His comments come as censors in Indonesia rejected the blockbuster film because of its portrayal of a religious figure.
The big-budget film, which opens in Australia on Thursday, has been blocked by censors in Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates because it could offend Muslim viewers by depicting a prophet.
Indonesia followed on Monday with a unanimous decision by the Indonesian Censorship Board.
Crowe says he understands the reaction of some countries but he’s angry that Noah’s biggest critics haven’t even seen the film.
‘‘When you know that in the Koran Noah is a prophet, and you also know in the Islamic world you’re not supposed to render any artworks or images of a prophet ... you know certain countries are going to be banning this film when it comes out, so you understand that.
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/russell-crowe-film-noah-banned-in-indonesia-20140325-35f47.html#ixzz2wxOOKduQ
AL-QAEDA is urging jihadists returning from Syria to bomb British sporting events attended by the Queen.
The terror group recommends that “lone wolf” bombers use explosives linked to a timer or remote device to cause “maximum carnage” at events including the Epsom Derby, Wimbledon and FA Cup Matches.
The Sunday Times reported the grisly call to arms was outlined in online magazine, Inspire, produced by Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).
“This type of car bomb is not usually used to destroy buildings, but is very effective in killing individuals,” the group wrote.
It singled out high-profile sporting events in “crusader countries” England, France and America which are attended by “tens of thousands” of fans and tourists.
We’ve seen before how Saudi pundits find it easy to conflate atheism and terrorism, but now it’s official: Saudi Arabia’s new terrorism laws say outright that nonbelievers and others who commit thought crime are the same as violent terrorists.
Saudi Arabia Doubles Down on Atheism; New Laws Declares It Equivalent to Terrorism
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2014/03/31/saudi-arabia-doubles-down-on-atheism-new-laws-declares-it-equivalent-to-terrorism/
(Reuters) - Suspected Islamist militants killed at least 60 people in an attack on a village in northeast Nigeria, while a separate attack killed eight people at a teacher training college, witnesses said.
Boko Haram, which wants to carve an Islamic state out of Africa's most populous country, split roughly equally between Christians and Muslims, has killed thousands since launching an uprising in the northeast four and a half years ago.
Witnesses said the gunmen attacked the village of Kala Balge, near the Cameroon border, on Thursday, from several different quarters, shooting sporadically as terrified residents tried to flee.
In Islam, there's more than one way to be an 'atheist'
Saudi Arabia has declared atheists to be as bad as terrorists. But does this mean those without faith cannot live happily in the Muslim world?
Saudi Arabia recently declared atheism and Islamist terrorism equal crimes in the eyes of the law. To the Saudi government, not believing in God, and fighting in his name – although polar opposites – represent the same threat, a challenge to the religious consensus. What is it about atheism that it finds so challenging? And are different types of atheism possible in the Muslim world?
Despite the prominence of the image of a hunted apostate supported by western atheists and villified by Islamic institutions, there are atheists of Muslim heritage who would not necessarily identify with this stereotype. I would make the distinction between individual atheism as a matter of belief, and the position of publicly declaring oneself atheist – or, more potently, "ex-Muslim". The former is a personal position, the latter a political one that seeks to challenge authority.
In my experience, when it comes to atheism in the Muslim world, there is a conspiracy of sorts, akin to the "don't ask don't tell" principle on homosexuality in the US military –if a Muslim has lapsed, and no longer believes in God, there is no censure of that as long as one does not proselytise. Indeed, a 2012 poll by WIN-Gallup International found that up to 5% of Saudis polled identified as atheist, according to Sultan al-Qassemi, a number "comparable to the US and parts of Europe".
I view such oppression of non-belief as a logical extension of theocracy. Religious leaders know that the only real power they will ever have is right here on terra firma, and this is what they truly desire, power on earth to dictate what people should believe and how they should live their lives (aka religious tyranny). The modus operandi of the major faiths, Christianity and Islam, is to establish a theocratic order in society based on the imprimatur of religious authorities. In this regard, the motives of Islamic leaders are just more transparent than their Christian counterparts.I think if it hadn't been for oil, this country would still be in the Bronze-Age.
An American TV evangelist showing his disappointment that stoning gays to death is no longer an option http://www.queerty.com/pat-robertson-thinks-jesus-never-would-have-baked-a-gay-wedding-cake-20140326 If you look carefully at the Bible, what would have happened in Jesus time if two men decided they wanted to cohabit together? Roberston asked. They would have been stoned to death. So Jesus would not have baked them a wedding cake nor would he have made them a bed to sleep in because they wouldnt have been there. Robertson then added: But we dont have that in this country here so thats the way it is.
That doesn't seem quite reasonable. There's some excellent journalism around. People like Hedley Thomas who have investigated matters no one else was prepared to touch and who has ferreted out much that people would have preferred stayed hidden.I hate journalism in general.
Their primary goal is to create controversy, hate and make people look stupid.
Unethical job.
That doesn't seem quite reasonable. There's some excellent journalism around. People like Hedley Thomas who have investigated matters no one else was prepared to touch and who has ferreted out much that people would have preferred stayed hidden. I understand what you mean, however. The tendency to ignore what is important in favour of getting hysterical about minutiae is beyond irritating.
This particular story is a non-event.
He said that Jesus wouldn't have baked them a cake and that they would have been stoned before that.
When he says, " that's the way it is today though" he is referring to gay marriage. He is basically saying in that society it wouldn't have even come close to happening but today it does (and is probably expressing disappointment that that's the way it is).
Media beat up, slow news day... Call it what you like.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?