(1) why? it will be starting from scratch with no where near enough in it to cover the cheapest fees I can find? (500 - 600 pa). this is why I am more interested in a managed fund, and I thought CareSuper is a leader?
(2,3,4) I am an accountant.... and I am uninterested in getting an adviser. Literally just looking for the answers to these queries/ interested in what others think.
(1) why? it will be starting from scratch with no where near enough in it to cover the cheapest fees I can find? (500 - 600 pa). this is why I am more interested in a managed fund, and I thought CareSuper is a leader?
(2,3,4) I am an accountant.... and I am uninterested in getting an adviser. Literally just looking for the answers to these queries/ interested in what others think.
Do your other investing outside this where you can take more risks and use the money for making your life better while you are not too old.
Don't blame the SMSF structure for that! These people clearly didn't know what they were doing and would have lost money whether investing inside or outside Super.I know a couple of people who did SMSF who have blown up their savings and have angry wives. Personally, I don't want the stress.
Yes, absolutely. And most of us do.I must say I agree with this sentiment. I've never understood why people are in such a headlong rush to go SMSF.
Control? Do people really think they are such savant investors that they will, untrained and part-time, exceed the performance of full-time professionals?
I don't do anything like this, but can't see why it's not a good idea. If either the painting or the unit has the potential to offer capital growth and the unit in the meantime is deriving income, what's the problem if the law allows it?Freaky stuff? Having your SMSF invest in a painting which hangs above your fireplace and can enjoy looking at even though you are not yet 55. Having your SMSF invest in a unit your son lives in... all these things seem to be not investment choices.
I must say I agree with this sentiment. I've never understood why people are in such a headlong rush to go SMSF.
Control? Do people really think they are such savant investors that they will, untrained and part-time, exceed the performance of full-time professionals?
Fees? There are plenty of reasonably-priced alternatives.
Freaky stuff? Having your SMSF invest in a painting which hangs above your fireplace and can enjoy looking at even though you are not yet 55. Having your SMSF invest in a unit your son lives in... all these things seem to be not investment choices.
I agree with Knobby22. Do your investing in addition to super, and let someone else manage your super. That way, if it turns out you are not the investment superman you hope you are, your future is still assured. It's a plan B. Plan A is that your investments outside of super turn out so well that your super becomes insignificant.
Diversification is good, and diversification of investment manager is equally valid.
Freaky stuff? Having your SMSF invest in a painting which hangs above your fireplace and can enjoy looking at even though you are not yet 55. Having your SMSF invest in a unit your son lives in... all these things seem to be not investment choices.
I'm not sure about the issue of the relative living in the investment property, but the SMSF can certainly invest in property.Pretty sure these are breaches of the SIS act.. If they were audited the accountant (if any) would be in some trouble as the members would lose their tax concessions..
Care Super been really good.
Australian Super has been nearly as good.
I am with Australian Super and they have been pretty good.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?