- Joined
- 1 October 2008
- Posts
- 3,733
- Reactions
- 391
What is going on here???? Is this stock on the way to the bottom or what!! Any thought's
Uranium well out of favour right now
MB
Anyone got any thoughts about Paladin, given the recent buyin and stock price ?
What recent buyin? The UBS notice? Means nothing
Lots of selling though!
UBS have been in and out of "substantial" holdings. They're bluddy day traders
Ranking 4th in August in terms of total turnover, they're net sellers by more than $1.2M.
Deutsche Bank ($11M), Citi ($10.7M), Credit Suisse ($6M), Morgan Stanley ($3M), and BTA ($1.5M) are ahead of them as significant net sellers. It's onliners like Commsec ($16.3M), E*Trade ($5.1M) that have bought up.
You can draw your own conclusions from that...
View attachment 53989
Where/How did you find out that information about who's buying or selling?
PDN down to 30c now
Somebody ought to tell the POTUS that by far the safest, practically inexhaustible nuclear energy is made inside a huge reactor that's a safe distance away: 150M k's as the photon flies. You don't have to dig and enrich uranium. You don't have to build a string of massive reactors that risk Chernobylling the environment for millennia to come. All it takes is some mirrors or photovoltaic cells spread over acres in deserts, and you capture the energy at practically zero operational costs.As we head towards the open tomorrow, let us reflect on the President-Elect's comments from 2011. Perhaps this will offer insight into the energy policy the new administration will articulate after the inauguration.
Published March 15, 2011 | Your World Cavuto | Neil Cavuto
TRUMP: I'm in favor of nuclear energy, very strongly in favor of nuclear energy. You know, it's sort of interesting. Somebody was explaining if a plane goes down, people keep flying. If you get into an auto crash, people keep driving.
TRUMP: There are problems in life. Not everything is so perfect. You have to look very carefully, though, at really taking care; have the best, the best people in terms of safeguards for nuclear energy. But we do need nuclear energy, and we need a lot of it fast.
http://www.eurasiareview.com/301220...ry-may-fuel-uranium-and-nuclear-sectors-oped/
is PDN becoming a takeover target?
Somebody ought to tell the POTUS that by far the safest, practically inexhaustible nuclear energy is made inside a huge reactor that's a safe distance away: 150M k's as the photon flies. You don't have to dig and enrich uranium. You don't have to build a string of massive reactors that risk Chernobylling the environment for millennia to come. All it takes is some mirrors or photovoltaic cells spread over acres in deserts, and you capture the energy at practically zero operational costs.
Is this a reply to the takeover possibility or are you just making a statement?Somebody ought to tell the POTUS that by far the safest, practically inexhaustible nuclear energy is made inside a huge reactor that's a safe distance away: 150M k's as the photon flies. You don't have to dig and enrich uranium. You don't have to build a string of massive reactors that risk Chernobylling the environment for millennia to come. All it takes is some mirrors or photovoltaic cells spread over acres in deserts, and you capture the energy at practically zero operational costs.
On my screen, it shows the post and poster it was responding to. It starts withIs this a reply to the takeover possibility or are you just making a statement?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?