PZ99
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Joined
- 13 May 2015
- Posts
- 3,323
- Reactions
- 2,434
The strong investment returns on illiquid assets is, in fact, referred to as the ‘illiquidity premium’, a reward for the risk funds are willing to adopt when they buy these lumpy assets that are hard to sell.
The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald can confirm Unisuper, the $85 billion fund for university workers, has cut the value of its holdings in unlisted infrastructure by 6 per cent, and its unlisted property holdings by 10 per cent.
Unisuper's unlisted infrastructure investments include the Brisbane and Adelaide airports. Among its property holdings are the Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre in Sydney and Malvern Central Shopping Centre in Melbourne.
It comes after AustralianSuper, the nation's biggest super fund, told members it had cut the value of the unlisted assets on its books by 7.5 per cent
While I believe there is a real illiquidity premium, I also think it's arguable whether these assets have even actually outperformed or are simply marked to fantasy values because they are unlisted the fund managers can get away with dodginess. Same problem in Private Equity.
Look at this
https://www.smh.com.au/business/ban...value-of-unlisted-assets-20200324-p54des.html
See, a complete mark to fantasy joke.
Listed infra funds dropped by a lot more than 6 - 10%. Sydney Airport certainly dropped by a lot more than 6%, so how can they justify marking Brisbane and Adelaide airports only down -6%?
I am sure plenty of listed fund managers would have liked to mark their assets down only 7.5% in March
"The structure of many funds will now be put to the blowtorch: the definition of “balanced” funds, which includes a large portion of growth assets, will be tested, the poor transparency of unlisted assets in global infrastructure will be tested, the skewed demographics where some funds have too many young workers (Cbus, Hostplus, REST) or some have too many older members (UniSuper) will be tested.
Publicly, big funds have already dismissed notions that liquidity will be tested, just as they have presented a face of unity on the government’s economic crisis package. But divisions will reach breaking point if the government does not do more to ensure the smooth functioning of the scheme. Indeed, industry analysts already warn that industry funds would be among the first to “freeze” withdrawals if the situation deteriorates."
I see some people are starting to say the super system is just a big Ponzi scheme, what some on here have been saying for years.
SMSFs are closely watched by the ATO, I dont know about anyone else, but my fund is always 40% cash at worst.Just funds or Self managed as well?
The one thing from all this that is certain, is that it is like musical chairs, when the music stops there will be a lot less chairs to sit on.I imagine certain section of the work force may draw on their super more than others
Like hospitality more so than construction but then it depends on how deep this $hitstorm goes
The one thing from all this that is certain, is that it is like musical chairs, when the music stops there will be a lot less chairs to sit on.
I think tradies are fine Humid, you guys like my son are always required, even engineers can't do the hands on stuff.
Well most can't, I know a couple who started as apprentices, became engineers and ended up CEO's.
Amasing guys who ended up hard arsed bosses, but never forgot where they came from and didn't take BS from the floor level at meetings well.
It certainly is, IMO Trump lit the fuse on the Lima Agreement, where the first World countries agreed to send a lot of manufacturing to the third World Countries so they could lift out of poverty and pay their way.I think the whole affair is a wake up call for the world....particularly the west
You really do need to take the blinkers of IMO, neither party are bad, it is just a decission on which has the best policies at the time. Then vote accordingly.Australia is a Ferrari driven by Mr Magog unfortunately
We need major changes
No one in particular attacks working peopleYou really do need to take the blinkers of IMO, neither party are bad, it is just a decission on which has the best policies at the time. Then vote accordingly.
It is a bit like investing in shares, just because a company did well under certain management, doesnt mean it will perform as well under a different management.
No one in particular constantly attacks blue collar workersYou really do need to take the blinkers of IMO, neither party are bad, it is just a decission on which has the best policies at the time. Then vote accordingly.
It is a bit like investing in shares, just because a company did well under certain management, doesnt mean it will perform as well under a different management.
Good article Humid, the only thing it forgot to mention about the Costello TTR so called rort, that was stopped in 2017. Was that in that period of time Labor had two terms in office and didnt change it, macro business has some good articles, but it is a shame they have to bias everything.
Good article Humid, the only thing it forgot to mention about the Costello TTR so called rort, that was stopped in 2017. Was that in that period of time Labor had two terms in office and didnt change it, macro business has some good articles, but it is a shame they have to bias everything.
By the way I retired too young, to be able to use a TTR, not that I liked the idea anyway.
The idea of putting in $10k and withdrawing it, I think it would be more trouble than it was worth.
Just my opinion.
Like I said several times, but you seem to ignore, if you take them of me take them off everyone.In them 2terms the same could be said about franking credits which your still frothing at the mouth about
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?