Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Senator Joe (Joseph) Biden

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is one very big possibility, the DOCUMENTS NEVER EXISTED.

Are these people so dumb, you have obtained incriminating documents, never thought you might scan them for an electronic copy. Come on, paper only, so last century.
Yeah agree for once.

They said they had photos of the documents. Lets see them
 
Hmm...

Lets see what plays out here

Tucker 01.jpeg
 
I'm seeing on The Union of Soviet Socialist Blue Checks that UPS has putatively found the docs.

The plot thickens.
 
I'm seeing on The Union of Soviet Socialist Blue Checks that UPS has putatively found the docs.

The plot thickens.

While I wouldn't be surprised if it was all true seems weird its go on for so long and losing the Docs is beyond strange.
 
Well one reason to lose the docs and then find them a few days later, if that happened, is to prevent scrutiny of their authenticity prior to the election.
 
Well one reason to lose the docs and then find them a few days later, if that happened, is to prevent scrutiny of their authenticity prior to the election.
It's amazing how the attitude to these types of things changes depending on who the candidate is ;)
 
It's amazing how the attitude to these types of things changes depending on who the candidate is ;)

Of course. If allegations come from high up reputable apolitical government officials, like those who made claims against Trump regarding his dealing with Ukraine and one has evidence from his own mouth that he did such things and one knows those types of things are consistent with everything else he has done in his life both in politics and in business, and of which he has boasted, then one would give such allegations much credence. On the other hand, allegations against the Bidens dug up through the likes of Giuliani and associates, who we know have being trying to dig up any type of dirt true or untrue by bribing anyone who has ever had contact with the Bidens, and when we have had several enquiries both from Republican committees and Ukrainian government bodies that have exonerated them of any wrong doing, then any new allegations right on the eve of the election would likely be taken with great scepticism. Even Carlson's own lawyers have said in the past that what Carlson say's is not necessarily to be taken as the truth, or words to that effect.

If you are unable to discern the difference between reliable and unreliable sources, well what can one say....
 
Of course. If allegations come from high up reputable apolitical government officials, like those who made claims against Trump regarding his dealing with Ukraine and one has evidence from his own mouth that he did such things and one knows those types of things are consistent with everything else he has done in his life both in politics and in business, and of which he has boasted, then one would give such allegations much credence.
You have to be kidding.
They tried to impeach Trump for something that Biden did.
And he joked about it.
It couldn't be any clearer.
 
If you are unable to discern the difference between reliable and unreliable sources, well what can one say....
Indeed... But that's the way we roll around here isn't it ? Who needs reliable sources or even evidence ? :cautious:
 
Jimmy Dore spot on as usual


Hunter Biden's Emails -- Desperate Attempt To Discredit Them!






.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top