Realist
Billie Jean is not my lover
- Joined
- 1 June 2006
- Posts
- 2,057
- Reactions
- 3
Julia said:RIN is a good example of how the SP is not dependent on the quality of the company and is why I don't get too carried away with enthusiasm when someone talks about buying a company on which they have done all the research and concluded it is "undervalued" and therefore must make them money.
All it takes is some negative housing data to come out of the US and the SP plummets, then some more positive data is released, and woop de doo, the SP takes off again.
The company hasn't done anything differently in the meantime, except possibly to point out that their business is not entirely dependent on US housing.
Julia
Hi Julia, I think you are confusing intrinsic value with market sentiment..
They are two completely different entities.
The intrinsic value of RIN is a debatable topic, but many agree the fair value of its shares is above $13. Hence why I bought and why many many others bought around or just under $13.
You are confusing the intrinsic value or fundamental value with market sentiment. Of course RIN will go up and down slightly on daily news. Every share does. And no-one can predict it or plan for it.
The fact is unless some terrible fundamental problem occurs RIN wont drop much further below $13 because it is slightly undervalued at the moment.
And it will over the longterm all going as expected go up.
But day to day it'll fluctuate according to market sentiment which no-one can predict.
Over the shortterm market sentiment wins, over the longterm value always wins.