- Joined
- 1 January 2008
- Posts
- 123
- Reactions
- 0
another one that gives me the shivers:
people that use there/their, your/you're all wrong.
I'm an immigrant and had to learn English but the people that are born in english speaking countries still can't get it right. This is at plague proportions at the moment.
people who post bs about another stock (particularly one they don't hold) for a reason that serves no purpose but to deter others from buying into it.
you know who you are.
only one driving one for me....... it's logical! Your crusing to a red knowing it will be green any moment, so your off the brakes saving fuel & pads, only to find the driver abrubtly overtake and speed up to the red. WHAT FOR, ITS RED!
actually does feel better to have written that.
If something posted in a stock thread can be shown to be factually incorrect, either myself or one of the moderators will happily remove it.
However, if you mean a view that is different to yours, well that's another matter entirely. Differing views are what makes a market. Also, I don't know why it matters whether someone is a holder of a stock or not. Anyone is entitled to discuss any stock and present any view, as long as they can back it up with some factual information or analysis.
If anyone is posting anything that is factually incorrect, and you can demonstrate that it is, then please report the post in question using the report a post feature. Please also report posts that contain no meaningful content.
P
People who write "spelt" instead of "spelled"
tags. You can find out all about them here: https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2737
Rampers.
Spammers.
Those who choose to troll, rather than engage in civil discussion.
That will do for now.
Both are correct.
Re grammar: yes, agree bad grammar is very annoying, but for me the level of annoyance is the context. Here, on a stock forum, I'd expect the participants to be able to spell and punctuate properly.
But if someone is looking for help with literacy (I tutor adult literacy) then they simply reflect usually unfortunate circumstances where they've never been taught grammar, either by parents or the education system.
Another gripe from me is the use of cliches, most notably by the media.
Example: "The 18 year old driver of the car is fighting for his life. How about "doctors are working to save the life of"?
"Following the accident he is confined to a wheelchair.
Lots more where people just can't be bothered to think of something other than a tired cliche. "The ball's in his court", is another particularly irritating one.
Probably you can think of more???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?