This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Albanese government

Who is going to be the first to try and knife Airbus next year?

  • Marles

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Chalmers

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Wong

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • Plibersek

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Shorten

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Burney

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 16.7%

  • Total voters
    12
The reasoning seems pretty sound. Over 55's are much less likely to get jobs than younger people. I'd like to see longer term young unemployed in training programs, its their best chance if they really want a job.
Age discrimination is one area where I'd really like to see government crackdown hard on business.

If someone's in good health then it shouldn't be a reason to not give them the job.
 
Bill starting to apply the brakes, 8% spending cut, that's magic.


A crackdown on prices and junk therapies will be part of a new federal effort to save billions of dollars on disability services and achieve a controversial target of 8 per cent spending growth without cuts to eligibility for Australians who need support.

The federal government wants to use its buying power to drive down prices from suppliers – such as by negotiating bulk discounts on wheelchair purchases – that are blamed in part for pushing up the cost of the $35 billion National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), which is growing at almost 14 per cent a year.
NDIS Minister Bill Shorten outlined the plans in an exclusive interview that included a key assurance that he would not be changing the eligibility for the scheme as part of his plan to meet the long-term 8 per cent spending target, which he insists is not a cap.
 

I don't know exactly what is covered by the NDIS but it seems to me it should only be essential items like wheelchairs, and homecare services and surely a 'basis price' could be specified and if the client wants more they pay for it.

Just saying they want something and sending the bill to the taxpayer is ripe for the ripoff merchants.
 
A potential client of NDIS applies for funding after being assessed by medical folk.

It then depends who they get at the interview and how articulate their advocate is just how much they get.

There are no fixed guidelines (AFA my wife knows) as to how much money each problem receives.

As an example I read of an accountant in Sydney who said that I am a paraplegic, I have my own business and am quite capable of earning a living.

I asked for assistance for a new wheelchair and to make minor renos at home, I was given $600k pa

I know of people caring for quadraplegics requiring 24/7 care, who have been given $120k pa

He is agitating for some sort of recognised scale of disability and funding.

It is obvious that there needs to be a registry of suppliers and what carers can expect to pay for the specialised equipment that is often required.

I feel they should be funded to a level that allows them to live a middle income style of life, they should not be funded to live a life like the wealthy.

Being driven 60ks each way by a carer for a personalised 1 hr drum lesson is just one of the extravagances that I have heard of.

There are cuts that could be made or better still, more finely tuned assistance for those who really do need it.

I will say that some of the pressures that carers are under is quite heart wrenching to witness.
 
Well it looks like Albo is reversing a decision that wasn't popular in Julia's reign.


Financial support for single parents will continue until their youngest dependent child turns 14, partly reversing a cut to the payment made by the Gillard government more than a decade ago.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed the lift from eight to 14 would be included in tomorrow's federal budget
 
We are all winners, the subs are now funded, without a post script from the media about how upset the French are and how we are terrible for cancelling the diesel subs.
We are cutting the cost of the NDIS, without the media ranting about it being an attack on the disabled.
There is a tax cut coming for the rich next year.
Single mums are getting the child allowance back up a bit.
Where are the losers?
Everyone's a winner.
 
Viva la revolución
 
So a young woman can go out on the town a few times, produce offspring of unknown paternity and get 14 years of government support? Do it again as the child turns 12 or 13... then all good on the gravy train for another 14 years?? Then perhaps get on disability pension for offensively morbid obesity, or social anxiety, wotevs - with maybe some NDIS assistance. Even on Jobseeker will likely never be offered a job due to zero experience. Then old age pension time kicks in, regardless.
 
Yep the system just keeps giving and the ones who go to work are the lucky ones, not only do they fund the system, they get to pay for their own pension.

Overall it is a pretty good budget IMO, no stupid brain fart ideas and a measured approach to spending.
 
Last edited:
I don't think that anyone is surprised.

 
i have not seen to much commentary from the experts and the economists about the expansionary nature of this budget.
The vast majority of the funding is going to go to people who will consume it rather than invest it in any asset class.
So will these measure put more pressure on inflation?
How do the RBA mandarins see it all?
One other thing i noted, was that after blaming big business for causing inflationary problems by inflating their profits at the expense of everyone else, one of the underlying reasons why OZ went into "surplus" was the unexpectedly large increase in revenue from company tax,.

It was also helped as well with higher paye tax intake from more people working, plus lower unemployment benefits.
The forward estimates do not seem to forecast these three items continuing to assist the bottom line, hence the forecast large deficits over the cycle.

Mick
 
Jim needs to be careful, he didn't cut Phillip Lowe much slack, when he used the Ukraine war as an excuse for the RBA interest rates rising before 2024. ? ?
Didn't he call for an investigation into the operation of the RBA. ?

Promise to reduce power bills by $275 made before Ukraine war: Chalmers​

ByPaul Sakkal​

The government’s commitment to reduce power bills by an average of $275 was made before the war in Ukraine changed global energy prices, the treasurer has said.
Jim Chalmers was asked at the National Press Club in Canberra whether he would re-affirm Labor’s election pledge to reduce bills by 2025.

“[It] was a forecast for modelling that was done before the Ukraine war and there have been developments in the energy market since then,” he said.
 
AHHH yes, the models.
So reliable.
Until they aren't.
Unless of course the models are headed by James Freud and backed up by Kate Cebrano.

Mick
 
I'll be curious what the figures are like after they've been confirmed when the adjustments are made.

When the corrected budget statement is posted in a few months I suspect that surplus will disappear
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...