Vasu took a sample without approval and told Mercedes what he had done and what he was going to do with it. Mercedes told him not to go ahead with the testing as this would have no credibility in the court. Without it being an authorised sample, the court would dismiss any findings/analysis/report.Schu, My point was to show how wrong Zacko facts are, local drugs in Bali ARE cheaper, the Corby's lawyer got a sample of the drugs, but they did not test it. Zack has seven facts listed only the first one is correct, Corby was found at the air port with drugs. She now will do the time.
just because i am paranoid does not mean she is innocent.
well as i have said the police are not interested in drugs. if i was given a $1000 for each drug deal that i was able to enter into and record on film.... i would be a very rich man and would not have to follow stocks. i get people asking me to buy drugs on the street, in nightclubs. ive seen police do drugs.
what the police do is keep a track of everything and i think they knwo everyone involved in everything. what they dont do is take action against anyone probably becasue they are told not to.
they are too busy following government deirectives to catch domestic violence offenders and people speeding. things that win votes and things that raise revenue.
i had a mate who wanted to get back at this girl. so he told the cops she was a hooker, a drug dealer and illegal immigrant. all 100% true. the cops just laughed and said... hehe.. take a number. we havent got time for this.... there is no evidence. nothing we can do sorry. we can take your statement and get back to you in 8-12 months but only if we need more info.
the next day he remembered she had hit him about 8 months ago. the police gave him a 4 our interview took 2 statements, tracked her via mobile phone (as she was an illegal and had no known address) and arrested her.
when they do arrest someone for drugs ive heard its becasue they want more funding or have had a tip off from DEA in the US. but i personally think they pick the victim out of a hat.
but if they knew schapelle was innocent they would certainly contact the indonesians with a wink and a nudge and say.... guys...better let her go.. we know who's behind this. and she would be free.
Schu, My point was to show how wrong Zacko facts are, local drugs in Bali ARE cheaper, the Corby's lawyer got a sample of the drugs, but they did not test it. Zack has seven facts listed only the first one is correct, Corby was found at the air port with drugs. She now will do the time.
Originally Posted by Schu
"...Not one person was ever found who knew of the Corbys as dealers, and the local dealing scene is well-understood by all those involved. Everyone spoken to said that if the Corbys were involved they would have known about that, and they didn't. Indeed, the police never even came up with a skerrick of evidence to demonstrate that. And once again, it is well understood that the police in Bali know of the drug dealers. Yet they didn't know of the Corbys..."
If anyone is still having difficulty understanding that Schapelle is not guilty of drug trafficking and is consequently suffering a gross miscarriage of justice, then the following is for you:
Have a think about what motivated Schapelle to obtain evidence (this is funadamental basics of criminology)!
Denpasar airport is plastered with signs saying "Death to Drug Smugglers". When Schapelle was apprehended at the airport, the first thing she demanded was that the luggage be reweighed. Why would a trafficker do this? Was Schapelle on a suicide mission? Did she want the customs officers to have comprehensive proof that she was a smuggler if the luggage weight didn't change from check-in to arrival?
Why did she want the luggage re-weighed: because she knew that doing so would clear her name.
The courts have said she is guilty, yet she is still maintaining her innocence. Guilty people pleading not guilty do not request evidence that they cannot control. And here is Schapellle requesting a plethora of evidence, the outcome of which she could not control: CCTV footage in Brisbane, Sydney and Bali (she could not control what these cameras showed and probably more importantly what they didn't show); x-ray images from Brisbane and Sydney; fingerprinting, dna analysis of the MJ, forensic analysis of the MJ and plastic bags... etc, etc. It would only take one piece of requested evidence to return an unfavourable outcome and her defence would collapse. So requesting multiple pieces of evidence would multiply the possibilities of an unfavourable outcome! So why do this if she was guilty? As it turned out a lot of the evidence/information she requested was not forthcoming, but that is not something she could have controlled.
Schapelle's motivation to obtain evidence leaves no doubt in my mind that she is not guilty.
And after 4 years, we have just learnt that at the EXACT same time she was in transit the plane carrying the cocaine landed. Put this in front of those judges and ask them if this is just an extraordinary coincidence, or whether this adds doubt to the safety of the conviction.
