- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,336
- Reactions
- 17,640
Smurf,Just thought I'd mention a project I'm evaluating at the moment. This is a purely personal one, not work related, and involves building a solar-electric space heater.
My intent is to get this up and running and put it into actual use at home, located in the second living area off the kitchen which is semi-open plan to the lounge and dining also.
Thus far I've got as far as a desktop evaluation of the economics (it stacks up well enough to warrant proceeding further with) and have compiled estimated daily heat production data going back 3 years. Next step is to analyze that data in further detail and assuming it's all good then go about sourcing components for the system.
Initial estimates is that I can get everything required and get it up and running for not more than $1000 (valuing my own labour as free) and that the system will produce about 1.7 MWh of useful heat per annum (potential gross output is considerably greater but this figure is for useful heat delivered when the sun isn't shining - it's a storage based system).
The system will draw zero power from the grid to produce heat, it will be 100% solar, and will only use grid power to operate the heat release mechanism with grid power consumption being equivalent to less than 1% of the heat produced.
This is a long term project with a target commissioning date of 1 March 2019. Reason for that is purely economic (presently receiving 28.283c FIT until 31 December 2018 so no point doing it earlier).
I'm not inventing anything here, just combining proven off the shelf concepts and commercially available products into a working solar heating system. Will post some more at some time when I've got further with it.
Smurf,
I assume you are aware and probably a suscriber to Renew?
Just in case you are not, you might find interesting articles around that subject
Well smurph, it sounds as though t.o.d pricing is coming to W.A.
Also a higher supply charge to seems to go with the trail.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/32487480/will-this-trial-mean-you-pay-more-for-power/#page1
A potentially controversial aspect of the trial will result in households paying more to be connected to the grid to reflect the big cost of the power plants, poles and wires needed to supply electricity.
the link looks as though it has been taken down.
Energy storage: how an abandoned goldmine will be converted into a world first
Australia has no plan for managing disused mines but a company has a novel solution for producing renewable energy
A different form of energy conversion, very interesting.
Would like to know the end cost per litre though.
Facility to convert non-recyclable plastic to fuel planned for Canberra
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-12/plastic-to-fuel-facility-planned-in-canberra/7835234
cost of diesel produced should include the waste management avoided and probably a premium for the "crap removed from earth"Very clever. One of the bottom lines is the cost of the diesel that is produced. Bit it would also be interesting to see how much "rubbish" plastic can be taken out the waste stream and recycled.
Australia's solar power production to triple with 12 new plants to be built
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-...-triple-with-12-new-plants-beingbuilt/7826302
The problem in SA was simple economics at work.
Loss of most interconnection to other states combined with lack of wind generation gave the gas-fired generators the opportunity to make a huge profit and so that's what they did.
If someone doesn't like that outcome then moving from a market based system to regulation or public ownership would be the obvious answers. So long as there's a competitive market in an industry where every player is at times guaranteed to sell their product there will be price spikes to extreme levels.
Same with anything really. If you're guaranteed to sell your product then you can put the price up and most will do so. And the nature of power generation is such that, with present technologies, there's always going to be times when such certainty of finding a buyer exists such that the only real alternatives involve something other than a free market approach.
Don'y worry about lack of foresight, in battery technology, it is the 'holy grail' there is billions of dollars going into battery research.
It is one area, the Government doesn't need to spend money, the private sector want to crack this one.
Whomever comes up with the viable battery, will be worth trillions.
That's a post from page 5 of this thread, and guess what the CSIRO is coming to the fore, go Aussie.
Store year's worth of power in Hydro Tasmania dams to prevent another energy crisis, industry says
By Richard Baines
Tasmania's biggest power users want 12 months' worth of power stored in Hydro dams, after an unprecedented crisis earlier this year.
In a highly critical submission to the state's Energy Security Taskforce, the Minerals and Energy Council suggested increased power storage was the key to energy security going forward.
The taskforce was set up after record-low levels at power-generating dams combined with a broken undersea Basslink power cable to plunge Tasmania into an unprecedented energy crisis earlier this year.
The Minerals and Energy Council, which represents big industrial power users, wants 12 months' worth of storage in future.
"Build storages such that the 'normal' lower limit [prior to autumn/winter rains] still has a minimum 12-month reserve about the lower practical limit," the submission said.
"Limit 'power export' via Basslink in order to build storages to an effectively safe minimum ”” in line with targets and milestones."
In a statement, Hydro Tasmania's chief executive Steve Davy said the government business was working on storage while the taskforce considered its 31 stakeholder submissions.
"While the taskforce considers that new evidence, Hydro Tasmania is applying additional conservatism to storage management," he said.
"We're also taking interim steps to further enhance our climate modelling and planning assumptions."
Mr Davy said "overreacting" to the energy crisis "could be very expensive for Tasmanians".
The problem in SA was simple economics at work.
Loss of most interconnection to other states combined with lack of wind generation gave the gas-fired generators the opportunity to make a huge profit and so that's what they did.
If someone doesn't like that outcome then moving from a market based system to regulation or public ownership would be the obvious answers. So long as there's a competitive market in an industry where every player is at times guaranteed to sell their product there will be price spikes to extreme levels.
Same with anything really. If you're guaranteed to sell your product then you can put the price up and most will do so. And the nature of power generation is such that, with present technologies, there's always going to be times when such certainty of finding a buyer exists such that the only real alternatives involve something other than a free market approach.
Looks like S.A power problems, will be front and centre, soon.
Can't wait to see the outcome of this fiasco.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-28/sa-weather-south-australia-without-power-as-storm-hits/7885930
If S.A is going to be cut off completely everytime there is a large storm, it will become very annoying.IMO
Obviously too much wind for the wind farms. I wonder why the gas plant can't be in service, unless there is a distribution issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?