- Joined
- 19 February 2016
- Posts
- 953
- Reactions
- 1,544
I haven’t looked at CHZ closely, thanks for the heads up. Own the rest but out of TIE now. It’s over the peak of the Lassonde Curve. Still early days for PDI on the value path, imo. Unless something significant changes this should by worth over $1b closing in on production.I figured there had been more takeovers in the last two years in Africa but only these 3 come to mind.
On those valuations at the moment I still personally prefer CHZ, ORR and TIE to PDI, but we'll see what the next resource brings. I think PDI has the most resource growth upside, ORR isn't upgrading anytime soon and CHZ is chugging along slowly but has decent upgrade potential.
- Cardinal Resources was taken over by Shandong for cash ~ $85/Resource ounce (AUD) - They had a feasibility study. Probably went too cheap.
- Oklo was taken over by B2 for shares and cash ~ $135/Resource ounce (AUD) - They didn't even have a scoping study from memory and the deposit was crummy.
- Yamana takeover by goldfields for shares fell apart ~ $500/Resource ounce (AUD) - Yamana was a producing company and had copper/zinc/silver as well (I only quickly worked out AUEq, so might be off on that one)
- If you bought Tie on market right now it would be ~$250/resource ounce (AUD) - and they're just in production.
What will it take to move it up the curve and how long? Scoping study not expected until the end of 2023. I thought I read somewhere in one of the research reports that people were expecting 6moz on the next update, but I can't find it now. If that is the case and it comes in lower than it could make for an interesting entry point.I haven’t looked at CHZ closely, thanks for the heads up. Own the rest but out of TIE now. It’s over the peak of the Lassonde Curve. Still early days for PDI on the value path, imo. Unless something significant changes this should by worth over $1b closing in on production.
What will it take to move it up the curve and how long? Scoping study not expected until the end of 2023. I thought I read somewhere in one of the research reports that people were expecting 6moz on the next update, but I can't find it now. If that is the case and it comes in lower than it could make for an interesting entry point.
Maybe I'm mistaken, but has Sprott not updated their model years lately?
View attachment 152500
Compared to the August 2022 estimate, the updated Open Pit Mineral Resource estimate has slightly lower tonnes and similar grade, resulting in reduction of approximately 300Koz of contained gold. These differences are the result of the greater level of drilling data available resulting in a more detailed interpretation being able to be completed. In particular, the infill drilling has demonstrated a greater number of internal higher and lower grade structures as well as restricting the distance that grade shells are extended past the edge of the dataset.
I think it was due to some shifting of the open cut versus underground mining.I'm still reading through the MRE upgrade from a 6 Feb. I missed it as I was on the road.
My first thoughts are, WTF? The last resource was 79.5Mt@1.63 for 4.2M oz.
This is 76.8@1.69 for 4.18M oz.
The upgrade, as expected, was mostly confidence in the resource but they added 335K oz in the underground component up from about 45K. Where did the rest of the extension drilling go? How do you lose about 300K ounces from the open pit...
So, disappointing, to say the least. I suppose when you go from Inferred to Indicated you definitely get a better understanding of the model, but to lose 300K is a very big chunk.
Only real positive is that there's a big chuck of the deposit not included in this between the open pit and the top of the UG model due to a lack of drilling. That will be filled in and add ounces. Maybe another 200k.
But, geesh. I'd be sacking the dudes that did the inferred MRE.
SP being hit accordingly.
Having said that, it's still going to be close to a 5M oz deposit and still cheap on comparison of in situ value compared to peers.
Will be interesting to see what Sprott have to say. I think they'll be very disappointed.
View attachment 152999
View attachment 153000
I think it was due to some shifting of the open cut versus underground mining.
I assumed that the open pit was not going to be as deep, and the original 300k has not shifted, just become part of the underground.
They could also shift the pit a little more to the north West and gobble up some of the higher grades in the initial stages rather than getting those grades two or three years down the track.
Still reckon its worthwhile investing in, particularly with the recent falls in SP.
Mick
Perhaps a bit lucky in the timing.Picked up a few more at 0.165 this morning, seems to be good value at these prices.
May well go lower, but long term it looks the goods.
mick
Well @Sean K the "news" seems to be getting some punters excited. I notice consecutive HVBBs on the charts. Considering a spec position in PDI but seems it may take the rest of the year to "revalue".
Quarterly out, makes some sober reading.
They have 1.4 quarters of cash left, so will have to have a cap raising soon, despite the statement
View attachment 156244
The resource looks good on paper, and if all goes well will produce a lot of gold at a hopefully low AISC, but we will not know any of those projected figures till the feasibility study comes out.
So despite the reassurances , it matters little as to the timing, whether it is in this quarter or the next.
Debt financing is pretty much out of the equation now that credit has been tightened significantly.
The question is, how much of a discount will be offered to the sopistos to get them on board?
Mick
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?