jorgon
(Jeremy Gordon)
- Joined
- 7 September 2010
- Posts
- 26
- Reactions
- 0
There would seem to be two ways to achieve a change from individual trustees to a corporate trustee. First way: keep the existing fund with its existing TFN and ABN but change the structure from individual trustees to corporate trustee, transferring all the assets from the individual trustees to the corporate trustee. And second way: start an entirely new fund, register it with the ATO and get a new TFN and ABN for it and transfer-in to the new fund all the assets from the individual trustees. Either way the assets could be transferred in specie provided the new trust deed permits this as it should do, so the assets would not have to be sold. And either way you would need a completely fresh trust deed. This is because the wording of an SMSF trust deed which uses a corporate trustee is necessarily different in many respects from the wording of an SMSF trust deed which uses individual trustees.Ves; said:I have, for instance, seen other accountants advise that if you want a company structure you will need to set-up an entirely new fund to be able to change the shares in a Commsec account to reflect the new trustee name! (Not to mention that they were ignorant of the capital gains impact, the implications and documentation required to set-up and roll benefits into a new fund).
There is no reason why you can't be a member of two SMSFs at the same time, so you can form a new SMSF with a corporate trustee, and then transfer-in from your existing SMSF those assets which will incur no penalty on change of ownership (and you need to check that the trust deed of the existing SMSF permits this, and also check any tax implications).Julia; said:(The) term deposits would not only be cancelled but would be subject to penalty. Obviously I won't be going ahead under this circumstance, i.e. just on the term deposits losing 8% p.a. plus whatever the penalty is, and having to start over at much lower rate.
I now wish I'd gone the corporate trustee structure in the first place for the reason you offer. Always better not to have the involvement of any other person and the potential complications should that person drop dead or whatever.
Then when your term deposits mature, you can transfer-in that money. Finally you can close the existing SMSF.
You would have two lots of accountants and auditors fees for a while, but whether this is prohibitive depends on the size of your funds. Or perhaps your usual accountant and auditor would offer reduced fees for each?
I would generally agree that a corporate trustee is better for the reasons given. However there is one reason not to have a corporate trustee not mentioned so far: you cannot have minor children as members of an SMSF with a corporate trustee.Julia; said:Is there anyone who has a corporate trustee who could point out any disadvantage not so far considered?
Actually the additional fees involved are the one-off ASIC fee of $426 to register the corporate trustee as a company (this went up from $412 on 1 July), and the annual review fee of $42 (up from $41 on 1 July).village idiot; said:However I now know that the asic fee is $42, and there isnt anything else invloved that one couldnt do ones self, so happy to accept that I was wrong about the costs. So I would call that a success
I would agree that your home can be the registered office, indeed I would say this is preferable if you control the company because it means that you will receive all formal documents directly. You just have to remember to register a change with the ASIC if you move house so that the details are changed on the register.