This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Schapelle Corby - Innocent or Guilty?

Considering the latest news, do you believe Schapelle Corby is innocent?

  • No, not any more

    Votes: 49 13.0%
  • No, never have

    Votes: 184 48.7%
  • Yes, always have and still do

    Votes: 80 21.2%
  • I don't care. Show me the stocks!

    Votes: 65 17.2%

  • Total voters
    378

Slim, you win, this post is the best so far on this thread. 99.9 out of 100.
 
Maybe next time she gets a leave pass for beauty therapy, she can meet up with her sister and do a dual photo shoot. That would rally her supporters and raise a few dollars for another round of appeals etc.
 
Slim, you win, this post is the best so far on this thread. 99.9 out of 100.

finally. a voice of reason on this topic! i think we've nailed it, check mate. used one of her advocates to prove she belongs there. i wanna hear kay say the aussie government leaves its own behind. she cant say that can she. corby stays. we all know why.
 

I'd say her case has more to do with hubby being a member or former member of the SAS than anything...
 
Why is it not surprising to read in foreigneignprisoners.com that the present two best friends of Corby's mother (Rosleigh Rose) just happened to be on the same flight to Bali as Corby and her brother, the day she was nabbed. Apparently Corby drew the short straw that day.

If any of the star-struck posters on this thread who fantasise over Corby's image, would like to know what she will look like when she get out of jail...see below.
 

Attachments

  • schapellesupporters (1).JPG
    89.3 KB · Views: 127
Somehow this post ALWAYS seems to be appropriate on here:


Just look at them. Look at the venim, the way they desperately seek any smear, any lie, any excuse. Would you like to meet any of them in the real world? Knowing what is inside them? Seeing the spiteful hatred on here, and the twisted pleasure at Schapelle Corby's pain?

These are seriously nasty and vile people.
 

Nasty indeed : Why don't you put all this into another video with your facts and figures?

P.S Miss Tingtong said she will be watching you...
 

Zack, if you are looking for seriously nasty and vile people, I suggest you look no further than the whole Corby gang and the growing band of self-seekers jumping on their band-wagon for their own publicity and mercenary gain.
 
"kay, if you go to communist dictatorship and engage in activities that have anything to do with human rights or the security industry you are either a spy or a trouble maker. what do you expect will happen?"


Just proving your own ignorance yet again unfortunately because you really are doing yourself an injustice!

You know absolutely nothing about me or my husband or our situation. Frankly, I don't care to explain myself to you either because you obviously have some trouble with basic comprehension. Also, clearly, you are a very closed minded person who should try to look beyond your own views of what you 'think' you know, and instead of attacking someone like me, whom you don't know anything about.... You should get a bit more aware.

What do you condemn people because it makes you feel better? What an odd person you are.

Putting aside your own obvious misgivings, I do however agree with you on one point, that if the Australian government were wholly convinced that Schapelle Corby were innocent, then they would have made every attempt to secure her release. BUT... it wouldn't just take a phone call for her to be out..... even when there is overwheling proof of innocence, there are still no guarantees!

Mr. Downer once said to a hundred strong auidence at a function where I was attending, was that the Australian Government aided us because they knew we were innocent... and when they believe an Australian is innocent they will do everything they can to bring them home.

I am not on trial here Sir.... and my reputation is more than intact.... and our case was well documented and it was clear to those involved, what was going on. And just because my husband was an SAS soldier, isn't the reason why they brought us home, in fact, to the contrary but that is not a conversation I'm going to have here in a public forum. However, he is still a serving member of the Special Forces and very highly regarded.... and puts his life on the line for people like you!

Instead of attacking me, why don't you stick to the facts of the Corby case, hence what the thread is titled.

I was happy to contribute to this discussion as invited, however I see there is very little point in me staying, given there is obviously no interest in logical discussion.
 
Maybe .... actually I don't support the invasion of another country either... trouble is when countries invite forces in to help sort out the existing troubles.... but that's a whole other topic as you say.
 

there you go team corby..... from the horses own mouth. she will tell you why corby is still in jail and why she will stay there.

kay.. i have no beef with you. thank you for admitting the obvious. if schapelle was innocent she would be free today. the governemtn knows she is not and they arent even trying.. never have never will.

dont worry.... i have no interest in what you did or why you do it. btu if you claim to be so innocent do you have any idea why you were arrested? surely they must have had some reason. of course you know very well.

but i wont continue this... i dont want any of us to be in breach of commonwealth secrets act... then i will really need you help to get out of jail

lets just end it with....... "australia looks after its own innocent citizens".
 

no madam you are not! and let me just add that i appreciate you and your husbands contribution to australia's security and your contribution to the spread of freedom and democracy in our region.

i am very happy they got you out of there.
 
