- Joined
- 21 December 2008
- Posts
- 4,532
- Reactions
- 1
Whats the latest on Storm, Manny, SICAG moneyspiders and the rest of the motley crew?
Been away fishing.
Only been able to access Twitter from a Yankee mate's "cell".
Back in Townsville.
gg
I've often wondered why Manny was most often seen/photographed in jeans and open-necked shirt, almost as if he was verbalising "look at me - I'm just an ordinary bloke, just like you". Maybe I was wrong, and he's just a slob instead? Very disrespectful to appear in court under-dressed like that - I'm surprised his high-priced legal-eagles didn't dress him better...
Storm chief's affidavit at odds with prospectus
THE chief of the failed Storm Financial told an inquiry it was not the company's role to monitor its clients' loan to value ratios, despite documents stating it would do so.
At an inquiry into Storm in Brisbane today, Craig Wilkins, counsel for the liquidators Ivor Worrell, revealed that Storm founder Emmanuel Cassimatis had testified in an affidavit that it was not the company's function to keep track of clients' loan to value ratios.
Yet a 2007 prospectus for a planned Storm float - which did not proceed - declared that client portfolios would be actively monitored.
I have always found this website invaluable to peruse the day before a court appearance.
http://www.ehow.com/how_8979_dress-court-appearance.html
Going to court is a bit like doing examinations at school.
Its the preparation weeks before that gets one through, trying to cram the day before is useless.
So I always concentrate on my appearance particularly picking my suit and tie to give the appearance of one who takes the whole schamozzle seriously. (You usually find that anyone not wearing a Lowe's suit takes it seriously).
I usually wear one of my Giorgio Armani's.
(Note, Do not ever wear Banana Republic or Canali. I seen a guy do it once and he's still in Lotus Glen, and that was in the year of the Expo.)
Magistrates are always afraid of making mistakes and often deal with the unwashed, but Districk or Federal needs a certain sense of gravity.
Follow this formula and you have at least a fifty fifty chance of getting through with the minimum sentence, if they can prove on the evidence or plant it on you.
And you will get off if its a matter of your word against theirs.
gg
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?