- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,589
- Reactions
- 7,467
PsychopathHow much did George Santos fabricate ? Double -Hamburger with the lot and large fries on the side.
Liar, Liar: Why Republican lawmaker-elect George Santos is in a world of trouble
A Republican elected to Congress in the mid-term elections, Santos has admitted to concocting whole chunks of his biography – his education, his employment and even his heritage. Now, insisting on serving his two-year term, Santos is facing condemnation, calls to step down and possibly ethics probeswww.firstpost.com
The full details of George Santos's lies are outlined here
George Santos’ Long Record of Lies Revealed - DCCC
Right-wing extremist George Santos caught in series of lies to voters A New York Times review of Congressman-Elect George Santos’ resume unveiled even more of the right-wing extremist’s long-running record of lies, deceit, and unanswered questions. According to the report, there was no proof to...dccc.org
Interesting. Notwithstanding Santos' lies, the dccc article tells a couple of porkies too.How much did George Santos fabricate ? Double -Hamburger with the lot and large fries on the side.
Liar, Liar: Why Republican lawmaker-elect George Santos is in a world of trouble
A Republican elected to Congress in the mid-term elections, Santos has admitted to concocting whole chunks of his biography – his education, his employment and even his heritage. Now, insisting on serving his two-year term, Santos is facing condemnation, calls to step down and possibly ethics probeswww.firstpost.com
The full details of George Santos's lies are outlined here
George Santos’ Long Record of Lies Revealed - DCCC
Right-wing extremist George Santos caught in series of lies to voters A New York Times review of Congressman-Elect George Santos’ resume unveiled even more of the right-wing extremist’s long-running record of lies, deceit, and unanswered questions. According to the report, there was no proof to...dccc.org
No surprise here of course.Interesting. Notwithstanding Santos' lies, the dccc article tells a couple of porkies too.
Monumental hypocrisy.
You're missing the point, of course Santos should be rubbed out. But the articles were also full of lies. Ironic.No surprise here of course.
Please.. just point me in the direction of any Democrat candidate who has created such a comprehensive package of lies about their personal achievements to sell themselves to the voters.
--------------------------
What is clear however is that the Republician Party at least takes a very hands off approach to vetting their candidates for election. They certainly don't seem to require any fact checking of things as basic as education, work or ethnicity claims. Basically whatever lies or bullxhit a candidate can say to get elected is fine because in 2022 the Republican party has got over shame as an issue.
They are now officially shameless.
I wonder how the electors of New York who voted for Psycho Santos feel about discovering what a monumental fraud he is ?
I wonder how they feel about a Republician Party that still accepts him as a Congressmen despite the ever expanding litany of lies and alleged business activities George Santos demonstrated?
If people start investigating how many other politicians 'personal stories' will turn out to be 'lipstick on a pig' ?
In any future election how much evidence will be demanded of candidates for their window dressing ?
In what universe will anything Psycho Santos has to say about himself ever have credibility ? I hope he gets sent to Coventry in Congress. IMV he deserves nothing less. ( But then of course we have to look at the 45th Presidents history of relentless lying as the precedent for this .. )
You're missing the point, of course Santos should be rubbed out. But the articles were also full of lies. Ironic.
And I seem to recall Democrat presidents <cough> "embellishing" a few things, none more so the the current one.
This nothing new bas, its been going on on both sides forever. Try a little objectivity bro.
Straw manHey Look at the flying pigs ! Whole flock of them .
Followed by a procession of recent saintly US Presidents ? Amazing what you can throw up when indulging in 'whataboutism"
And again and again you refuse to engage the most salient points I made.
There is no way the Republician Party will rub psycho Santos out of Congress. He won. That is all that counts with the Repubs these days. They will ride through disgrace and like their new protege just call it embellishment and insist he is not a fraud. And they will do it because :
1) The far right Trumpians in Congress will literally die in a ditch to protect their right to have another Far Right colleague alongside them. In fact staying in Congress after such a monumental fraud will move the dial on shameless behaviour off the scales.
2) The remainder of the Republican party have now learnt that they can send in the shock troops to destroy all conventions and they can get away with it. There are no consequences.
Will you get upset and condemn the Repubs if they don't expel Santos and call for another election in the seat ? ( That's an entire squadron of flying pigs crossing the thread)
That in my view is what makes this whole episode so dangerous. I cannot see any equivalent in political history of a candidate winning an election through a complete farrago of lies about their history and then successfully holding their seat.
