- Joined
- 21 April 2005
- Posts
- 3,922
- Reactions
- 5
So what is political correctness, how did it start and how did it become so successful? Political correctness is first and foremost an attack on free speech, clear thinking and discussion. Political correctness is perpetrated by the left in politics as a cover for their flawed ideology - a sort of cultural Marxism. By cloaking their strange ideas under the cover of not wishing to offend anyone (which naturally appeals to peoples' better nature), they try to bypass debate and give a 'received wisdom' which must not be questioned. And anyone who disagrees with this 'received wisdom' must therefore be a really nasty person and deserves to be ostracised by their peers. This peer pressure is instrumental in enforcing and expanding political correctness.
Yes it is one of the failings of our language. We are christian and everythng is based on christianity in a very indirect way but we are secular in that religion and state are not one. The way it should be."Christian secular" is a pretty big oxymoron there Snake.
For most in Australia. And to an increasing extent in Japan where it is a disneyland like celebration.But Christmas has now transcended christianity and is really just a secular celebration for most.
That is the nature of the marxist isn't it?I doubt you will get many true lefties arguing against the stupid use of political correctness.
It is the biggest problem for a progressive society and will be the cause of continued decay. Surely we can have a critical look at things and call them what they are?After all, a lot of civil rights activists are angry at the use of it, as it actually stops the discussion and inhibits the progression of said rights. It's very difficult to discuss incarceration rates for aboriginals without some ninny crying foul for instance. But that just stops the discussion about what needs to be done.
What we do not need is fascism and the racist diatribe that goes along with that. Doesn't common sense rule out racism?But you do have to be careful about the anti political correctness argument being used as the thin end of the wedge to allow blatant racism to surface once again. Very difficult to separate the two though on a broad scale.
Please explain.Give it up and get a life Snakes.
Is it politically incorrect to discuss the negative aspects of political correctness?
It's a tough one this. It is good that we have tried to do things like remove pejorative racial/cultural tags in the name of PC, such as... well we all know what they are. But PCness so obviously goes way too far at times, as the various Xmas examples (and numerous others) show.
Where is the line? It's a bit fuzzy really. But totally agree that excess PC should be sternly addressed.
Lets juxtapose this cabbies situation.
Imagine the cabbie was a cashed up fella with an awesome cab.
Tweeters, a couple of sub-woofers in the back as well as the boot.
A GPS system that also had a PMP connection for rear passenger entertainment and he was playing David Lee Roth's Hot For Teacher.
Would that be politically incorrect? Or is he meant to be telepathic and realise they are Teachers before they enter his cab?
Great song by the way
Comes from the Album 'Best of Both Worlds':
Please explain.
It's Snake Pliskin said:Here is a good site worth reading:
http://www.politicallyincorrect.me.uk/
Let me paraphrase "Here is a hard right wing site that is full of cr*p and not worth wasting time on."
If you presented the debate in a remotely balanced fashion it might be worth entertaining discussion on. But you're agenda driven and thus the thread is a waste of space imvho.
Mmm... Western secular would have sufficed.Yes it is one of the failings of our language. We are christian and everythng is based on christianity in a very indirect way but we are secular in that religion and state are not one. The way it should be.
Lol.That is the nature of the marxist isn't it?
What we do not need is fascism and the racist diatribe that goes along with that. Doesn't common sense rule out racism?
I disagree.Mmm... Western secular would have sufficed.
Well not really.Marxist doctrine is probably some of the most politically incorrect doctrine I have ever read.
Respect for all with free speech.The problem always becomes, where do you draw the line?
Yes Japan caused a lot of destruction. Most don't know what really happened. A more obscure point of fact is that Korea fails to address their history where it is negative too.I may have an opinion, say, that the Japanese nation is far too proud to realise the destruction it caused the world, and the insincerity and dishonesty it continues to treat its atrocious war crimes and genocides with.
Treat them as individuals based on their deeds. I have conversations with many Japanese about world war two both left and right bent. But I still treat them as they treat me - with respect.It partly has a basis in reality. There are things you can point to in their education system and culture that back this opinion up. But do you treat the individual japanese person with that bias as a basis, or grounding? Or do you treat them as an individual and not hold against them the structure that has shaped them in such a way?
There is education that would help with this. We are told we can't talk about stuff, but do we really know why?To me that is the grey area with political incorrectness in practice. Most people will treat the individual as if they are a representative of that whole. Rather than having a point of view of an individual that takes into account what has made them them, and what they are a product of, and making the judgement in relation to that stereotype, rather than judging them as the stereotype.
Have a listen to any radio talkback program to hear real people's opinions.
Do you? Interesting that you've chosen to express this irrelevant emotion in this thread ... but thankyou for your sudden interest in my financial success or otherwise.I hope the investing / trading is going well for you.
I agree chops.
I treat all on face value.
But I do think the cabbie has every right to listen to carols.
And I believe it to be reverse-discrimination by anyone who says
its not PC to listen to carols at Christmas time on the radio.
Yes, really.Well not really.
Respect for all with free speech?Respect for all with free speech.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?