- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
The notion of handing more to the smaller sates goes back to Federation and is intended to offset the higher cost (per head of population) of providing services in these states.Qld does. They get a disproportion amount of the GST revenue, which NSW hates them for.
The notion of handing more to the smaller sates goes back to Federation and is intended to offset the higher cost (per head of population) of providing services in these states.
Only problem I can see is that I don't really see how Qld is a "small" state in any way. A poorly managed one yes, but with all those mines, people and so on I don't think anyone can really claim a lack of opportunity. Rather, it's a lack of taking advantage of that opportunity that is the problem.
I can see a case for financial help for NT, Tas, SA and WA with their small populations and, in WA, very large geographic area. Both of these things add to the cost of providing basic services. But Qld doesn't really fit the bill there, at least not while they're mismanaging the massive wealth they have let slip through their fingers.
Nothing against anyone in Qld, please don't take it personally. But it must take an awful lot of bungling for a mining state to end up broke immediately following such a massive boom. Even SA and Tas don't seem to be doing quite that badly, and they never had a boom to start with (unless you count crippling droughts as some sort of "boom").
Smurf, you're quite right. We in Qld are also wondering where all the massive wealth from mining has gone, especially when the govt increased royalties significantly about a year ago.
Re Qld receiving more of the GST I think that's supposed to be because there is such a constant influx of people from the other States, currently apparently about 1800 per week.
Certainly Labor have grossly mismanaged pretty much everything. But when I listen to Mr Springborg who says he is going to fund his so far quite extravagant promises by "an efficiency dividend" (no detail offered so far) I doubt the LNP will be much better.
gg, Lindy Nelson Carr seems to have been pretty OK as a local member, doesn't she?
The one person I'd really like to see thrown out is Health Minister Stephen Robertson. He has never acknowledged fault for anything and constantly whines excuses about everything being someone else's fault. Can't stand him.
I'm not at all surprised about the campaign poster issue at the service station. This sort of stunt will be happening by both sides all over the State.
So maybe for me I have to say Labor are responsible for all this
and I need to vote LNP.
Certainly Labor have grossly mismanaged pretty much everything. But when I listen to Mr Springborg who says he is going to fund his so far quite extravagant promises by "an efficiency dividend" (no detail offered so far) I doubt the LNP will be much better.
Trevor, that may well be fine if your area has an Independent worth voting for.I could only ever Vote for an Independent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?