wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,951
- Reactions
- 13,244
Whoa! The strawman returns! LOLOf course and raise the name of Aussies far more in front of cricket lovers.
Good work mate. Would you also shed some tears for the abnormal originals of Australians who were killed vehemently by the invading pirates from outside Australia some 200 years back ? None of my business as I do not what happened then. Just curious to see your love and affection for the bookies and hence Bucknor.
It surely brings the "experts" out of the woodwork...those of the sycophantic type ruled by politcal correctness gone silly and a deprecating piety (you did call yourself Arminius) to a cricket higher being...
Memories are short,
Symonds has been involved in a running feud with Indian paceman Shantha Sreesanth during the tour of the subcontinent.
[/I]
Who were those gentlemen assuring us that there was no malintent by the term "monkey" applied to Symonds?
And...
Was that a turbaned gentleman rolling over the ground in celebration at a significant point in the match? Is that the way Aussies have to celebrate then?
I may not agree with some of Ponting's strategies but he is an effective captain, captaining a team in the 21st century...
By the way, ICC now means Indian Cricket Council?
And not to mention a segue of Anna Coren-like proportions!Whoa! The strawman returns! LOL
Now suppose they only have Indian witnesses ? - how would we feel if they found hoggy gulty? (of anything serious - not talking about a minor sledge)India brings conduct charges against Hogg
Posted 5 hours 15 minutes ago
Updated 4 hours 59 minutes ago
The manager of India's cricket side has brought code of conduct charges against Australian spinner Brad Hogg, as tensions over the second Test in Sydney continue to boil over.
Chetan Chauhan has accused Hogg of making an offensive remark to Indian captain Anil Kumble and vice-captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni during India's second innings.
A group of sporting legends plan to complain to Cricket Australia that the behaviour of Ricky Ponting's cricket team is damaging Australia's international reputation.
Sport Australia Hall of Fame members John Bertrand, Herb Elliott and Rob de Castella are among those angry at the behaviour of the Australian cricket team in the wake of the controversial second Test in Sydney last week.
The cricket team was accused of bad sportsmanship in their narrow win over India.
Bertrand, chairman of the hall of fame, said the group would seek an urgent meeting with Cricket Australia because Australia's Test team was damaging international relations with its "win at all costs" attitude.
"Sport is only sport. It's not war," Bertrand told News Limited newspapers.
"Both Rob and Herb feel very strongly about this issue.
"We will be seeking a meeting with Cricket Australia to seek to get the Australian team to readjust their behaviour so that they do show respect for their opponents."
AFL hero Ron Barassi agreed with the hall of famers.
"It concerns me that the Australians are regularly being referred to as being arrogant and because it is mentioned so often, you begin to wonder," he said.. etc
Absolutely woeful, disgusting and revolting.
As a sports official myself, words cannot describe how angry this makes me.
Bucknor is one of the best umpires going around. It's such a shame the ICC is subservient to the BCCI.
What message does this send?
a) It's ok to abuse sports officials, you'll get away with it and even rewarded
b) We don't value the contribution our officals make to the game
c) Don't make a call against India, you may get the boot
d) If India doesn't win, it's not their fault but someone else’s
e) The umpires are no longer independent
f) The ICC are redundant
g) All of the above
The ICC has a very rigorous performance assessment framework for their umpires. If Bucknor was found to be under-performing versus a set of benchmarks, then I’m all for him to be cut. What I’m not in favour of is teams being allowed to get away with bullying umpires.
He is on the ICC's elite panel.Ludicrous statement. Bucknor is one of the worst umpires around. He has been a dead man walking for at least the past 12 months. Everyone in the game knows that he is well past his sell by date. I would guess that even the Australian cricket team would agree (but not openly)
He is on the ICC's elite panel.
Which means nothing. He is a nice guy. Let's not confuse that with professional competence. If he was a player he would have been dropped months ago.
As a side point, who out there think that Singh's amazing success with the ball against Ponting, influenced Ponting's decision to dob Singh in for racism and thereby try to get him banned?
I think Bucknor's 'performance' in the Sydney test was the final straw for India.
As a side point, who out there think that Singh's amazing success with the ball against Ponting, influenced Ponting's decision to dob Singh in for racism and thereby try to get him banned?
Which means nothing. He is a nice guy. Let's not confuse that with professional competence. If he was a player he would have been dropped months ago.
Most of the guys in jail are probably nice guys but fact remained they were convicted due to criminal offences.
His Highness Mr Ricky Ponting is the nicest guy and his value for ethics, integrity is unquestionable. Since his team mates like Hussey, Gilly and Hayden are behind him 100%. Here is a specimen attached to show Ricky's integrity. Does any one remember Shakespeare's Julius Caeser and the speech of Mark Antonio ? "I am here to bury Caeser and not to praise him. Brutas was a holy man. Etc" . So Ricky is a holy man for some of us. (See photo).
Ironically my earlier detailed post was probably deleted by system fault screening . Probably it was too much for the system to swallow being a Ricky Fan. Fact remains that the action of Ricky, Bucknaor has made the Australians under microscope. It is a result of many years of abuse against all visitors when they come in Australia. Indian reaction was basically a volcanic eruption of the anger and frustration of many years. There are many Australians who support Indian actions as all of them wanted to see a good cricket for which the money is paid by the spectators and sponsors. THe players are forgetting that they are servicing the audience and sponsors to behave and play good cricket.
Does any one understand Monkey in Hindi is Hanuman who is worshipped by many Hindus in India ? Of course the stature of Symmonds does nto qualify him to be a God so he rightly thought it was a racist comment. It was Harbhazan' s fault who being a non Hindu person compared Symmond with a Hindu God which should not have been done. When Australians called SriLankans as black monkeys - was okay however.
http://publication.samachar.com/pub...l/ibnlive.php&homeurl=http://www.samachar.com
Fact remains good cricket has been assasinated by some people who did not understand the ramification of the murder. It divided the cricket lovers into two groups. It has done a great disservice to many of us (we should be discussing stocks and not cricket - what a waste of time by all of us now).
I posted that previously. Given the Aussies determinedness to win at all costs, including cheating (clarke's and ponting's catch) who in their right mind would believe them?
Especially Symonds, who for no reason walked up to Singh... and has admitted effectively he has absolutely no credibility when it comes to honesty...
No. Darrell Hair got sacked because he accused a team of something which was PROVEN not to be the case, and was also proven he had no evidence for.As for Steve Bucknor being dropped, I think it is a growing trend for counties to get the umpires they want.
Darrell Hair can't umpire Pakistan or basically anywhere on the sub continent and now bucknor is the same.
Chops, whats your problem? Ponting turned down a catch of Dravid, saying he wasn't sure after Dravid started walking. Then he caught Dhoni brilliantly of Hogg, as replays show it touching Dhoni's finger. And who the F*** said Clarkes catch wasn't a catch. You truly are a Dorker.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?