- Joined
- 20 November 2005
- Posts
- 787
- Reactions
- 92
Bloody hell Nick, That's 4 things to add up, I can't find any of them on my calculator and no matter what I try it keeps coming up with nothing...non-licensed + General public + Bull market + leveraged environment = ?
Nick Radge said:non-licensed + General public + Bull market + leveraged environment =
This may sound facetious (but it is not meant to be, it is meant to be good advice) - what does your trading plan tell you to do in this situation? Sell or hold?fryzie said:I start trading about 2 months ago with $5,000. But my stocks have done nothing but go down hill and ive lost about $1,500 so far. Should i just sell everything and count my losses?
:nono:If I was you I would put the lot into Woolworths shares
My suggestion - go out to a bookstore immediately and purchase at least one good book on stock trading and read it as if your money depended on it (since it does). There are many good books for beginners (and many bad ones), but the one I'd suggest as the friendliest read at this point in time for you would be Louise Bedford's Trading Secrets.
As long as you're not leveraged.nizar said:BECAUSE THE MOST U CAN LOSE IS 100%
nizar said:I agree realist
Peter Lynch's research shows that if u were to invest a sum of money annually at the highest point in every single year (how unlucky), over 20 years u would make 10.6times ur money, and if u were to invest a sum of money annually at the lowest point in every single year (wat a champ), over 20 years u would make 11.7times ur money
Not a great deal of difference
In the last 30 years the FTSE is up by 19-fold
In the last 25 years the DOW is up by 13-fold
And of course some stocks outperformed massively
Why is it so easy to be profitable in the stockmarket in the long-term?
BECAUSE THE MOST U CAN LOSE IS 100% BUT THERE IS NO CEILING TO THE GAINS
Realist said:My suggestion is to give up trading!!
The stress, tax, and brokerage fees, only lead to a death of 1000 cuts.
professor_frink said:Going back to the start of any bullmarket will make the return look impressive
here's flip side to that statement
3/9/1929 DOW-380
25 years later
3/9/1954 DOW 343
-9.7%.
The DOW bottomed in 1932 at around 40
lol
nizar said:DOW was from 1982 until now: so that famous 1987 crash is included
But of course u can take the example of the biggest stockmarket crash in history; from 380pts in 1929 until 43pts in 1932..
MichaelD said:My suggestion - go out to a bookstore immediately and purchase at least one good book on stock trading and read it as if your money depended on it (since it does).
Going back to the start of any bullmarket will make the return look impressive
here's flip side to that statement
3/9/1929 DOW-380
25 years later
3/9/1954 DOW 343
-9.7%.
Realist said:ahh, but Professr Fink, (if that is your real name?). I believe you would be ahead over that time. Because "u invest a sum of money annually at the highest point in every single year".
For most of those years the dow was under 343.
You lose on the shares you buy in 1929 sure, but in 1932 you may have been buying when it was less than 50, in which case you'd maybe make a 700% increase on those shares. Add in dividends reinvested you'd be miles ahead!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?