- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
It's been mentioned multiple times that management thinks breakeven cash flow is at about $50 Oil.
So for STO can make enough earnings to get a 20 PE for example, would require (rough estimate) $65 Oil.
So even though Oil is $30, you're buying STO priced for $65 Oil.
That's an awful deal IMO!
Yea, heard something like $US40, so about $50 AUD, for GLNG operation.
Last quarter its oil sales averages some $60 AUD right? Contract will definitely be lower now given the recent/current crash. But it won't mean STO will bear all the brunt either - it could, for example, buy similarly cheap oil and pass it on to customers.
But thing is, can oil remain at these level for long? STO has enough to pump for 20 years at least... not all of them will be at this level unless oil remains so for another decade. If it couldn't be this low, when oil goes up the profit then will make up for today's losses.
GLNG, from memory, is designed for at least 20 years. We can't take this last and next couple years prices to project its profitability for its entire life.
Brighter side is it's planning to divest certain assets. the pipelines for GLNG could fetch its share to maybe $1B. That would be enough to weather next couple of years low oil prices.
Why can't oil return to say long term average of $20
View attachment 65766
No double there will be violent squeeze along the way... Why not just buy oppies on oil instead?
If you asked me if Oil will be above $60 sometime in the next 10 years, I'd confidently say yes.
So theoretically STO would be making enough earnings at $60 Oil to be fair value at current price.
The problem is all that does is get you to where every fair valued stock is already.
that's actually one thing i still haven't figured out... why is it oil prices have affected energy companies? it'd be a bit like getting rid of white because black is out of fashion. as far as i know, oil isn't a major energy producing commodity and hasn't been for a while, so i'm lost to that link.
Yea, heard something like $US40, so about $50 AUD, for GLNG operation.
Last quarter its oil sales averages some $60 AUD right? Contract will definitely be lower now given the recent/current crash. But it won't mean STO will bear all the brunt either - it could, for example, buy similarly cheap oil and pass it on to customers.
But thing is, can oil remain at these level for long? STO has enough to pump for 20 years at least... not all of them will be at this level unless oil remains so for another decade. If it couldn't be this low, when oil goes up the profit then will make up for today's losses.
GLNG, from memory, is designed for at least 20 years. We can't take this last and next couple years prices to project its profitability for its entire life.
Brighter side is it's planning to divest certain assets. the pipelines for GLNG could fetch its share to maybe $1B. That would be enough to weather next couple of years low oil prices.
Good read.Santos gave some figures for Break even 2016, US$32 with the Kipper sale, Without it would have been $47.
This website have a pretty good summary of Santos
http://www.howlinggales.com/
That's a bit more like it.Broker said today that the break even for oil with Santos was 43.50 at the end of June, now closer to 40 targeting 35 per barrel.
Lots of debt to get through before it's an FMG or WHC but trying apparantly.
That's a bit more like it.
First major debt repayments aren't till 2019 so they have time.
They can sell stuff PNG LNG or something else, and anyway debt in the lowest interest rate environment in history shouldn't really be a problem.
Just typing out loud but seriously thinking of taking at least half of my holdings out on this recent run.
Super has done really well on it also.
$4.58 was my target on both but......
Just typing out loud but seriously thinking of taking at least half of my holdings out on this recent run.
Super has done really well on it also.
$4.58 was my target on both but......
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?