This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Sarah Palin: The Barracuda

does pee freeze quicker than water in Alaska?
salt content would mean it freezes slower. .

All the more reason not to piss against the wind as (you and) Palin are arguably doing.

:topic
Speaking of going "on the piss"

Here's what the Bible says ...
Drink water from your own cistern, flowing water from your own well. (The Book of Proverbs 5:15)*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urophagia

Not sure about Alaska, but just over the ditch in Siberia, they have been known to "hit the piss" - to get a second high from the magic mushrooms they had yesterday...

 
Ok... I know Palin is merely a puppet of the McCain campaign and is seducing her party by doing what they want.

And she probably does not know what 'they' write and she reads.
I give her the benefit of the doubt as she does not have a reputation for reading current affairs.

McCain is not young so he probably forgets what his party did to him in his 2000 campaign.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/opinion/12rich.html
 
Informed opinion is common sense. But common sense is not too common it seems.

Palin backers are rejoicing that the Troopergate Report did not lay charges on her and claim it was a political stunt!
Hmmm... Doesn't - 10 Republicans + 4 Democrats = bipartisan report!?



The state Ethics Act holds that public officials have a duty of public trust that prevents them from attempting to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action.


* The report made no specific recommendations on penalties or how to proceed.

* Further action would be up to the state personnel board, which is carrying out a separate inquiry.

Civil penalties range, theoretically, from impeachment by the Legislature to a reprimand or a fine of up to $5,000 by the state personnel board, but most legislative sources thought it unlikely any action would be taken.



BTW... Palin demanded Wooten be charged as he had shot a female moose without a permit.

Monegan investigated and found: Palin's sister had a permit for the moose and was present when it was shot.
Palin's father had butchered the moose.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-troopergate11-2008oct11,0,192217.story
 

It seems McCain's camp doesn't read newspapers either! ... birds of a feather

Surely they'd have a copy of the official outcome - which newspapers have quoted.

This statement looks quite silly embedded with pertinent 'facts' in the WSJ:


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122364495587222887.html
 
am I missing something? is it some personal thing against Palin or the republicans or whatever? fact remains, there is a lot of personal vilification going on in this thread ... not just against Palin but against one another.

you are all supposed to be good mates, not call each other names. otherwise you will find yourselves banned for quite a fair length of time & who wants that to happen?

oh & by the way: many years ago I wrote a book with that lady from Q'ld ... please explain ... in mind - a sexdoll in her image takes centre stage for a while. its called Karleen MP. a few copies to give away for light relief, anyone. first three, for free ....

it was actually the first thing that struck me about Palin ... the resemblance.

what was it John Laws used to say: be kind to each other!
 

It is called Palin Derangement Syndrome. It is so over the top. The same people that are shocked when something is uttered against Obama, are way way way more over the top against McCain and especially Palin. It is unhealthy. There will be many heart attacks on the left when McCain/Palin pull this one out.

Yesterday on TV, some Obama pundit was foaming at the mouth and calling Palin racist because she calls herself a hockey mom. Why was he so upset? Well, his reasoning was that this was a code word term against blacks. You see, as he said "Blacks don't play hockey, so the term is not inclusive". Crazy stuff. The hate and anger is coming much more from the left than from the right.

Go to the comments sections on any articles on the Huffington Post, Democraticunderground and ANY other left wing site in America (and undoubtedly Australia too - all leftists are alike, wherever they are) and see the spit and anger. Thousands and thousands of unhinged comments.
 

Actually, what shocked me the most was the violent intent of many of the hard right respondents in the comments following the article. The many calls to "bear arms" and "stand up & fight for what's right" (literally - not figuratively) sounds like a call to revolution.

You say it is not Republicans who are gripped by insane rage? Did you even bother to read the various Republican respondent's comments? Or did you just blindly follow the tenet of the article's author?

I'll say one thing as an "outside observer". This campaign does appear to be turning into one of the most devisive elections in Americas history.

Whoever wins, that won't be good news for the incoming President.

Take a chill pill, man.


aj
 
Which side is REALLY "Gripped by insane rage?" It is not Republicans, as the media would lead you to believe.
Open this link, and be shocked:
This is so wrong.