I am disgusted with the bottom of the gene pool armchair hangem judges on this forum.
good post explodGood post. Disbelievers ought to have a good read over this post of Ado and think it through. If you cant fathom the simple truth then print it off and discuss it with someone with a legal background.
Originally Posted by explod
Good post. Disbelievers ought to have a good read over this post of Ado and think it through. If you cant fathom the simple truth then print it off and discuss it with someone with a legal background.
Tell me this, when the customs officer asked her if it was her bag she said I AM IN TROUBLE AIN'T I, now if she had nothing to hide, why would she say that??Good post. Disbelievers ought to have a good read over this post of Ado and think it through. If you cant fathom the simple truth then print it off and discuss it with someone with a legal background.
I am disgusted with the bottom of the gene pool armchair hangem judges on this forum. Should round em up and deport to Indonesia, would change some attitudes real quick. But you are fellow Aussies and have the benefit of the doubt.
Tell me this, when the customs officer asked her if it was her bag she said I AM IN TROUBLE AIN'T I, now if she had nothing to hide, why would she say that??
My contact in Jakarta Ms.Tingtong hs been transferred to the UK Embassy of Indonesia and now lives in Tooting, a suburb of London. Prior to her departure she advised me you live somewhere between Lismore and Southport, areas of Australia I avoid as much as possible, due to the large numbers of bludgers who live in that space (excuse the pun)
She admitted ownership of the bag straight away. In fact, the customs officer initially thought it was her brother's bag because he was the one who dragged it over to the customs counter and Schapelle claimed ownership. She never said anything along the lines of "I am in trouble" at all.
Tell me this, when the customs officer asked her if it was her bag she said I AM IN TROUBLE AIN'T I, now if she had nothing to hide, why would she say that??
I liked that clip. It had party music.
Do you honestly think she is the only Australian not to have been dealt with harshly? Ever thought she may have taken responsibility for the crime of a member of her family?
Why wasn't there such an outcry for Van Nguyen? Why has this attracted all the groupies when there are arguably many many more worse injustices carried out within our own system, and in other countries?
I hope you got some Schu. It would give me a chuckle to know Zack has had his lunch cut.
Seriously, join Amnesty, deal with some real injustices, and get the **** out.
What! You mean someone like a 'Traffick Cop'?
I'd say it's just human nature. People see a terrorist sympathiser and think, oh no he he is being tortured, I have terrorist sympathies too, that could be me one day too. Better try and stop this.
Others just associate Corby with their little sister or some girl they had a crush on. Many actually have a crush on corby, it's evident from their illogical emotion filled posts.
Imagine renee Lawrence got busted doing what corby did. There would be not a peep from these activists.
There is no justice in the world, never was never will be. These activists are just trying to limit the injustice to the ugly, weak and the unpoular.
Noone ever walked free who was caught with a bag of drugs on their possession whilst crossing an international border. Neither will corby.
So the source of those threats to Schapelle if I don't stop posting has now tracked me down personally? Gosh. I'm honored, but in view of the inferred threat to my safety, I am so frightened. I am guessing that you are deluded, but if not (and I am addressing intelligent people here and not you) is this acceptable to ANYONE? A foreign regime attempting censorship of an Australian forum via this proxy guy?
Fortunately, you can see from the Tara Hack video, which has been hidden from the Australian public, that there are an increasing number of Brits who are concerned about the gross abuse of Schapelle Corby's human rights:
In fact that was even produced by a Brit. So in the interests of British security, I'll contact one of them and ask them to pass the details on to their government. I feel sure they will be interested to know that a member of staff there is operating in this manner and passing privately obtained information to a member of the public.Who knows, maybe they will be less sycophantic than the Australian government, and do something about it.
This is a fact of course, Schu. As such he will have trouble grasping it, as evidenced by his appalling posting history. The history is worth looking at as a study of what 4 years of media smear can do to the minds of certain susceptible people, of which there are a number on here. It's scary that some people are motivated like that, and must derive some twisted satisfaction from the misery and suffering of others.
For the new year, I hope on hope that someone gets her out of there very very soon. I hope as well that all those implicated in her suffering, are eventually exposed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?