- Joined
- 24 May 2009
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 255
Oh, ok . I get it now. Your trying to say that these disparate facts your mentioning are evidence that we are living inside a giant life form, much like microbes live in us.
Well that might make a good sci fi film, But I think that all it is science fiction. I certainly don't think the things you listed as evidence are evidence for what you are suggesting.
Cynic has been a strident apologist and protagonist for the religious cause here. He is not a neutral poster, many of his statements here do not deserve the respect and praise you seem to think they are due. Read such sophistry with a more critical mind.FX, many that have contributed have not been religious, and they have been shot down, cynic being one.
Pure intellectual dishonesty there Tink. The religious do not just profess to have an opinion, they claim to possess absolute truth about origins, God and eternal life in the form of fantastic claims in iron-age scrolls, the non-belief in which leads to eternal damnation. Such incredible arrogance can and must be challenged.We are all entitled to our opinions, and you wonder why people don't say things in forums when you say things like that.
You're really referring to faith here, the strong belief in claims made on bad evidence and experiences imagined to be of Godly origin. This is at best self-delusion.As I said, I have my beliefs and have had my own experiences.
Let's take a slightly different tack.
We are currently experimenting with artificial intelligence, pieces of software that we allow to observe their surroundings, and make inferences and decisions on the basis of what they observe and the rules that we lay down for them. In time they may be able to think for themselves and determine the physics behind how they operate, but they exist only in the world of a silicon chip. We, their creators, are outside their physical universe but we control it, and they operate on the rules that we provide them. We may decide to reveal ourselves to them, but that would ruin an interesting experiment would it not ? Just how far can our creations develop on their own?
Well it did take you a while, but it's great to see that you were finally able to recognise what I was actually saying!Oh, ok . I get it now. Your trying to say that these disparate facts your mentioning are evidence that we are living inside a giant life form, much like microbes live in us.
You are entitled to think whatever you like. Just please remember that our conflicting viewpoints are exactly that, no more and no less.Well that might make a good sci fi film, But I think that all it is science fiction. I certainly don't think the things you listed as evidence are evidence for what you are suggesting.
Well if you want to allow your personal philosophy to dictate a filtered view of science and scientific method, I won't stop you, just don't expect me to agree with very much of what you have to say about science or anything science related.the universe is under intense investigation, at as far as I am aware nothing points to us being part of your sci fi story.
FX, many that have contributed have not been religious, and they have been shot down, cynic being one.
We are all entitled to our opinions, and you wonder why people don't say things in forums when you say things like that.
As I said, I have my beliefs and have had my own experiences.
We are not going to agree, so leave it at that.
Cynic has been a strident apologist and protagonist for the religious cause here. He is not a neutral poster, many of his statements here do not deserve the respect and praise you seem to think they are due. Read such sophistry with a more critical mind.
Pure intellectual dishonesty there Tink. The religious do not just profess to have an opinion, they claim to possess absolute truth about origins, God and eternal life in the form of fantastic claims in iron-age scrolls, the non-belief in which leads to eternal damnation. Such incredible arrogance can and must be challenged.
You're really referring to faith here, the strong belief in claims made on bad evidence and experiences imagined to be of Godly origin. This is at best self-delusion.
but that scientific evidence does exist nonetheless!
.
The evidence exists, But it doesn't in any way point to the outcome you are suggesting, I fear you have succumb to confirmation bias, You want to believe a hypothesis is possible, and you have found these disparate facts to try and knit together to make it sound plausible.
On the subject of "faith". I've yet to see a single poster to this thread that hasn't demonstrated an enormous amount of faith in their personal opinions!
Wrong! Please do not presume to know my mind!!
These surprising coincidences knitted together all by themselves, I was merely an observer!
I kept noticing patterns when being taught chemistry, physics and biology. Coincidences kept appearing as I was learning science. My former perception of the world became increasingly improbable in light of this information!
Eventually I had to acknowledge that humanity's popular view of themselves in relation to their universe was hopelessly improbable!
Hence I chose to align myself with what science was actually telling me!!!
Define faith
Repetition of fallacious assertions, ridiculous analogies and fantastic religious claims by yourself and others here does unfortunately require some repetition on my part in retort. The religious bring quite enough material to consider here, absent credible evidence of course. I'll defer to the religious here for creative content, their vivid imaginations and lack of critical thinking allows scope for all manner of mystical expression.Thanks for that FX. Have you got any new material for us? I believe that you've already said most of this several times already. You're getting a bit boring!
Equating the endeavours of scientists over the millennia to better understand the natural order to the incredible tales in religious texts including talking serpents, virgin births, walking on water, resurrections etc. (things which directly conflict with science) is just more repetition of your sophistry here. Boring indeed.An intelligent person such as yourself should already be aware that much of the science technology you enjoy today is built on information that was passed down via many of the ancient writings that you so willingly snub! Talk about ingratitude!!
Coulombs law and Newtons Law of gravity.I am not claiming to know your mind, you said it your self, you think there is evidence we are living in a larger life form.
Humans are very good at noticing patterns, and when you suffer from confirmation bias, as i suspect you do, you will see patterns when no true patterns exist.
We've been down this road before!!! I even gave you the dictionary definition and root derivation of the word!!Have you already forgotten our earlier dialogue during the science is a religion debate!
Guess most of you have heard by now of the tragic loss of the Malaysian airliner over the Russian/Ukrainian border, brought down (they think) by a surface to air missile, killing more than 230 people.
At least a dozen times so far this morning I must have heard ‘Our thoughts and prayers are with the families of the victims’.
Thoughts and prayers???!!! I’m sure the grieving relatives are in our thoughts – what a terrible thing to lose loved ones in such horrific circumstances. But prayers?? – what good exactly are prayers going to do? Why do people persist with the foolish notion that prayers are somehow going to help in situations like this!
Coulombs law and Newtons Law of gravity.
Reaction of Petroleum with oxygen and it's products by vehicles travelling on "arterial" roads, glucose reacting in our blood stream producing the same chemical outputs.
Multiple descending levels of life observable under a microscope, seemingly oblivious to a higher life form (us) observing them.
Yeah right! No patterns to be found at all!! Please learn some actual science and stop wasting my time!
Repetition of fallacious assertions, ridiculous analogies and fantastic religious claims by yourself and others here does unfortunately require some repetition on my part in retort. The religious bring quite enough material to consider here, absent credible evidence of course. I'll defer to the religious here for creative content, their vivid imaginations and lack of critical thinking allows scope for all manner of mystical expression.
I do not recall ever making definite claims about the specific phenomena to which you refer ("talking serpents, virgin births etc.). I do claim that there is a lot of evidence of intelligence and wisdom in various parts of many of the religious texts. However, given that these texts have been passed down throughout the ages via diverse cultures, languages etc. and as such are subject to misinterpretation. Hence the need to exercise the utmost care and discernment in the examination and interpretation of such texts.Equating the endeavours of scientists over the millennia to better understand the natural order to the incredible tales in religious texts including talking serpents, virgin births, walking on water, resurrections etc. (things which directly conflict with science) is just more repetition of your sophistry here. Boring indeed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?