- Joined
- 2 October 2006
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reactions
- 2
Well, I don't think the article helps to explain anything. This was reported a week ago. The company actually overdelivered on their target. The 1 million ounces target is for 2010. Ambitious? Sure. But they haven't underdelivered yet...HRL said:Good article. That helps to explain the slide. Why would anyone buy a 'troubled' company from it's own industry then not push to at least sit on the board? Don't seem to be rushing to meet the management team either. Weird. I would have thought you would want to put your own knowledge and expertise to work (and quickly) to get the company going again... unless they bought in for some other reason. And throwing up a huge production target only to massively underdeliver is an interesting tactic! What are these guys doing?
I would call it a little ambitious since they only have about 7m oz in reserves atm. They ´ll have to buy into some serious deposits to ramp up to this level. Even if they take BDG we don ´t know what ´s really there. So, acquisition of current miners or those ramping up to production is probably the only way IMO.rub92me said:Well, I don't think the article helps to explain anything. This was reported a week ago. The company actually overdelivered on their target. The 1 million ounces target is for 2010. Ambitious? Sure. But they haven't underdelivered yet...
Kennas...tell me, has not ED delivered as promised and what I ,or, you call is immarterial...SBM has one of the best ground in Australia for GOLD and looks like the Sullivan which has a 18km strike length for NICKEL...SBM maybe ambitious but so far the company has delivered...if you wish to show us how you came upon your opinion please post..as its only an opinion nothing else...see their lates report..where the Sullivan was mentioned...as SBM will also gear up for Nickel mining..its all there to read..and not an opinionkennas said:I would call it a little ambitious since they only have about 7m oz in reserves atm. They ´ll have to buy into some serious deposits to ramp up to this level. Even if they take BDG we don ´t know what ´s really there. So, acquisition of current miners or those ramping up to production is probably the only way IMO.
SBM...purchased the GOLD assets NOT THE company....court ruling DOES NOT affect SBM......HRL said:Hmmm, this is a big call to allow shareholders the same status as creditors against a failed company and way bigger than just Sons of Gwalia.
Anyway, didn't SBM only purchase the assets from the gold division rather than the entire company? If so then the $38m SBM paid to Sons of Gwalia should have been used to pay debts to creditors and therefore this ruling shouldn't have any impact on SBM at all. If SBM did actually buy the whole company then thats another story...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?