prawn_86
Mod: Call me Dendrobranchiata
- Joined
- 23 May 2007
- Posts
- 6,637
- Reactions
- 7
From the horses mouth,
it would be really interesting to have someone giving us some real $figure on that: anyone with a knee reconstruction cost within full private cover?
And someone who went without private cover??
As I said my skin, nerve and vessel graft was just an endless list of above threathold so not covered;
Private insurance will at the most (and within limits) cover the gap between medicare paidback and a grossly undervalued figure supposed to be the "cost" of a procedure; you will soon discover that all decent surgeons, hospitals, etc are way above the medicare figure.
And I'll be keeping my health insurance too. I've never made any sort of claim, actually I don't even know how to go about claiming, but you never know what's around the corner. I've heard more than enough public hospital horror stories to know that I'll be keeping my health insurance.
Smurf, I'm sorry to hear of your experience. Hope you're soon quite well again.
Can you say how it was that you were taken directly to a private hospital in the first place? All the private hospitals I've ever known don't have an emergency/acute admission facility and people who have called for an ambulance are taken at least initially to the public hospital then arrangements made for transfer to private if appropriate medical personnel are available there.
Did you perhaps have your GP see you first and the admission was arranged by him/her?
I'm feeling reasonable now, a bit "spaced out" so hopefully this reads OK.Smurf, I'm sorry to hear of your experience. Hope you're soon quite well again.
Can you say how it was that you were taken directly to a private hospital in the first place?
First time I've ever been a patient in a private hospital. I'm quite happy with the standard of service, despite obviously costing me more than using the public system. That goes against my principles somewhat, I'd rather we had properly resourced public hospitals and just pay more tax or whatever is needed to make that happen, but unfortunately that's not the situation we have.
Red back spider on the toilet seat ??I'm feeling reasonable now, a bit "spaced out" so hopefully this reads OK.
UNPROVEN natural therapies will be stripped of government subsidies, amid signs private health insurers and their members have embraced the so-called alternatives to traditional medicine and driven up costs.
More than half of all Australians ”” about 13 million people ”” have general treatment policies, many of which now provide cover for alternative medicine and still attract the government rebate.
Under changes being considered for April 1, the rebate would be stripped from any policies covering natural therapies not supported by scientific evidence.
Documents obtained from the insurance regulator, the Private Health Insurance Administration Council, reveal natural therapies have been responsible for the biggest increase in benefits paid to members outside of hospital services ”” an incredible 345 per cent increase in 10 years.
The growing popularity of natural therapies ”” sometimes described as complementary, or alternative medicine, such as acupuncture, homeopathy, Chinese herbalism and various massage techniques ”” threatens to distort the market. It is putting pressure on premiums and drawing down more of the commonwealth’s *insurance rebate, which will soon cost taxpayers more than $6 billion a year.
First time I've ever been a patient in a private hospital. I'm quite happy with the standard of service, despite obviously costing me more than using the public system. That goes against my principles somewhat, I'd rather we had properly resourced public hospitals and just pay more tax or whatever is needed to make that happen, but unfortunately that's not the situation we have.
My attitude as well. I'd much rather see a better funded public system. I fear we're more and more headign towards US style health care here.
And apart from all that, I want my choice of doctor, not some less than fully qualified Registrar which is a choice you don't get in the public system.
And that's the only thing any of us are worried about. You live in a major city with access to the best standard of care. You don't need to have had anything to do with the surgeon as long as he's competent.. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't care who does my operation as long as they do it right.
It was particularly horrible for my father. I'm certain the ongoing embarrassment and "yuk factor' was a large part of his decision to commit suicide.Both cases sound horrible Julia, that was awful to go through.
Unfortunately, no, which is something I'm constantly concerned about. We have a brand new private hospital with the best of facilities but they have no emergency department. So there's simply no alternative to the public hospital for other than elective situations.If you had to be put in an ambulance at 3 AM in the morning, could you be taken to a much better private facility with better medics there? I mean, if you were conscious and could direct them to take you to that private facility would it be adequately staffed?
In cases like you describe for yourself where it seems you had plenty of warning, yes one could elect to go to the private hospital with private specialist who your GP would assure you was up to the job. Even then, the same principle applies to some extent about the best doctors wanting to stay where they converse and have ongoing training with their peers at teaching hospitals.
We have no cardiologist here, for example, which seems ridiculous in a town of 55,000 people many of whom are retirees.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?