This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Maybe living up to their slogan..??
 

Attachments

  • cba.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 429
Thanks Bunyip I've read the posts you've recommended and the book is on my next shopping list. Can't thank you enough. As I find useful info on this site I'm putting it all in one document as a future reference.
 
That is really good, Harleyquin.

If I may make an observation. Stormers were screwed to the wall by following the advice of others and others includes well meaning friends and family.

Same concept could be said for information on this forum. Although it is free and freely given, posters have their own ideas, wants, needs and objectives. These are not yours. You have to develop your own. So sometimes it can be better not to look at what others have achieved but explore and take up those aspects which interest you, discard others with which you are not comfortable and just go your own way. Your finances, money matters and other more important things are between you and your partner, no one else.

Now just go for it - but slowly.
 
The submissions were going to the inquiry not SICAG. I have only ever read encouragement from SICAG to submit whatever story. Mine bashes all!!
If you had something different it should be out there.

Maybe you should go back through the posts on the SICAG website then and find the one I'm talking about. It is out there.
 

Pegasus, I know personally of advisors who had sold out, some had not your right, but mine had. and more had sold either part or all.. Just like manny mine had lies to me about selling, he slipped up at a face to face near the end and outed himself!!
 
Judd, you've highlighted a really good principle.

In the case of Bunyip's recommendation, however, reading Weinstein's book is something I think a lot of people on this site would endorse. For me, at least, it was like someone turning a light on.

Harleyquin will probably first want to understand how a stock market works and hopefully she'll take advantage of the ASX's education section.
 
Thanks Bunyip I've read the posts you've recommended and the book is on my next shopping list. Can't thank you enough. As I find useful info on this site I'm putting it all in one document as a future reference.



I reckon that you Harleyquin should start a thread called Harleyquin.

You have a good attitude and you could chronicle your recovery using as much assets of knowledge from asf as possible to become self sufficient again.

gg
 
ok its been another very very busy week again-i tried to keep up with wahts been happening and my head is spinning-i cant believe that mr c said that stomers were told that they could lose the house if things went bad-what a load of bullshait-id like to use another word but im sure id get banned-the
exact opposite was told-if anything went bad they would bail you out-were any other stormers told by this mob you could end up losing the house???
gee this makes me so so mad-they siad they woulld look after you-there is NOTHING to worry about-its all in hand-what about the CB freaking A-they changed the policy of advising margining calls in 2003-was anybody told?-come on mr megabucks norris show some b*lls on this-id like to get mr norris and mr c in front of judge judy on one of her bad attitude days and rip into both of them and make them come back with some real answers-not the waffle we heard at the enquiry from mr c and not the ducking and weaving we heard from the CB freaking A. im not a smart ar*e shinny bum i real worker- how about some justice-end of weekly rant-!!!!!!!
 

Good rant, chrisgee. Keep it going as it can be cathartic. I'm serious.

Just bear in mind that Mr Norris was not the CEO of CB-[expletive deleted]-A in 2003 so you maybe aiming at the wrong person. He is picking up the reins on legacy issues which did not occur, presumably, on his watch. It is what CB-[expletive deleted]-A does now to correct those wrongs which is the important part.
 

That was no rant mate.

A good summary.

Hang in mate, your day is coming.

gg
 
Thanks Bunyip I've read the posts you've recommended and the book is on my next shopping list. Can't thank you enough. As I find useful info on this site I'm putting it all in one document as a future reference.

I just picked up a copy I'd ordered from my local library - I'm expecting big things after the reviews it's been getting


Sometimes I think the only good decision we made when it came to all things storm, was to ignore their advice to sell the factory owned by our smsf and put the money into the market. We bought the factory about 5 years ago and our business rents it from our smsf - by far the best financial decision we've ever made. If I ever have enough spare cash for a deposit on property investment I think I'd go for commercial property again. Guess it depends where though.


What a very excellent idea chrisgee - would rate its backside off!
 

I agree with you Chrisgee. It looks like the inquiry is pressing the CBA for more answers. We are all getting extremely tired of the storm issue which should never have been allowed to reach this point. Many of us have spent the last six to eight months trying desperately to try and work out exactly where it all went wrong.

Let's hope the inquiry can find out exactly what did happen. In our case we thought we were going to a decent financial planner and were not aware that we had to understand and monitor everything, thought that's what we were paying them for -OK we made a mistake. Now all we want to know is 'Exactly why did it go so horribly wrong and who is to blame for destroying us financially and emotionally.'
 

Yes Halrey. we are all wondering the same, Many people in the public, and here on ASF have the view that WE are the ones responsible, and although I do feel some responsibility for letting it go so far, I definately do not feel as though we are at the top of the food chain in blame on this one...

As you stated, and everyone knows, we were paying top dollar to have them manage our investment, and on many occasions, the words, DONT WORRY we know best and that is why you are paying for us to look after your... blah blah... you know how it goes...

So with that I say, if FP's can absolve themselves of all responsibility when things go t1ts up, than i think governments should have a look if this form of business should be allowed to continue..

And as I have said before, if it is, I will be off to get my FP licence...
 
