded help isn't forthcoming.
Nyrstar, which employs more than 1,300 people across its Tasmanian and South Australian operations, said it was talking to the federal and state governments about the "severity of the challenges it faces".
The company owns the Port Pirie lead smelter and Hobart zinc smelter.
The Port Pirie smelter processes and refines lead, silver, zinc fume, copper matte and by-products such as sulphuric acid, according to Nyrstar.
The Hobart smelter produces zinc and other by-products, including copper sulphate, cadmium, gypsum and sulphuric acid.
Earlier this week, it was revealed plans for a $750 million green hydrogen facility at the Port Pirie smelter had been shelved.
The plans, which were announced in 2021, "never proceeded beyond feasibility", an SA government spokesperson said.
I wonder how many projects have been shut down because they are not "internationally competitive" ?The ruler being run over more Aussie processes.
Owner of ‘uneconomical’ Port Pirie and Hobart smelters calls for government help to stay afloat
The operator of smelters in South Australia and Tasmania is urging state and federal governments to provide "essential" financial support, after its facilities were described as "uncompetitive assets".www.abc.net.au
The owner of the Port Pirie and Hobart smelters has put its hand out for government assistance, casting doubt over the future of the major employers if taxpayer-funded help isn't forthcoming.
Nyrstar, which employs more than 1,300 people across its Tasmanian and South Australian operations, said it was talking to the federal and state governments about the "severity of the challenges it faces".
The company owns the Port Pirie lead smelter and Hobart zinc smelter.
The Port Pirie smelter processes and refines lead, silver, zinc fume, copper matte and by-products such as sulphuric acid, according to Nyrstar.
The Hobart smelter produces zinc and other by-products, including copper sulphate, cadmium, gypsum and sulphuric acid.
Earlier this week, it was revealed plans for a $750 million green hydrogen facility at the Port Pirie smelter had been shelved.
The plans, which were announced in 2021, "never proceeded beyond feasibility", an SA government spokesperson said.
And we all know these are a direct consequences of our energy price aka mismanagement and fairy land dreamingI wonder how many projects have been shut down because they are not "internationally competitive" ?
We need to evaluate our own needs and assess the reliability of our supply lines and consider if national sovereignty is worth the price of subsiding such operations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?