The Bolt Report

[banco]

He's basically a performance artist. I don't think he's actually an idelogue. He just plays one on TV.

 

[IFocus]

Its only a very small response to the other Labor advertising spots dumbing down the nation with political ineptness and national bankruptcy that are shown on the ABC and SBS!

Again parrot fashion that you hear from the US about media bias if you show any signs of having a pulse you're a screaming Commo.

Politics has moved so far to the right these days

 

[noco]

Oh great another Liberal advertising spot dumbing down the nation with political vile and venom just like the US.

Not only are the USA laughing our this Green/Labor socialist goverment of Australia, the UK has got into the act as well.

They must also know we have an absolute clown in one Bill Shorten. Check out the link below.



http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermail/andrewbolt/index.php/couriermail/comments/sir_les_shorten/

 

[IFocus]

When Abbott gets in the world will really have some thing to laugh about

 

[sails]

When Abbott gets in the world will really have some thing to laugh about

For any mistakes Abbott has made, I don't think they have ever travelled so far as Shorten's...lol

And Shorten isn't even a leader...

Must be dissapointing when one of your own performs worse than Abbott...

 

[wayneL]

Politics has moved so far to the right these days

Ya reckon???

Maybe you've just moved so far to the left?

 

[sails]

For any mistakes Abbott has made, I don't think they have ever travelled so far as Shorten's...lol

And Shorten isn't even a leader...

Must be dissapointing when one of your own performs worse than Abbott...

Here you go, IF. A few links which show just how much worse Shorten is than Abbott. To the best of my knowledge, the occasional digs lefties have had at Abbott never reached these papers:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...nister-takes-brown-nosing-to-a-new-level.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...es-with-PM-without-knowing-what-she-said.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/27/bill-shorten_n_1459923.html

 

[sails]

Here you go, IF. A few links which show just how much worse Shorten is than Abbott. To the best of my knowledge, the occasional digs lefties have had at Abbott never reached these papers:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...nister-takes-brown-nosing-to-a-new-level.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...es-with-PM-without-knowing-what-she-said.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/27/bill-shorten_n_1459923.html

And here's another where The UK Spectator has called Shorten's interview as "Interview of the year"

http://www.spectator.co.uk/alexmassie/7810535/the-interview-of-the-year.thtml

Now what was that about Abbott, IFocus?
Did you know that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones?

 

[drsmith]

Labor doesn't have to worry about its glass house.

It's been shattered from within.

 

[IFocus]

Ya reckon???

Maybe you've just moved so far to the left?

On social issues I have always been by any measure of the Coalition posters on ASF extreme left.

But as the wealth of our nation increases most get lazy until you get a "work choices moment" .

 

[MrBurns]

On social issues I have always been by any measure of the Coalition posters on ASF extreme left.

But as the wealth of our nation increases most get lazy until you get a "work choices moment" .

I didnt see anything wrong with Work Choices, so the boss can give you the sack, so what, surely you cant expect someone to keep you on if they don't need/want you.

 

[sails]

I didnt see anything wrong with Work Choices, so the boss can give you the sack, so what, surely you cant expect someone to keep you on if they don't need/want you.

And, not only that, but Gillard's FWA has a clause that says a boss is guilty of any sexual harrasement claims until he/she proves him/herself innocent...

Trouble for Gillard is that it might have backfired now on to Slipper. I think she only intended it for those nasty bosses who happen to provide people with work...

s. 361 Reason for action to be presumed unless proved otherwise

(1) If:

(a) in an application in relation to a contravention of this Part, it is alleged that a person took, or is taking, action for a particular reason or with a particular intent; and

(b) taking that action for that reason or with that intent would constitute a contravention of this Part;

it is presumed, in proceedings arising from the application, that the action was, or is being, taken for that reason or with that intent, unless the person proves otherwise.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to orders for an interim injunction

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...slipper_assumed_guilty_under_labors_laws/P20/

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fwa2009114/s361.html

http://www.deewr.gov.au/WorkplaceRe...view/Documents/ConfederationofACTIndustry.pdf

 

[IFocus]

I didnt see anything wrong with Work Choices, so the boss can give you the sack, so what, surely you cant expect someone to keep you on if they don't need/want you.

Australia voted on Work non Choices and decided it was bad and for good reason.

I see Abbott is talking up shooting trade unions which is a wink and nod it all coming back but no doubt called some thing else so I guess round 2 has started.

Shame I have seen 1st hand the uncertainty and fear WnC created in the lower ranks it was horrible.

 

[sails]

Australia voted on Work non Choices and decided it was bad and for good reason.

I see Abbott is talking up shooting trade unions which is a wink and nod it all coming back but no doubt called some thing else so I guess round 2 has started.

Shame I have seen 1st hand the uncertainty and fear WnC created in the lower ranks it was horrible.

IF, "Fair Work" seems anything BUT fair. The pendulum has swung too far the other way and will discourage people from running businesses and employing people, imo.

Even though I think Work Choices went a bit too far the other way, there was also a lot of scaremongering going on over Work Choices and I see you are still at it...LOL

I was an employer before Work Choices, and I can tell you it was ridiculous then. We were unable to turn a profit (and I worked for nothing for several years while employees got all their entitlements). I can only imagine how dreadful it must be for employers now under FWA especially with this presumption of guilt that I posted earlier at ASF today.

 

[wayneL]

Shame I have seen 1st hand the uncertainty and fear WnC created in the lower ranks it was horrible.

I guess about as much uncertainty as those who've risked it all and started a business... and employed those people.

 

[Calliope]

It should't be hard for Ms Gillard and her Green partners to manufacture millions of green jobs out of thin air, if she adopts the Obama definition of a green job. Saw this little gem on the Bolt report this morning.



http://news.thomasnet.com/green_clean/2012/06/14/good-news-you-have-a-green-job/

 

[orr]

This speaks volumes, of sense, As opposed to bolt

http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/07/12/all-media-outlets-are-now-under-severe-pressure/

 

[MrBurns]

This speaks volumes, of sense, As opposed to bolt

http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/07/12/all-media-outlets-are-now-under-severe-pressure/

Crikey is so left wing it could be run by the ABC.....I take no notice of it, subscribed once and the forums were worse than Q and A.

 

[joea]

This is from Alan Jones.

http://www.2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=13667

Hopefully it has not been posted before.
joea

 

[sptrawler]

Bolt needs to engage in meaningfull debate, not just pick a topic and hammer the poor bugger who disagrees.
I personally can't watch the show, it is just a case of preaching to the converted a bit like watching the morning show on ABC24, in reverse.
I would like one of the channels, to report unbiased information.