Ladies and gentlemen, I am urging you all to please be very careful when using the QUOTE tags. Some posting in this thread have been messing them up of late and in some instances it looks like they are attributing the words of one poster to another. This is something I do not wish to occur for obvious reasons.

If you do not understand how the QUOTE tags work please read this thread: https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2737

It is actually very simple and to ensure that you get it right, please consider using the 'Preview Post' button (next to 'Submit Reply') before submitting your post, so you can review it thoroughly first. Please be aware that an 'Edit' button appears on your post for 20 minutes after you do submit it, so there really is no excuse for not ensuring that your post is formatted correctly.
 


Thanks guys and gals.

My hope would be that FInancial Planners would cease to exist.

I feel financial management should be introduced in primary school and that it should be a required subject for an OP score in high school.

It is just as important as Maths and English.

With some exeptions such as Carey and other shining lights who should cater for rich people playing in a bigger game, the ordinary Jo Blow ( excuse me Joe , not you) should be able to plan his or her investments, super and inflows and outflows as well as any financial planner.

So Bernie Ripoll, I know you read ASF, (our spies are everywhere,) be a different politician and ban the FP manque type old Nat Mutual leeches and educate our youth about finances.

gg
 
I feel financial management should be introduced in primary school and that it should be a required subject for an OP score in high school.

It is just as important as Maths and English.

Hmmm - as a teacher I have a real dilemma when people say stuff like this. I heard it at the inquiry on Thursday and instantly had a very negative reaction to it. At the same time I understand what people are trying to suggest.

This is why the negative jumps out..
1 - If many people in the financial industries cannot educate themselves properly (as seems evidenced by the lack of qualifications attached to being a financial advisor) or others (as seems evidenced by the extensive education plan that SF clients thought they were getting) what makes you think that primary and secondary teachers would do better?
2 - How deeply would you expect a primary or secondary student to learn aspects of financial management?
3 - What is currently in the curriculum of our students that you believe should be thrown out in order to fit the financial management curriculum?
4 - Are you aware of what aspects of finances are already included in the curricula (primary and secondary) around the nation? You might actually be quite surprised to see what is actually there. It is not all in maths by the way.
5 - There are aspects of financial management (eg superannuation) that most students wouldn't learn (even if it was in the curriculum) as it is not relevant enough to their world at the point in time that the learning is occurring.
6 - Learning in the 21st century is about life long skills. (This is a point that non-educators may find challenging and are likely to criticize loudly as they don't have the understanding of current educational philosophies) If too much emphasis on financial knowledge is placed on school curricula we run the risk of teaching our students information that will be obsolete within 2 - 3 years (even less). Students need to learn how to be flexible with their learning and find answers that are relevant to their context at the time they are learning. We need to develop our primary and secondary school students as people who recognise that information changes rapidly and learn at all times in their life.

On the other hand...
I definitely see why people want to add it. A lot of it is about trying to give students some understanding of finances before they leave school.

It was brought up by representatives of the Australian Investors Association in Brisbane on Thursday. Senator McLucas was very quick to point out why it really is not a valid option. I would suggest you might like to read the Hansard when it comes out to get your own understanding of what she said.

All too often I hear people use school as the fix-up for society's problems and so have an almost inbuilt cringe mechanism when people suggest putting yet another thing in a very overcrowded curriculum.

Cheers
Maccka
 
"Legal tussle over Storm documents"

"PEOPLE involved in Storm Financial's collapse, including the founder, Emmanuel Cassimatis, may face further action over the collapse of the financial planning group, legal manoeuvring at a parliamentary committee hearing suggested last week.

Mr Cassimatis told the committee he had gathered documents and asked for permission to table them.

Tabling documents before a parliamentary committee means they gain the protection of parliamentary privilege"

More by Stuart Washington in the SMH here;

http://business.smh.com.au/business/legal-tussle-over-storm-documents-20090906-fcss.html
 

Top post, Maccka. The level of financial information offered seems to vary by school. The high school where I mentor students has basic financial management included in its accounting option but this was a programme designed by the individual teacher and not part of the Qld Education curriculum. This teacher also arranged for outside people to come in and talk to her students about the sharemarket during the time they played the Sharemarket Game on the ASX

On the other hand, we offered a series of financial management workshops to the same school as part of the Youth Mentoring Programme and received zilch interest from the school.

As you suggest, the curriculum is already overcrowded, teachers are having to deal with unprecedented behaviour issues amongst students, and I'm quite over hearing people suggest that 'schools should teach A, B, C, and D. etc'
It's about time parents took a bit more of the responsibility that should be regarded theirs rather than the school's. All too often, however, the parents haven't a clue themselves.
 
Even the most basic of financial education could be taught in schools and would benefit people.

* Live within your means (spend less than you earn)
* Invest the difference in appreciating assets
* Whereever possible, only use debt to invest in assets that return an income and are likely to appreciate in value.
* Whereever possible, don't go into debt to purchase items that don't generate an income and are likely to depreciate in value
* Appreciate what you have and don't put yourself into debt to buy things that you can't afford and don't need.

There's still a LOT of people that think their first car is their first big investment and think its a good idea to spend a lot of money on their first sofa because if they buy quality the first time around they won't need to buy another one for a long time (I'm serious - there really are people out there that think like this).
 
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...