- Joined
- 27 June 2010
- Posts
- 4,203
- Reactions
- 329
I give up. Maybe I will look into this tomorrow. I can't find a Prospectus anywhere on their website.
I give up. Maybe I will look into this tomorrow. I can't find a Prospectus anywhere on their website.
Good Customer relations may not equal Good Investor relations. The surf industry is highly competitive. I doubt the margins are really there. I can not say any more since I can't find much news on SurfStitch (especially in front and not behind a firewall).
Strangely, I prefer to buy a wetsuit from an actual shop where I can try it on. I will not buy a surf board on line either. That's where I draw the line. Otherwise the other stuff I buy are great.
Emotions has made me fall in love with this IPO. The Prospectus is filled with lots of pretty pics of surfer girls. Realising that I can't get my head around their numbers, not knowing whether it is great or not great - that tells me that giving this IPO a miss is fine. Maybe SurfStitch will have a massive increase on its first day of trading just like Beacon Lighting (I missed out on Beacon Lighting since it was oversubscribed.) I am holding onto my cash for now. It is only an extra $14.95 of brokerage if I want to get SurfStitch later. Something tells me maybe I won't. At least if I need a rashie or boardies, I will still be their customer during sale time.
That explains what happened to Billabong earlier this year. Some commentor mentioned (I can't remember when this was said but I remember hearing this on ABC Radio World Today straight after 12pm news) that kids preferred QuickSilver over Billabong. Billabong has outdated fashion sense. I thought both brands were similar. Why didn't they say Billabong paid too much for SurfStitch. Billabong was 'carrying' SurfStitch.then the slide of BBG begins, in many of BBG reports and briefing it boast surfstitch revenue but it never show any profit and yet they keep pumping more money into more inventory and expand this online business.
I guess those taking part in the IPO will takeover Billabong's previous role.When BBG fall from grace and the hedgefund comes in and restructure the ownership, spins off surfstich is one way they are going to get some of their money back.
and no profit but burned cash?
In hindsight, SRF would have been a great trade. Immediately after the float, it fell to $0.90. Slowly climbed and went sideways. Only last few weeks that it climbed up quickly but I'm not skilled enough to read these situations.
Calculations are probably off-topic to SRF, but the NPAT margin might be relevant.On a related note, the Kogan prospectus forecasts NPAT of $400k (yes k, not m) this year on revenue of ~$200m. Fear not however, FY17 is when the big bucks will start rolling in. EBITDA will rise 138% and NPAT will rise 600%. Revenue will rise at a pedestrian 19%...says the prospectus anyway. Apparently that makes it worth $140m.
I think that pretty much shows why it is so hard to make a dime in these online only businesses. You need so much bloody scale.
Calculations are probably off-topic to SRF, but the NPAT margin might be relevant.
400k increased by 600% is 2.4mil.
200mil revenue increased by 19% is 238m.
NPAT margin 2.4/238 = 1.01%
I remember reading that the online electronics market in Australia is about $2bil this year (not sure where this was from), but that means they've already got over 10%. I bet some of it isn't addressable to them either.
Is there really much operating leverage in these kinds of businesses? I can't see it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?