Kauri
E/W Learner
- Joined
- 3 September 2005
- Posts
- 3,428
- Reactions
- 11
But great work attempting to shift the goal posts.
Clearly robust argument there.:
.
Same could be said for people in general. Perth is so boring!
I didn't think anything other than pre-mixers were having this massive tax hike.Agreed.....
Now please explain how increasing tax achieves this outcome? The fact is it won't.......
My other point, how many kids do you know drink a glass of red? Still getting taxed....
Cheers
AAHH.. another Dockers trajic... I'm chairman..ooopps.. chairperson .. of that particular club....
What got my knickers in a knot is that the press today were talking about hiking the prices on all booze.I didn't think anything other than pre-mixers were having this massive tax hike.
What got my knickers in a knot is that the press today were talking about hiking the prices on all booze.
... something we all can agree is a bad thing
Before we all get our undies so far up our **** that we start prancing around like Warrick Capper, this increased tax is purely for so the called 'alcopops', or pre-mixed drinks. Alcopops will now be taxed AT THE SAME RATE as straight spirits. Don't worry lads, your six-packs of Cascade Light won't be affected.
news.com.au said:The proposal
The Federal Government's preventive health taskforce made the call for increased taxes following the surprise 70 per cent tax increase on spirit-based alcopop drinks on the weekend to combat teenage binge drinking.
Australian General Practice Network chief Kate Carnell said it was time all alcohol was taxed at the same rate to cut drinking and improve national health.
"We believe the liquor excise should be the based on alcohol content, not what the drink looks like," she told The Daily Telegraph.
Currently beer and wine are taxed less heavily than spirits.
A uniform alcohol tax rate would mean increasing the cost of a beer by 46c and bottled wine by 63c a glass.
I'm beginning to think you just like arguing.Tony Abbot: "I am always a reluctant taxer but certainly increasing the tax, increasing the prices usually [is a] very effective way of reducing the consumption."
DSIC (Distilled Spirits Industry Council) Spokesman: "Normally when the price goes up, sales go down, so it'll have an impact there."
Hmm, price elasticity anyone?
Successful programs use ‘social influence strategies’ to inform students about peer andmedia influence on alcohol and other drug use and provide strategies for resisting this influence. Life-skills training is the best known and most effective of the social influence approaches. It teaches secondary school students social and problem solving skills that focus on decision making and resisting peer and other influences (Botvin et al 1990; Holder 2002; Sanci et al 2002).
Not what was in the press today if you RTFM...
I'm beginning to think you just like arguing.
The point that you, the former minster for health and the DSIC fail to grasp is HOW MUCH consumption will fall per unit of price increase and whether or not that's worth it.
There's also plenty of research to suggest that education does work...
Not entirely surprising. A significant percentage of the listed companies (by number) are based in Perth. It's very hard to work in Perth without working for or with a listed mining company - it's only natural that people get an interest in it.On an aside I noticed that there are a CONSIDERABLE number of Sandgropers who are regular contributors.....what does that tell us???? By the way YES I also live in Perth..hmmmm
*deep breaths*
On one hand we have a government that amidst all the fan fare of the 20-20 summit announced an inclination to simplify the tax system who were elected, partly, on a promise of no increased taxes.
On the other, we have them raising taxes on alcohol while shouting from the rooftops “won’t somebody think of the children!” as if that’s meant to justify it. Anyone who speaks ill of it (as I expect to happen to me) is charged with neglecting the best interests of our children.
What we have here is a systemic failure in parenting and the public outsourcing responsibility to a government all too happy to bolster their coffers with increased taxes.
The reality?
Alcohol has long been proven VERY price in-elastic. Large increases in cost do little to reduce demand.
The cost?
Responsible people, such as you and I, are made to pay even more taxes than we already do for little or no REAL benefit to anyone but a government wanting to ‘look good’ and parents that lack the will to take responsibility for their children.
Governments should be responsible for providing what we as individuals can’t – they should not be responsible for making decisions for us.
Speaking to the employee at the counter and asked what had happened since the hike. He laughed a little and said they weren't going to order half as much pre mixed stuff now, and will be getting in extra spirits in the bottle, as most had simply switched from pre mixers to buying a whole bottle at a time.
So much for promoting the responsible consumption of alcohol - instead of buying a 6 pack of cans, people will go off and buy a whole bottle instead:drink:
The fact that people drive on the left in the UK, but stand on the right side of the escalator. Constantly confusing!Pedestrians who walk on the right
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?