Slim.... I've told the Corby Supporters on several occassions that it matters very little about whether they think Schapelle Corby is innocent because unless they can actually prove it .... then her situation remains unchanged doesn't it? We can all have an opinion either way and some are still uncertain as to the how and why.

The problem as I see it, is that people get too caught up in the innocent/guilt issue. They should look at the broader issues.

You made comparrisons with our case and the Corby's but in a legal sense there are no comparrisons... our lawyer was able to submit 317 page book of evidence to the Australian Government and hence why the Aust Govt supported us. Had Schapelle's legal team been able to do similar, then it would have been a different story.

It is fairly obvious so I have no probs stating it.... and hence has been the problem all along as to why the Aust Government cannot support her.

Yes, I do know why my husband and I were arrested... but surely this is not the thread for that. Do you want me to PM you some information for your own interest.... or do you want to wait till March and read the book 'Standing Ground' which will explain everything! lol.
 

Yes Kay, Slim is way out of order on this one. Obviously has never heard of your plight or knows anything about you. And there is no similarity between your situation and Corby, apart from the fact that it happened in a foreign country. I agree with you that the muttonheads on this forum should stay on track with the topic, which is Corby. Thank you for your impartial contribution to the forum on this topic and please dont give up. Just ignore the porkchops who think they have something of value to say re your situation.

BTW, I'm not sure that Percy and Trowell can be considered to have been capable of adding anything significant to Corby's case, which had been turned into a 3 ring circus by the media, family, hangers on, by the time they came on the scene. I know Trowell has some experience with their legal system but is not permitted to directly address the court - besides what good would that be without fluent Indonesian capability (which I dont think he has). And I'm also not sure they (by themselves) could be seen as quality legal representation in Indonesia even though they are high profile in Australia.

And, not that it's particularly relevant (just another twist in this whole sorry saga), but Mark Trowell has appeared in Sept 2008 before the West Australian State Administrative Tribunal this year over claims he acted unprofessionally when he released confidential information about the Corby case in 2005.


And for the record.. yet again..... I believe Corby has been harshly dealt with by their system. And with the benefit of hindsight, I would (hopefully) bet that if it could be rerun, Corby would not allow the saga to unfold in the way that it did. But no surprise of course.
 

If you have no beef with Kay then why continue to presume her guilt? It really doesn't take much more than some careful reading to see that the ridiculous charges that were brought up against her and her husband were entirely fabricated-not to mention their detainment completely illegal. Kay has said it herself, "Bad things do happen to good people."

It would be quite a shame to lose someone, on any forum, who actually has knowledge on the case, how foreign proceedings occur, and doesn't spew hatred and misinformation every chance they get. I think she can offer us some insight that we would otherwise not have and would like to see her stick around...and who knows, you might actually learn something if you'd just sit still long enough to listen to her instead of attack what she has to say. It seems to me that all you want to do is incite an argument and not field a discussion. Quite a difference as a "forum" is a place for discussion not hatred.
 
 
Dear Buddy,

Thank you for your support. I think the whole Corby case gets peope fired up emotionally and it's understandable.... the whole case was played out in the media like some Gerry Springer rerun.

The good news is, that as bad as the case turned out, it has been of great benefit to many other families. they have learnt from this case, what not to do, and what to do. There have been other positives too, for example; people can get their baggage wrapped at the airports. Granted, someone obviously saw a way to make money and capitalised, but I"m for anything that keeps Aussie travellers safe when they go abroad.

People too seem more aware now that the judicial process in other countries can often be very different from our own. This is something that many people just took for granted.

So though it hasn't turned out very well for Schapelle Corby, her case has still had a positive impact for others.
 

thanks again for your input kay

there is no doubt in my mind that what your saying here is extremely simple yet for many its a very hard concept to understand, i appreciate what your saying and totally agree.

perhaps zackw can calm down one day enough to have some clear rational thoughts about your input and see some clarity.

re your book, are you allow to publish? were you found guilty? would the proceeds of crime act 2002 interfere with you?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...