Spotless Review:
Spotless is a diversified services provider, covering the following brands:
• Spotless (Cleaning services)
• AE Smith / UASG (Engineering services)
• Asset Servies (Gov contracts)
• Clean Domain / Clean Event (Event Cleaning)
• Ensign / Taylors (Linen Cleaning)
• Epicure / Alliance / Mustard (Food Catering)
Back in 2014 Spotless IPO (It’s Probably Overpriced) first listed at $1.60, after being re- listed by Pacific Group Partners.
Initially we can see at June 2015, Spotless has over achieved from its ‘prospectus targets’, bolstering it’s SP to the $2 mark.
Overall the 2015 report seemed in line with the prospectus.
Heading into the 2016 Annual report it’s apparent why the share price took a major hit, with profit after tax down 14.5%, also in part from the prior year DTA that was reduced by about $50m. The worrying thing from the report is that while Spotless were able to increase sales,, they were unable to convert this into profit; which management likes to believe it was due to ‘Integration of new businesses’ (In reality this was just a failure to forecast and perhaps the likely gutting from private equity has taken effect).
The revenue changes in the various service divisions has been account for due to changing of contracts win or lose. The worrying thing presented within the report is that exsiting business performance has dramatically fallen, and whilst it promotes new acquisitions ans synergies, they account for a minor amount in the big picture – adding to this, it’s noted that ‘EBITDA from the existing Laundries business decreased by $18.5m or 22.1%, mostly as a result of performance and integration issues resulting from the recent acquisitions.
The underlying EBITDA margin in the Laundries business was impacted by integration issues flowing from the acquisitions with margins decreasing from 31.0% to 24.2%.’ It would be great if there was clarity around the ‘integration issue’.
It should be noted that Goodwill increased by 13% due to acquisitions, however I wouldn’t be surprised if this is just to make things look prettier, and wait for it to be impaired in a year or two.
Net leverage ratio increased; with debt subsequently increasing form 2015/16 – with low interest rates this isn’t all bad, however given the financials it appears they’re just using debt to buy unnecessary acquisitions, when they should be focusing on the core businesses.
Market Value = 1.08b
Net Assets = 827m
P/E = 8.91
Div: 3.5c (0% Franked) & 5c (30% Franked)
Pros:
• I learnt something outside of what the AFR provides.
Cons:
• Unable to calculate IV
• Unable to dig deeper into areas / a generic piece could have covered what I covered.
• Too Brief; yet didn’t want to ramble.
Anywhoo, Constructive criticism would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Mcgrath111