If you want to analyze someone, take a look at the guy hiding behind the name 'pilot', for example. Almost all of his posts on ASF are clearly intended to hurt someone already suffering. Look at them. Ask yourself WHY someone would have such hatred in there heart for someone they have never met and who is living in misery.
Oh, and there is a formal request from her to the Consulate, ON record, to have the marijuana tested. Any comment to the contrary is smear and lie, and cannot be sourced other than through media smear.
Yet still he smears with lies to the effect that Schapelle Corby somehow stopped the testing (of course, without reference to something unambiguous and on record like a formal request), and smears with lies about her bag. Still he posts his hatred for a poor woman suffering in abject misery. What a nice and normal guy.
Really? Doesn't that strike you as vile, an afront to human rights, to hurt someone because some guy posts on a forum? No? That is ok is it, a civilised regime? I am the problem and not a foul regime that treats human beings like that? Or are you trying your own brand of censorship on behalf of your foul friends? A 'shut up or we will hurt her' message?
Well? I am waiting for an answer to this, Mr Well-Connected-With-Jakarta. Your foul friends in that regime, who are threatening to hurt an Australian citizen because some guy is posting on a forum - are you trying to censor this message board on their behalf?
Does anyone consider that sort of vile thinly-veiled threat to be civilized? Well? THINK ABOUT IT.
And yes, of course the 'trial' was political/racist (even the above threat illustrates this). Or is it normal for the president of a country to intervene via well timed media comments, for a sentence to bear no resemblance at all to the facts of a crime, for the human rights of the accused to be abused on a daily basis? The world can see this, even if the Australian media has done a hatchet job on her in her own country:
And no apology for posting that clip again - people need to actually read the WORDS in it and consider all those media reports over the years, and which part of that process they fit into. People need to think about why, and look at media ownership/interests and politics, and learn understand what words are used to report smear, versus fact. Then look at some of the posters on here, dutiful reporting as facts what the media have produced as smear.
Then the reality of Schapelle Corby's terrible suffering, whilst we even have horrible threats via people like Mr Well-Connected-With-Jakarta to try to stop these issues even being raised.