Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,392
- Reactions
- 11,783
You're still at Uni, right? And never traded? Been banned on some other forum? The name's kennas, please ditch the y. Cheers.Golly geepers kenny, eat me..
As for technical analysis, sure, a lot of it is bunk, it has to be. But the challenge is to find a unique approach that works for you.
. If you are already set in your perspectives and paradigm, what’s the point of ramming an inflexible view around the net. Maybe a bit of stirring, but that’s about it.
Classici couldnt care less what other peole think..
I can't believe how much band width this has taken up.
Classic, why post?
onemind,Thanks Mag.
But why patronize me? I have read the books you have read. Van Tharpe, wizards and all the rest of them. I have searched many many forums and read tons of threads. I have posted on many foums and asked tons of questions. I have paper traded stocks, forex, futures.. I have did the maths, stayed up late with excel, metastock, tradesim and many other apps. I have written my own software..
The list goes on and on and on..
I didnt come to my conclusions lightly.
Personally i find all the psychology stuff so cliche. If i hear the word psychology one more time i will eat my laptop. Thats all you ever hear on forums. Every wise guy reading star charts telling you that psychology is 80% and money management is 90%.
Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,Psychology, money management, psychology, money management,
I get it i get it. I have read the same blogs as you. I have paper traded for large profit. I have turned a $500 real money forex account to $1230 in 1 week and lost the lot in the next 2 days.
All i have learned has led me to random walk and the falsification of technical indicators.
You guys just seem to find my conclusion premature, immature, unexperienced and feel the need to patronise me over and over until i agree with your views because then of course i would be right if i thought like you.
The bottom line is, i dont think like you. I think gann was a kook. I think most of t/a is astrology and my new approach to trading is more realistic, more business like and more in line with the big players who succeed ultimately in this game.
So again, thanks for actually trying to post something positive to me after all your put downs, appreciate it. But again, to each their own..
-----
Golly geepers kenny, eat me..
Spot on Kennas!Classic, why post?
Well, I hope you learn something here. I certainly have! And congratulations on getting the best minds on the forum to respond to you: WayneL, Professor Fink, tech/a, Magdoran, markaumau, chops, stox....sorry to have missed anyone. You've obviously stirred something up. Now, the manged funds I recommend are.....It means i couldnt care less if other people agree with my view or not. I post to learn..
I cant be fegged wasting my time with yet another pedantic, patronising trading legend wannabe..
WayneL, Professor Fink, tech/a, Magdoran, markaumau, chops, stox....
and my new approach to trading is more realistic, more business like and more in line with the big players who succeed ultimately in this game.
Hi kennas,You're still at Uni, right? And never traded? Been banned on some other forum? The name's kennas, please ditch the y. Cheers.
I can't believe how much band width this has taken up.
onemind,snore..
I'm done with this forum.
Best minds? There are better on the net..
I will leave now before you read my star sign.
Happy trading
Oddly enough controversy can generate interesting responses, and perspectives. A person putting up a radical/unorthodox view can stimulate some unique responses, but it’s probably better when the person is like the Duc in my view…Mag
Trolls need to be fed, without feeding they shrivel up and go away.“troll”
Glad you like it
Hopefully you got something useful out of it.
If you are interested, I posted the same thing on other forums. One forex and one commodities just to see the different perspectives of traders on other markets.
Here is the forex one: http://www2.oanda.com/cgi-bin/msgboard/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=16;t=008339;p=1
And i'll have to look the other one up in a sec.
Its interesting to note that most of the forex traders were in agreement, a little less were in commodities and a lot were against it in stocks as demonstrated
I think the reason for this is because the forex is probably the closest thing on the planet to perfect competition with its liquidity and 2 trillion dollar size making this stuff obvious to forex traders. Next the commodities like wheat ect have price takers and again are pretty close to perfect competition but with things like weather and government trade polocies ect having its effects leads some traders to dispute my random theories. Lastly, the stock traders are adamant that there are repeatable patterns, especially in ASX because of its tiny size and the ablity of investors to know more about companies etc leads them to believe in even bigger inefficiencies that supposeddly show up in the price charts which they think they can exploit. Which is ironic considering the book used stock data.
P.S Here is a link on an obscure forum just to see what the king of forex backtesters had to say about it:http://forum.forexsb.com/viewtopic.php?pid=391#p391
It will be interesting to see what these guys say
I think I have been pretty thorough and have got a lot closer to cracking this nut
Have fun..
Trolls need to be fed, without feeding they shrivel up and go away.
Choice is ours (other members of ASF) to feed or not. Let's see.
Now you are just being funny..
Actually, it shouldn't really matter whether he is a troll or not, that is entirely irrelevent.
What should matter is that if he is in point of fact incorrect, that you should be able to demonstrate with a logical, coherent argument and demonstration that he is in point of fact incorrect.
The claim is a *random walk*.
This should be easily shown to be *misguided* and the factors that underlie the *proof* demonstrated via referenced material & evidence.
coherent argument and demonstration that he is in point of fact incorrect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?