Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

PDN - Paladin Energy

Re: PDN - Paladin Resources

Plenty of freaked out holders jumping off after it sticks it's head up in the morning.
Still once they go, it may go, if the brokers keep talking up uranium as they have since PDN announced it's upbeat production increase.
 
Re: PDN - Paladin Resources

Uranium well out of favour right now

MB

Driven by public fear all due to poor management of ancient nuclear plants that should have been shut down long ago due to their antiquity. Nothing wrong with modern well run nuclear plants except public fear, thanks to Tepco & Japanese politicians. :frown:
 
Investors and brokers can look for any excuses they like as to why the share price is going down or why everyone should buy or sell the stock but the fact of the matter is, the stock has been declining since 2006 so why should it be any different now?

Trying to figure out the why, when and how... good luck!

The truth is in the price action.
 
Re: PDN - Paladin Resources

Symmetrical triangle breakdown
Target = 80c

View attachment 45602

Great call ! Spot on Chalea, low of 80c. I have been watching this stock closely, seems to be on a sustained uptrend and U price recovering. Keen to buy off the chart trend but i know little about the company management or financial postion. Anyone have a good knowledge of this company and can provide a summary opinion?
 
What recent buyin? The UBS notice? Means nothing

Lots of selling though!

UBS have been in and out of "substantial" holdings. They're bluddy day traders :mad:
Ranking 4th in August in terms of total turnover, they're net sellers by more than $1.2M.
Deutsche Bank ($11M), Citi ($10.7M), Credit Suisse ($6M), Morgan Stanley ($3M), and BTA ($1.5M) are ahead of them as significant net sellers. It's onliners like Commsec ($16.3M), E*Trade ($5.1M) that have bought up.

You can draw your own conclusions from that...

PDN n 23-08-13.gif
 
UBS have been in and out of "substantial" holdings. They're bluddy day traders :mad:
Ranking 4th in August in terms of total turnover, they're net sellers by more than $1.2M.
Deutsche Bank ($11M), Citi ($10.7M), Credit Suisse ($6M), Morgan Stanley ($3M), and BTA ($1.5M) are ahead of them as significant net sellers. It's onliners like Commsec ($16.3M), E*Trade ($5.1M) that have bought up.

You can draw your own conclusions from that...

View attachment 53989


Where/How did you find out that information about who's buying or selling?

PDN down to 30c now :eek::eek:
 
Where/How did you find out that information about who's buying or selling?

PDN down to 30c now :eek::eek:

Sorry TM, I missed your question :(
It's a regular report provided by Pulse, the support software provided by my broker, Open Markets.

PDN BrkRep Oct-Nov 2014.png

I can request it for any time period and sort the result by any column; in the above, I sorted by net value to find the main sellers over the past 6 weeks.
My other software package, Market Analyser 7, alerted me recently that PDN was likely to bounce back up. That's why I thought I'd post an updated chart today.

PDN o 14-11-14.gif

Elliott Wave specialists may like to comment on the wave structure since June:

PDN am 14-11-14.gif
 
It's been a long slide.
Have we found support at last? I guess we might, and I'm again Long one position.

PDN pm 27-10-15.gif

stop if it breaks again below 20c.
 
last posting on this thread was 27 Oct 2015 - thanks to Pixel.
Today PDN published the financial report. It will be blood shed on the price I believe after reading it closely.
Can Trump save the price ? Lets see tomorrow.
 

Attachments

  • pdn financial report.pdf
    852.4 KB · Views: 13
As we head towards the open tomorrow, let us reflect on the President-Elect's comments from 2011. Perhaps this will offer insight into the energy policy the new administration will articulate after the inauguration.

Published March 15, 2011 | Your World Cavuto | Neil Cavuto

TRUMP: I'm in favor of nuclear energy, very strongly in favor of nuclear energy. You know, it's sort of interesting. Somebody was explaining if a plane goes down, people keep flying. If you get into an auto crash, people keep driving.

TRUMP: There are problems in life. Not everything is so perfect. You have to look very carefully, though, at really taking care; have the best, the best people in terms of safeguards for nuclear energy. But we do need nuclear energy, and we need a lot of it fast.

http://www.eurasiareview.com/301220...ry-may-fuel-uranium-and-nuclear-sectors-oped/
 
As we head towards the open tomorrow, let us reflect on the President-Elect's comments from 2011. Perhaps this will offer insight into the energy policy the new administration will articulate after the inauguration.

Published March 15, 2011 | Your World Cavuto | Neil Cavuto

TRUMP: I'm in favor of nuclear energy, very strongly in favor of nuclear energy. You know, it's sort of interesting. Somebody was explaining if a plane goes down, people keep flying. If you get into an auto crash, people keep driving.

TRUMP: There are problems in life. Not everything is so perfect. You have to look very carefully, though, at really taking care; have the best, the best people in terms of safeguards for nuclear energy. But we do need nuclear energy, and we need a lot of it fast.

http://www.eurasiareview.com/301220...ry-may-fuel-uranium-and-nuclear-sectors-oped/
Somebody ought to tell the POTUS that by far the safest, practically inexhaustible nuclear energy is made inside a huge reactor that's a safe distance away: 150M k's as the photon flies. You don't have to dig and enrich uranium. You don't have to build a string of massive reactors that risk Chernobylling the environment for millennia to come. All it takes is some mirrors or photovoltaic cells spread over acres in deserts, and you capture the energy at practically zero operational costs.
 
is PDN becoming a takeover target?
Somebody ought to tell the POTUS that by far the safest, practically inexhaustible nuclear energy is made inside a huge reactor that's a safe distance away: 150M k's as the photon flies. You don't have to dig and enrich uranium. You don't have to build a string of massive reactors that risk Chernobylling the environment for millennia to come. All it takes is some mirrors or photovoltaic cells spread over acres in deserts, and you capture the energy at practically zero operational costs.
Somebody ought to tell the POTUS that by far the safest, practically inexhaustible nuclear energy is made inside a huge reactor that's a safe distance away: 150M k's as the photon flies. You don't have to dig and enrich uranium. You don't have to build a string of massive reactors that risk Chernobylling the environment for millennia to come. All it takes is some mirrors or photovoltaic cells spread over acres in deserts, and you capture the energy at practically zero operational costs.
Is this a reply to the takeover possibility or are you just making a statement?
 
Is this a reply to the takeover possibility or are you just making a statement?
On my screen, it shows the post and poster it was responding to. It starts with
"verce said
As we head towards the open tomorrow, let us reflect on the President-Elect's comments from 2011. ..."
the President-Elect referred to is meanwhile the POTUS.
 
Top