And by the way exactly what concerns are there about the repudiation of psycho Santos's CV ? Please explain.
Straw man
I'm not a member of the Republican party, not even American. Discussion is for amusement value and I only care insomuch as we tend to import trends from the US.
...and as stated above, its not kosher (pun intended), he should be taken out. So take your straw man and stick it right up your flacid @55
But if you want an opinion from a real grass roots Republican American:
Nice find. Certainly shows the breadth and depth of Psycho Santos. I would repeat my earlier observation. IMV it would make far more political sense for the Republicans to ditch him now and ask for a fresh election rather than waiting for what will be a very ugly investigation that will come up with the same outcome. While he is still in Congress he becomes another distraction that will fester, burst and undermine other lines of Republican attacks on the current administration.Well, the public were told about this guy before the election, but unless the MSM pick up the stories... (Which they would have 15-20 years ago). The beauty of America is that he's better off today for this fraud. Even if he goes to jail he is going to come out and make millions for a Netflix special and dozens of TV interviews and a book deal.
Here is the original story from September casting doubt on Santos from September...
And the 'We told you so" follow-up this week.Santos Filings Now Claim Net Worth of $11 Million
By Maureen Daly Controversial US congressional candidate George Santos has finally filed his Personal Financial Disclosure Report on September 6th - 20 months late - and he is claiming an inexplicable rise in his alleged net worth to $11 million.. Two years ago, in 2020, Santos' personal...www.theleaderonline.com
The Leader Told You So: US Rep-Elect George Santos is a Fraud - and Wanted Criminal
By Niall Fitzgerald In a story first broken by the North Shore Leader over four months ago, the national media has suddenly discovered that US Congressman-elect George Santos (R-Queens / Nassau) - dubbed "George Scam-tos" by many local political observers - is a deepfake liar who has falsified...www.theleaderonline.com
Anyways, the best part is that he reportedly took Russian money.
Biden.No surprise here of course.
Please.. just point me in the direction of any Democrat candidate who has created such a comprehensive package of lies about their personal achievements to sell themselves to the voters.
--------------------------
OPINION>CAMPAIGN
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL
Lies, damned lies and the truth about Joe Biden
BY LIZ PEEK, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 05/22/20 8:00 AM ET
ShareTweet
...More
Nancy Pelosi dismissed Tara Reade’s accusations of sexual assault against Joe Biden. “I know him,” said the House Speaker authoritatively, and that was that.
Does Biden’s record warrant such confidence? Not really. In fact, Biden has a long history of lying — about himself, about his past and about events that never took place.
Democrats want the 2020 campaign to be a referendum on President Trump. Fine, but if this is to be a contest of characters, it is only appropriate that Joe Biden’s history of fabrication and deceit – often intended to bolster his intellectual credentials – also be fair game.
Over the past year, Biden thundered that the Obama administration “didn’t lock people up in cages.” He also claimed that, “Immediately, the moment [the Iraq War] started, I came out against it.” And… “I was always labeled one of the most liberal members of Congress.” Politico’s rating of all three assertions? False.
No one should be surprised. Lest we forget…
A video is making the rounds in which Biden boasts at a 1987 rally, “I went to law school on a full academic scholarship…[and] ended up in the top half of my class.”
Biden also maintained that he “graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school” and was the “outstanding student in the political science department.”
Not one of those claims was true, as newscasters at the time affirmed. In fact, Biden graduated 76th of 85 students in his law school class, had only a partial scholarship and did not win top honors in his undergraduate discipline.
Biden explained in his 2007 autobiography “Promises to Keep” that he had been angry at that rally since “it sounded to me that one of my own supporters doubted my intelligence.” According to a 1987 Newsweek piece, a supporter had “politely” asked Biden what law school he attended and how well he had done.
Biden bristled, saying “I think I have a much higher IQ than you do,” reeled off his fabricated accomplishments and concluded “I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like, Frank.”
The episode reminds us of Biden recently snapping “You’re full of sh*t” at an auto worker who dared to challenge Biden’s stance on guns; or calling an Iowa voter a “damn liar” for insinuating that Biden had helped his son gain access in Ukraine.
