- Joined
- 12 November 2007
- Posts
- 2,944
- Reactions
- 4
Tidal wave of radiation??? your dramatizing.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good yarn do you?
Never let the facts get in the way of a good yarn do you?
Tidal wave of radiation??? your dramatizing.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good yarn do you?
Tidal wave of radiation??? your dramatizing.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good yarn do you?
At least we can live in our homes...
"Over 100,000 Fukushima Prefecture residents can't return to hometowns"
Link
THE MYTH--FUKUSHIMA, was done and dusted on the Share Price charts a week and a half after the event.......
IMO-- Fuku has only had an impact resulting in a temporary excess supply.
Did he say that if 4.6c support fails on the bearish continuation rectangle then your short term target is -
4.6 - (5.0 - 4.6) = 4.2c
View attachment 44566
corn:
Hello Karlos
Did you see this article from PEN's US state Wyoming?
"...The post-Fukushima spot price of yellowcake has slightly recovered, but Pool said the accident is hitting forecasts hard as some countries are choosing to move away from nuclear energy.
“We’re going to lose potentially 35 million pounds a year, almost 20 percent of our current requirements,” he said. “This really dampens down the outlook for future growth of the uranium industry ”” it set us back four or five years.”
...Those advocates will push a move away from nuclear energy and work to slow down the permitting process for new projects."...
Link
Question - As the DFS release now depends on favorable market conditions, will we have to wait another "four or five years" for it's release?...:crap:
Is it Jeremy Fugglesberg who is riding the bucking bronco horse at the top of the article. Maybe after hes finished wooing the hot crountry lasses of America, fire him an email to inform him that his comment "some countries are choosing to move away from nuclear" is actually minor to most countries forging ahead with their development in Nuclear Energy.
PS Some friendly advice Chalea, try avoiding these hick town scaremongering articles written by some hillbilly
Chalea, from the annual report, the top 20 holders have collectively increased their holdings in this company, by several million. Some may have decreased their holdings.
These groups/individuals have a much greater interest in the stock than you and i, and i daresay they are also more aware of the risks and the potential (or not) of PEN. Do you think they are making the wrong decision by continuing to accumulate in these conditions?
Not to bait, I'm genuinely interested to hear your opinion on what those top shareholders may be considering, because it would seem many of them are not expecting the extremely bearish outlook you hold.
you seem to hit the targets you set for the SP in the short term. I'll give you credit for that. Still don't agree with the LT though.
The Casper Star-Tribune reports that Pool says the future growth of the uranium industry could be set back four or five years."
Measured relative to what?
Mind you 3.5 is certainly possible--- even lower
Chalea;647902 25th-July-2011 09:48 PM said:Measured relative to what?
Relative to the distance between current support & resistance
Target if 6.0 support fails = 6.0 - (8.5 - 6.0) = 3.5c (approximately)
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.