The propaganda on this waste-of-time site was 99.9% from/on 2004-5.
What does that have to do with Obama?
His self-constructed brief is based on annihilating that sort of destructive divisive rot from politics.

As one blogger pointed out, some aspects need to be centralized by federal gov't eg food labelling, defence.
I would add healthcare. Argue the policies and stop stooping to petty lies and distortions!

You fooled me twice! Never again shall I waste my time and read your sick sites! I've tried to see your side.

This blogger from that site is the essence of common sense and reality:
 
"Oh come on. There are deranged loons on both sides"
:

Halloween is coming up they could be just practicing for the big day to scare the wits out of each other!!! Candy Corn and Toffee Apples all round!

They won't see each other for the trees!!

 
Palin: 'Very much appreciating being cleared of any legal wrongdoing or unethical activity at all'

It seems incredible to me that Palin can so blatantly lie about the Troopergate Report!
Why doesn't she just promote the parts of the report that favour her and omit the guilty parts? - Lie by omission?
... but then she does do this, when asked if she did 'anything' wrong - she skirts the question.

Does she think folk do not read newspapers? ... only listen to her comments on radio and TV interviews?
Does she really think people won't notice that her lies reflect her dishonesty?


On the left, on the bottom of the first page, you can click to hear her interview with Alaskan radio stations:

http://community.adn.com/adn/node/132625

The full script of her interview is below the audio button.
 
When the Secret Service stepped in to 'keep an eye on supporters who threaten to harm Obama at McCain-Palin rallies', McCain, it seems, 'reformed' by saying Obama was a good, family man... no need to be scared of him as president - in his effort to also present himself as decent and honorable.

But the campaign's speech notes were more subtle for Palin's attacks!
They're letting her pit bull traits shine through and carry on the innuendo... (last night, our time):


Did folk hear Obama say in two debates - 95% will get tax relief - no tax increase under $250k income.
Did they not notice that McCain did not deny he wants $billions more in tax relief for the weathy?
Bottom-up versus top-down economic regeneration!

Her tough talk on Obama’s relationship with William Ayers and views on abortion were excluded, other than a passing message to Obama’s opposition to a ban on late-term abortions, which elicited chants of, “Killer” from the crowd.

Did they not hear Obama stress that abortion is a state issue?
Wouldn't Palin KNOW that? ... or at least her speech-writers should have!

She tried to offload Bush's record from McCain:
McCain would take on wasteful spending and abuses of power as president.

So subtly she encouraged a continuation of anger in her flock:
I wonder if she winked!

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/10/12/1537565.aspx
 
Three and a half hours without any left wing hate against Sarah Palin from either Doris or Green08,

It must be a record.

gg
 
those who support those terrorists who would seek to destroy all that it is that we value, those are the bad guys, OK?”

good one doris

"so let's hear it folks ...

Ray for the good guys RAYYYYY !
Boo for the bad guys BOOOOOO !"

Here endith the Epistle. (e-pisstake?)

God she's hopeless lol - still I'm sure those without any education whatsoever will enjoy her bs.
 
Three and a half hours without any left wing hate against Sarah Palin from either Doris or Green08,

It must be a record.

gg

GG you said you were going roo shooting? hope you decimate the local pig/cat/fox populations along the way
 
Three and a half hours without any left wing hate against Sarah Palin from either Doris or Green08,
It must be a record.gg

Good God you've risen from the dead (sorry bed). You are determined to take shots at Doris and I - no one else, selective misogynist.

Swilling cheap beer and the hostie with the mostie must have gone down well with your wife?
 
Good God you've risen from the dead (sorry bed). You are determined to take shots at Doris and I - no one else, selective misogynist.

Swilling cheap beer and the hostie with the mostie must have gone done well with your wife?

Mate my third wife and I split up. She went down to live in a permaculture show near Nimbin. She's a nice girl, and we remain friends and still email each other.

The one thing that pisses her off is the large number of hairy legged humourless feminists down there who hate men.

I can give you the address if you want it. You'd fit in like Flynn.

gg
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...