- Joined
- 8 January 2015
- Posts
- 273
- Reactions
- 5
I'm shocked by it all. I haven't seen anything like this ever.
This is an object lesson that is priceless.
I'm shocked by it all. I haven't seen anything like this ever.
Good lesson to know what you're investing in.
It's really sad to see 'the other place' where the majority have a very basic mental make up, trying to barrack for the SP every hour, having very little idea about what affects the shareprice and earnings of the company.
Good lesson to know what you're investing in.
It's really sad to see 'the other place' where the majority have a very basic mental make up, trying to barrack for the SP every hour, having very little idea about what affects the shareprice and earnings of the company.
SGH's recent woes remind me of Claudius' line in Hamlet:
"When sorrows come, they come not single spies
But in battalions".
No... but can we assume they may change their name to "SlaterGordon" to keep up with their good mates at "LendLease."Beautifully put. Can you come up with another Shakespearean quote when ASIC gives them the all clear... yet nobody cares anymore?
... Beautifully put. Can you come up with another Shakespearean quote when ASIC gives them the all clear...
I looked there a few times. I deduced that everyone on the other forum must be delusional... the 85% who still think this will go back to $6 are delusional by their posts, while the remaining 15% who keep posting there with rational thoughts are delusional by association.
The funniest was probably someone with the name "TechnicalsSayItAll" keep ramping it up every minute or so. Cashflow problems? Good news. Regulatory change? Good news. Price crashes 50%? Good news. Most Monty-pythonish.
The other forum is hysterical. One guy posited the question "will SGH go bankrupt or be taken over?" First response: "What an idiot statement". Second reply: "Without a shadow of a doubt - NIL CHANCE"
It seems to me that you are already so sure about everything while the reality is that in the UK no law has changed yet and even if it does, nobody can assess the real impact on SGH's revenue yet.
... It is not a sinking ship yet...
New to this forum and no do not post under any other user name
Have been perusing a number of forums since the SGH saga
Seems to me some of the other forum posts are for manipulative purposes only
Pull me up if I am wrong but the grasp of the English language seems to be sadly lacking with off the cuff comments based on speculative ideas with the hope of manipulating the market to gain an advantage
Sure at this stage SGH based on current price does not look good and everyone is guessing what will happen this coming week
It is the shorters who have created this crash and panic
More interesting that slaters purchase was nowhere near the old highs but rather close to the lows. So there must have been a grain of truth to the short selling attacks since SGH's lowball offer was acceptedReferring back to Quindell before the SGH acquisition they lost around 80% of thier market value after falling victim to one of the most infamous short selling attacks in trading history falling victim to market rumour and gossip.
Since then the share price made double-digit gains
Surely SGH were aware of this and did not fly in blind
In this respect an interesting read http://www.investopedia.com/articles/analyst/030102.asp
The catalyst for this sudden depletion in the share price appears to be based on a lone announcement by the British Government re third party claims and pending inquiries into the accounting practices consequently the shorters jumped in creating market panic
I am a substantial holder in SGH and have managed to average down to a respectable price and will be looking for an out with profit in the coming months
Next week will tell the story
It is not a sinking ship yet and yes I do have the life jacket on
Referring back to Quindell before the SGH acquisition they lost around 80% of thier market value after falling victim to one of the most infamous short selling attacks in trading history falling victim to market rumour and gossip.
Since then the share price made double-digit gains
Surely SGH were aware of this and did not fly in blind
New to this forum and no do not post under any other user name
Have been perusing a number of forums since the SGH saga
Seems to me some of the other forum posts are for manipulative purposes only
Pull me up if I am wrong but the grasp of the English language seems to be sadly lacking with off the cuff comments based on speculative ideas with the hope of manipulating the market to gain an advantage
Sure at this stage SGH based on current price does not look good and everyone is guessing what will happen this coming week
It is the shorters who have created this crash and panic
Referring back to Quindell before the SGH acquisition they lost around 80% of thier market value after falling victim to one of the most infamous short selling attacks in trading history falling victim to market rumour and gossip. Since then the share price made double-digit gains
Surely SGH were aware of this and did not fly in blind
In this respect an interesting read http://www.investopedia.com/articles/analyst/030102.asp
The catalyst for this sudden depletion in the share price appears to be based on a lone announcement by the British Government re third party claims and pending inquiries into the accounting practices consequently the shorters jumped in creating market panic
I am a substantial holder in SGH and have managed to average down to a respectable price and will be looking for an out with profit in the coming monthsNext week will tell the story
It is not a sinking ship yet and yes I do have the life jacket on
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.