- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,689
- Reactions
- 1,233
Do you truly believe all that you have said here?
Do you truly believe all that you have said here?Philosophies aren’t ‘chosen,’ they are arrived at via logic - debate was something that was utterly devoid in every post you made.
Your morbidly mind numbing blind faith was what you adhered to at every turn. Your chosen twaddle is as far away from philosophy and genuine debate as a thing can be.
Your view unflinchingly remained devoid of understanding and insight into what ever was said.
For those bothering to reply to what you, only found that they may as well have been trying to explain something to a chipmunk.
Your still here -
View attachment 85567
Perhaps, I missed something as most of it was unbearable to read. So I have no evidence to the contrary.Do you truly believe all that you have said here?
What do you think it was, about my postings, that rendered them "unbearable to read"?Perhaps, I missed something as most of it was unbearable to read. So I have no evidence to the contrary.
I am glad that I am not!Usually the way they began, I wouldn't get much further.
I hope you are young.
Because I understood so much less when I was younger.Why?
Because I understood so much less when I was younger.
If only you were a comic
That was hilarious Cynic. I had quite a few loud laughs this week actually...
The claim to superiority of secular morality.
Anything that changes over time (like universes) must have a beginning. It's a breach of the laws of physics to say that physical properties like mass and energy always existed. A god would be outside the laws of physics because the god would have created those laws in the first place.
Don't know how morality actually applies in atheism. It's like saying a fox (we're like animals) is immoral for killing 50 rabbits on an island ,even if it weren't hungry. That is why secularism allows for e..g killing an 8 month unborn baby by stabbing it in the head (very gruesome). We certainly have less human dignity in secularism.
1, but why does the “beginning” require s god
2, wouldn’t this god still exist in its own demension, subject to that demensions laws of physics, and wouldn’t that demension require a beginning and therefore a god?
There are many things about Christian faith that are immoral.
Secular morality is far superior.
If those "modern religious people" interpreting their texts, are theists, from whence could they possibly have acquired these "secular morals"? i.e. how could such people, come to be possessed, of any kind of secular morality?That’s easy, over time humans have become more and more moral, where as the religious texts remain unchanged for 100’s or 1,000’d of years.
In fact without their secular values, religious people tend to go and commit all sorts of nasty acts which their texts condone.
The only reason less of he bad biblical instructions are followed is because most modern religious people use their secular morals to interpret their texts.
Nobody knows what the beginning required. You have said you don't know, I am saying that intelligent creation is a possibility, but you seem to have ruled this out.
A god would probably exist in all dimensions, but laws of physics only apply to physical objects, and a god is not likely to be physical.
If those "modern religious people" interpreting their texts, are theists, from whence could they possibly have acquired these "secular morals"? i.e. how could such people, come to be possessed, of any kind of secular morality?
Can secular morality be objectively defined?
And how could any true Christian, other than a masochist, commit "all sorts of nasty acts" when their religious doctrine instructs them to treat everyone the way they themselves would like to be treated.
In light of this, where within your perception of secular morality, may one find an instruction so lofty, as to warrant claims to the moral superiority of secular wisdom?
I am saying that intelligent creation is a possibility,
If those "modern religious people" interpreting their texts, are theists, from whence could they possibly have acquired these "secular morals"? i.e. how could such people, come to be possessed, of any kind of secular morality?
Can secular morality be objectively defined?
And how could any true Christian, other than a masochist, commit "all sorts of nasty acts" when their religious doctrine instructs them to treat everyone the way they themselves would like to be treated.
In light of this, where within your perception of secular morality, may one find an instruction so lofty, as to warrant claims to the moral superiority of secular wisdom?
How do you know it’s a possibility?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?