Lumpy payments do not equal lumpy profits because revenues are recognised in the period which the work is done. Cashflow however can be lumpy due to timing of payments.
I run a mile away from anyone who delivers a bad half. Yes it might very well be just a rough patch. But my theory is that the market isn't in the mood to give out benefit of the doubt... and you can always jump back on when they release the next positive guidance (which is how I jumped on ZGL back in Feb).
Hmmmm this humble pie does not taste too good. I may be wrong but I could have made a mistake in not recalculating IV in relation to the soft half. Having said that I think the sell off was overdone and I still got ZGL at a discount - just not as large a discount as I thought.
You bring the price into the equation because it is the price you pay. You can have the most profitable, high growth and fantastic company in the world...but you will only get subpar return unless you buy them at a fair or low price.
The PE gives you the quickest answer on whether it is cheap or not. Based on your assessement on things like ROE, cashflow and earnings per share, a company deserves a certain PE. You can look around for similar peers to make such assessment. In other words, low PE is your margin of safety. I am not saying buy a stock because it has a low PE, I am saying buy a good company when it has a low PE. And better still, buy a good company when it has a low PE and is about to experience some catalyst to move up.
This could turn into rather a long winded discussion and if it is ok with you I would rather have it at another time.
Anyway.... all my opinion of course and my portfolio is also being torn to pieces like everything else. I hope I don't sound too critical in my post and good luck with the investments
I love criticism it is a big reason I started this thread. To have to justify my investments it makes me think about them all the harder and maybe sometimes someone will pick up something I miss like for example ZGL