The comments that attack SICAG and its motives or the role it should play astound me. They, like everyone, are interested in finding out the cause of this nightmare, and in time who is responsible and where the blame lies, be it with the banks, Storm, ASIC. Hopefully this will help to ensure it doesn’t happen again. However, SICAG was originally set up by storm clients to support each other. Many of these retired people are fighting to stop their lives sinking further into despair, if that is possible, with many having already been forced by the bank to sell everything they own. Most have been financially destroyed, and so if going after the CBA and CGI , rather than STORM for financial recompense seems suspicious to you, try existing under the permanent threat of losing your house, with no prospect of gaining employment because of your age.
The CBA have admitted problems with their loans, discrepancies in their systems (presumably the accuracy of their market monitoring software). Their submission appears to contain statements that are inaccurate in the least and possibly deliberately dishonest or deceitful at worst. The CBA has already begun a process of limited compensation, and has already admitted “some” fault. All this and there are still (at least) three investigations into this debacle to be completed. What more has to happen before some of the contributors to this forum eat humble pie, and admit that these people are victims and that SICAG, whatever its committee make up is should be doing nothing but seeking compensation for it members. Personally I don’t care who is on the committee if the end result is a better payout for those who have lost everything. STORM financial is a dead horse, the CBA took care of that and they have ensured that there is no compensation within that area that can help the victims.
Surely SICAG’s primary role should be to help its members gain some form of financial security from this debacle, and this stage that means the CBA and CGI for their role in this margin call disaster. Nothing else is going to help these people rebuild what’s left of their lives.
It is the role of the senate inquiry, the ASIC investigation and the inquiry by the liquidators to establish how this happened and who is at fault. Those contributors who continue with discussions regarding the composition of SICAG, its “model”, its purpose and all the other rubbish I read shows little in the way of an intelligent understanding of this whole affair. They also seem to have a very juvenile and naïve understanding of how people operate and the extent to which companies show scant regard for its customers, not to mention a very naive understanding of the way the media reports much of this.
Keep up the great work SICAG, and just go for the money !
The CBA have admitted problems with their loans, discrepancies in their systems (presumably the accuracy of their market monitoring software). Their submission appears to contain statements that are inaccurate in the least and possibly deliberately dishonest or deceitful at worst. The CBA has already begun a process of limited compensation, and has already admitted “some” fault. All this and there are still (at least) three investigations into this debacle to be completed. What more has to happen before some of the contributors to this forum eat humble pie, and admit that these people are victims and that SICAG, whatever its committee make up is should be doing nothing but seeking compensation for it members. Personally I don’t care who is on the committee if the end result is a better payout for those who have lost everything. STORM financial is a dead horse, the CBA took care of that and they have ensured that there is no compensation within that area that can help the victims.
Surely SICAG’s primary role should be to help its members gain some form of financial security from this debacle, and this stage that means the CBA and CGI for their role in this margin call disaster. Nothing else is going to help these people rebuild what’s left of their lives.
It is the role of the senate inquiry, the ASIC investigation and the inquiry by the liquidators to establish how this happened and who is at fault. Those contributors who continue with discussions regarding the composition of SICAG, its “model”, its purpose and all the other rubbish I read shows little in the way of an intelligent understanding of this whole affair. They also seem to have a very juvenile and naïve understanding of how people operate and the extent to which companies show scant regard for its customers, not to mention a very naive understanding of the way the media reports much of this.
Keep up the great work SICAG, and just go for the money !