Can anyone give me a valuation of mortgage choice. I have it at $1.50
Sounds great to me, I was using 13% IRR and didn't have the same inputs as you. I was being quite conservative actually.
Try checking the IV for LEI. I have it in the $27 mark, current SP @ $22.03. Given its not perfectly stable management is this coming up on anyone's radar as value.able?
Can anyone give me a valuation of mortgage choice. I have it at $1.50
On 16th May 2011, LEI put out a statement that they had ran at a loss for the 9 months to 31/3 2011 of $382 Million.
So this financial year LEI will return a negative ROE.
Many of their projects are runniing at a loss, with more bad news today.
How could you calculate an intrinsic value using a negative ROE ?
LEI also claim they will make a profit next financial year 2011/2012.
They may or they may not.
But their performance would have to be a lot better than this year just to break even.
Using the I/V method of RM, you need to start with a company at least showing a ROE of 12 - 15%, and preferably a lot higher.
For the RM system you are using on this thread, can't understand why LEI would even be worthy of consideration until their results improve considerably.
Can anyone give me a valuation of mortgage choice. I have it at $1.50
I'm obviously doing something wrong. Getting around $5. No idea what I've done either lol.
I was using data from Commsec, had no idea about that announcement.
Info is on the commsec website.
Tick on News & Research
Company Research
Company profiles
Under ASX code - LEI then enter
Announcements
Scroll down to 16/5 2010 -2011 third quarter results.
PS. LEI had a capital raising, in April from memory, at $22.50 followed by a bookbuild at $22.70. Closed at $21.69 today. Already lost a dollar since the capital raising. LEI has been a cronic underperformer for some time now.
Often pays to go through this exercise before trying to calculate a valuation.
May save you a lot of money.
I really liking Mortgage choice, High yeild grossed up at almost 15%. No debt. But you gotta believe in australian housing markets for the future.
Given mortgage lending is a competitive market, what makes MC stand out??
There also have been some interesting articles written about housing in the forseeable future.
In Sydney certain suburbs since 2004 have either remained at the same value or gone slightly backwards.
RM also has added food for thought by commenting on the baby boomers that are retiring selling their home/s to fund retirement. All the extra supply will also lower prices, assuming thats what the baby boomers will do.
Given mortgage lending is a competitive market, what makes MC stand out??
There also have been some interesting articles written about housing in the forseeable future.
In Sydney certain suburbs since 2004 have either remained at the same value or gone slightly backwards.
RM also has added food for thought by commenting on the baby boomers that are retiring selling their home/s to fund retirement. All the extra supply will also lower prices, assuming thats what the baby boomers will do.
I'm fairly bearish on housing credit, I just don't see how you can keep stuffing the pinata; eventually something's gotta give.
I owned MOC way back in about 2002, it did pretty well, of course back then getting into debt was the flavour of the day. I just don't see where the growth in lending is going to come from. They do have a pretty good network of brokers, so maybe they'll look into utilising that asset to develop other revenue streams.
Not using a strict RM methodolgy, I get a value of $1.10 for MOC. RM got $0.99.
Excuse my lack of Roger's current I/V method and input into this thread but I'd just like to point out that I first met Roger Montgomery in 2005 when the ASX was still conducting their face-to-face "Introduction to the Sharemarket" course. He ran a module called "Selecting and Analysing Shares" and not one person walked out of the auditorium in Sydney without a degree of excitement or belief that his long term strategy "works".
At this point in time he was the founder and director of Clime Asset Management which at the time was trading at $1.00 (currently trading at $1.015) which goes to show the "long term approach". I believe CAM was a fund specifically tailored to sophisticated investors and speculate it was a project on which Roger could trial his I/V strategy according to the risk appetite of his clients. Originally based in a small office in Balmain, CAM is now located in Macquarie Place. I specifically remember Roger stating he didn't personally live the typical "Fund Manager" lifestyle and flew economy everywhere he could. His old website supported this ideal. On the 4/5/09 Roger resigned as Chairman but still remains on the board of directors.
I've watched Roger over the past 7 years and certainly believe he's one of Australia's leading "long-term" investment educators. He's commitment to educating the public is beyond anything I've seen before.
Unfortunately I'm not in the position to be able to commit to long-term investments due to my age, impatience and focus on quick profit. When I'm approaching 40+ though I'd certainly be following Roger's advice.
Cheers
Alexander
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?