The Newsweek reporter wrote that Biden appears “hyper, glib and intellectually insecure,” and says the 1987 encounter was critical to understanding why Biden’s first run at higher office flopped. “The clip…reflects a view of Biden’s character widely shared in the community. Reporters and political consultants long ago concluded that Biden’s chief character flaw was his tendency to wing it. He seems to lack a crucial synapse between brain and tongue, the one that makes the do-I-really-want-to-say-this decision.”
That commentary holds up well, as today more than ever Biden blunders into conversational crevasses, with no way out. (Think: “If they believe Tara Reade, they probably shouldn’t vote for me.” A new Harvard-Harris poll shows 55 percent of the country believes Tara Reade. Game. Set. Match.)
Biden’s 1987 campaign foundered also because he was caught lifting passages of a speech given by Neil Kinnock. Biden echoed (falsely) the British Labor leader’s history that he was the first “in a thousand generations” to graduate from college and repeated virtually verbatim the same story about his wife, just as Kinnock had.
More shocking, Biden claimed: “My ancestors…worked in the coal mines of Northeast Pennsylvania and would come up after 12 hours and play football for four hours,’’ even though no one in Biden’s family tree ever worked underground. That was Kinnock’s family.
It wasn’t the first time; Biden had also been caught plagiarizing during law school. He “borrowed” an entire five pages from a published law review article without attribution and had to beg not to be expelled.
Interestingly, just last summer complaints arose about Biden “borrowing” the work of others, in putting together his climate plan. As Vox reported, Biden’s plan “contains a number of passages that seem to have been copied and pasted, at times with very superficial changes” from a variety of sources.
Biden supporters will dismiss these episodes as being in the distant past. But Biden’s tendency to mislead did not expire in 1988. More recently, the former vice president has told audiences that after his stint in the White House, “I became a teacher. I became a professor.” While it is true that he took a lofty salary to make a handful of speeches for the University of Pennsylvania, Biden has never taught students.
Then there was the inspiring tale of visiting Afghanistan to honor a heroic naval officer. Biden described the officer’s actions in detail, adding, “This is God’s truth, my word as a Biden.” But according to a review in the Washington Post, no such incident occurred. Biden was lucky not to be hit by lightning.
There were also Biden’s claims of having been arrested in the 1970s because he tried to visit Nelson Mandela in prison. Nope, didn’t happen. He has also cast himself as a civil rights activist and co-sponsor of the Endangered Species Act; those things aren’t true either.
Character does not change. Biden’s winning smile and genial nature have granted him license to mislead. But as Biden denies alleged misdeeds related to General Flynn, to his son Hunter’s involvement in Ukraine or to Tara Reade, his history of bending the truth is informative.
Democrats will counter that President Trump frequently exaggerates and embellishes, which is true. But we know Trump; he has been on the griddle for nearly four years, and been continually stripped and flayed by a hostile press.
Many of us are just getting to know Joe Biden.
Biden.
Either you have a screw loose or you haven't kept track of "friendlies"
Astonishing bias LMAO. This just the very first result from "Bidens lies" search
Have fun going through the rest
I don't like any politicians. The majority are self serving tossers that in no way represent us.MoXjo I have no problem recognising that politicians will gild the lily on their achievements. That is the nature of self promotion. Success has many fathers . Failure is an orphan. When Democrats were banging on about Trumps complete disregard for reality finding some mud to throw back was essential
But trying to equivilate the comments about Joe Biden particularly when seen in the context of a long and generally well respected political career against Psycho Santos who has simply made up entire job histories, fabricated all his "educational achievements " and created a Jew-ish history from thin air to appeal to the Jewish community is ridiculous.
And those elements are just the start of his deceptions. MoXjo - if the Republican leaders seriously thought there was some sort of political comparison that could take the heat off their current tacit support of George Santos why aren't they saying it out loud ?
In fact there are strong suggestions that the Republicians were aware that George Santos was not what he claimed to be .
Did Republicans Know About George Santos Before the Election?
The race was neck and neck, but outside Republican groups put almost no cash into Santos’s election race. Shortly after, his biography fell apart.theintercept.com
Well that's a great little troll aint it MoxyI don't like any politicians. The majority are self serving tossers that in no way represent us.
I'm not sure why you are saying that Bidens lies are any better?
He has a huge list of lies that were worse than Santos.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?