you would think so , but currency rates are totally manipulated , and currencies backed by promises from an untrustworthy entity are essentially worthless$450 Billion was contributed to the $3.35 Trillion superannuation giant for fiscal year 30 June 2021.
28% of it has already found a home in overseas equities .Foreign assets to domestic ones now sit at about 20%. For the past 3 years, the dividend flow back to OZ has far exceeded the payout to foreigners who have shares in our stock market.
Downside to this though, is the interest paid out by government and aussie banks to foreign bond holders. Still, that overseas savings pot is only gonna get bigger over time and is sure to eventually give some heft to the $A .
You will notice recently a strong set of changes in life policies access, terms of those and limited payments..Not exactly about superannuation but the cash cow aspect is from an income insurance perspective in superannuation. This applies from today in super funds it seems.
Policies are subject to reassessment after 5 years. These changes will allow insurers to alter terms or decline cover after 5 years.
So it appears if a member is unable to work from, say, age 40, your income is for five years not until you reach 65, there is no automatic renewal after five years and the insurance company can change the T&C's.
Significant changes to Income Protection policies come into place from Friday, 1 October 2021 - Pitcher Partners
In the face of increasing losses and concerns of the financial sustainability of insurers, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has required insurers to commit to several changes to income protection products as of October 1st, 2021.www.pitcher.com.au
How about revisiting what said in 2012 ?Soon after coming to office in 1996, the Howard Government introduced a superannuation surcharge for contributions from higher income earners. It's reintroduction is currently off the agenda (according to The Australian), but Labor is currently considering the following measures (below, again from The Australian).
Linking the contributions tax to a worker's marginal income tax rate would, in effect, be the same as the Coalition's surcharge, but Labor may go further, hitting income from super as well.
The Government of the day IMO will have three options regarding the tax on super in the pension phase, as it is interconnected with the old age pension.How about revisiting what said in 2012 ?
Yes if it was only me, I would cash in and buy the McMansion and enjoy the perks of life, the other half would rather live in a cave and eat road kill, than go to centrelink. ?more likely we will still be in lock-down , and the FIFO workers will be doing all the work while the locals will be sitting in front of the Tube ( TV or U-Tube ) slurping on a tinnie ( 'cos the wine will all be exported to the Northern Hemisphere )
found a reason to liquidate my super in 2010 and haven't regretted it for a second
3.3 trillion is a fair slice of money looking for a home.Union-aligned super funds got $ 4.5 Billion worth of inflows for the June 1/4. ( plus $ 18 Bill. member contributions )
Industry funds now hold $ 872 Billion in assets, up 23% over the year.
For the first time since September 2,016, the Retail super sector enjoyed a net $0.3 Bill. inflow as more members joined up than exited for other ( probably Union and Not-for-profits ) sectors.
The 3.3Trillion savings pool appears to be outgrowing the local sharemarket. Just 37% of it is now local, down from 45% , 8 years ago.
The 10 biggest super funds could hold 80% of superannuation assets by 2,025. Rainmaker predicts the the 5 biggest will all be Industry funds by then, too: Australian Super , Aware Super, Uni Super , Host Plus , and Q Super/ SunSuper .
Depends on which politicians are in power/who's donating to the liberal party.3.3 trillion is a fair slice of money looking for a home.
How long will it be before the Super funds start to turn the tables on the banks and swallow one of them up?
BOQ and BEN are capitalised at 5 and 6 billion respectively.
Pocket money for the Union funds.
Housing mortgages would be a very nice substitute for the superfunds to have funds invested in.
Mick
Boomers are getting old, I think you are right about them having too much money, the last thing that the Country needs is all that money transferred to the next generation, the whole workforce will have to be brought in from overseas.Dunno about that. I reckon we might have the whole "We need the coalition's superior economic management to get us out of this thing and start rebuilding the economy" or some such drivel.
Too many boomers with too much in their super funds and investment properties.
Yeah, inheritance tax is one of the very few things that they won't have a hope of passing on account of housing costs etc.Boomers are getting old, I think you are right about them having too much money, the last thing that the Country needs is all that money transferred to the next generation, the whole workforce will have to be brought in from overseas.
I think we will definitely get a labor Government in and they will implement the changes required, to stop the inter generational wealth transfer.
When you think about the amount of citizen conditioning that has been done, in the name of covid control, there really shouldn't be any problem bring in a lot of structural change, so it should be interesting IMO.
Whether they take it off the boomers, or somehow stop the transfer to their children, will be worth keeping an eye on.
If they take it off those who have saved it, that may have a negative effect on the next generation saving and investing, more likely to introduce some form of death duty IMO.
Also the some of the changes Mick suggested, will be implemented IMO.
No chance. Just think about the uproar:Over the next 20 years that intergenerational wealth transfer is estimated to be about what's currently in super . $ 3.5 Trillion....taxed at just 15% + the medicare levy in the well-deserving hands of the rising generation.
Unless of course, if a modest, say 10% death duty were to be brought in, on top of that, by either party's proper tax reform. It's still possible that Ken Henry's Report of so long ago, could be dusted off for another look!
I agree they will be squeezed, but I disagree with how it will be done, the trajectory of income tax and business tax is down, not up.No chance. Just think about the uproar:
"Inheriting a place is the only hope we ever had of owning a home and now you're taking that from us too".
Like I said, gen X are the ones that are going to get squeezed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?