wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,966
- Reactions
- 13,275
Gorillatheasxgorilla said:If there are 200 constituents the likelihood of a single exchange affecting eventing causing all of them to fall out of bed is pretty slim. But if you were in a single constituent, like for example NAB during the traders scandal in 2004, you would have really felt the pain.
You don't tie risk up in a "chart"...no matter what you trade there is always an underlying reality eg. a commodity, a currency, a company.
NO!Bronte said:So are you now in agreement?
wayneL said:Trade the SPI, Cotton, Oil, Gold, Soybeans etc. and you are genuinely diversified.
Non diversification (my definition for the sake of this point) may not be a bad thing.theasxgorilla said:Diversification (to me) isn't an absolute. You can be more or less diversified. I would say that trading the SPI is more diversified than trading BHP. But trading BHP is more diversified than say, MCR. I know someone who trades only the S&P500 and this presents sufficient diversification for him.
So what was the point of:wayneL said:Non diversification (my definition for the sake of this point) may not be a bad thing.
There are a lot of factors involved. If I was exclusively day trading like the Brontemen are, the SP500, or the SPI, or the Dow, HS whatever is absolutely fine all on its own. Some are even comfortable swing trading one instrument.
Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Even using the futures as an index fund is fine as it offers diversification within the index.
Nothing wrong with any of these. But as a "trading instrument", you are not diversified. Subtle, but important difference.
You stated you trade the SPI for diversification.Bronte said:So what was the point of:
????????????????
Post #3
I'm with you Pager- daytrading index futuresPager said:We all trade to basically make a buck, but which markets/instruments do those on this forum trade and why?
All have there pros and cons but why do you favour a particular market over another, many may trade 2 or 3 or maybe all instruments but I would expect even these traders favour 1 market over the others.
I trade Index Futures and on a short term basis, very rarely hold past the close of any market, for me Index Futures are the simplest form of trading and I would go as far to say that trading these types of futures is a far more even playing field for all participants in the market.
Costs involved are very low compared to other markets, buying 1 contract on the Spi for example costs from $5 to $20 depending on the broker, that contract at current prices controls about $140,000, markets are liquid and spreads generally pretty tight, although slippage in some markets can be bad when they are moving quickly.
Cheers
Pager
This is true, but such diversification may be negative. I am not making the the point whether you should or shouldn't, or how much, oe whether it's good or bad, just that you aren't.Bronte said:To be fully diversified you probably require to own:
Property
Shares
Cash
Then to go overseas and own:
Overseas Property
Overseas Shares
Overseas currency
Don't stop here:
Invest in Real Estate on the moon
Luna shares
Moon rock
wayneL said:This is true, but such diversification may be negative. I am not making the the point whether you should or shouldn't, or how much, oe whether it's good or bad, just that you aren't.
Simple point made complicated.
theasxgorilla said:Simple as it was I think you missed it. Internal diversification of the instrument you trade can reduce volatility making price action smoother, making technical analysis easier and high leverage trading safer.
"Internal diversification" is a valid reason for wanting to trade the SPI. Subtle, but important.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?