Oh ok thanks cynical. 20 people is more than id expect to contribute. Maybe 5 for now. Hopefully that option is still available. Ill also juggle around clients, set rules for lock in periods etc just to prevent destabalisation etc. Thanks for the reply
People get funny when it comes to money. I reckon if you're going to manage your friends' money then you need to be prepared to not just lose their money but their friendship.
That's actually my understanding too, but I was scared off by Ves' incarceration scenarios! Easier to run off to Cayman. I understand that <20 is viable under private placement memorandum without the preparation of disclosure document. There is a limit on the number of people you can solicit from as well. All the PPMs I've seen were numbered and our names recorded as recipients. Here's the link explaining it.
http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/Raising+funds+in+Australia?openDocument
As to avoiding an AFSL, DH70 can achieve this by becoming an Authorised Representative of some organization that has this sorted. Getting an AFSL as a fund manager is upwards of $60k. As a result, fledgling fund managers often piggy back off those who have already gone through it. Gaining an Authorised Representative status requires the AFSL holder to ensure that their representatives are suitable and competent. That could be a show stopper on this occasion.
Here is the relevant clause:
View attachment 58792
So, the local way of achieving the 'desired' outcome is to get some sucker/scammer with an AFSL already in place to whack you on the register as his Authorised Representative, prepare some cut down doco and market it to only 20 people and raise less than $2m. I do not know if this requires a registered trust to house the investments. I think you can get around it by being an 'adviser' or something like that as opposed to the RE and Manager of a registered unit trust. Dunno, but this is achievable in one way or another.
All that failing, here is the exemption from Australian law, in terms of requiring an AFSL, if you were to set up shop in Cayman and investors miraculously turn up to ask you to manage their money as per prior post:
View attachment 58791
Any way I look at this gambit, as the barest minimum, the scale required is an order of magnitude (maybe three) higher than what DH is considering.
Perhaps DH should consider another line of work. This guy invested $20 and grossed over $8k in one night, having the time of his life whilst at it. Further, he got a place in Princeton University:
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/an-NTjcutYbYhtJ2/risky_business_1983_ending/
Ill also juggle around clients
Even went it's all down in black and white! It's all bed and roses until someone loses (or feel they've lost out) then the true colours come out.
So sad but oh so true and for the tiniest amounts too. Spoken from experience.
Cheers, RY.
The grey area for me seems to be that while this is a MIS, it is not required to register because of the limited size. A requirement of registration is holding an AFSL, but I can't find anything that says not being a registered MIS removes the requirement to hold an AFSL. So it's really just an assumption on my part. And when you assume you make an ass of u and me.
Geez this is hilarious. But I'm l(Mc)Lovin this because this was kind of what it was like when we got off the ground. All angles were examined etc. Except we had a little bit of expertise. Anyway, DH70 has no cash to establish an MIS. You also need to get an RE, sort out custody and get a unit pricing registry etc. If before was a challenge, this will blow it further into the ground/stratosphere.
Please see the attached http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/Managed+investment+schemes?openDocument
. It highlights that he can buy/sell shares directly for his clients as previously mentioned. This obviates the need for an MIS in any form. These are termed 'segregated accounts' and all that is required is an Investment Management Agreement and they are off to the races, ponies whatever the f... He's up and running. He can source pro-forma IMAs from IFSA just like an insto (http://www.fsc.org.au/standards-guidance/standard-investment-management-agreements.aspx).
So, to get up and running DH70 or one of his shady mates needs to:
1. Become an authorised rep of some shadier organisation who has an AFSL.
2. Prepare a PPM. That might be as long as a 10 word sentence. "I am good. Give me money. Good luck with that." A short form PPM might be "Gimme money"
3. Market to less than 20 friends in a 12 month period
4. Turn down any accounts or otherwise scale back existing accounts that may bring Quantum Emergence I over the $2m mark, at least for twelve months.
5. Have each of his stupid, shady mates establish an IB or Comsec account. Sign an IMA with names filled in from the IFSA pro-forma, ensure he has access to their accounts.
6. They deposit their commitments.
7. He proceeds to lose their money.
This is real. It can be achieved with very little money if the AFSL license holder is not extortionate. This can be done. In fact, this is how to do it. DH70 was not completely nuts to dream big. He can actually become a hedge fund manager with $1000 and be within the law.
With PI premiums and the political and regulatory environment as they are you'd have to be a special kind of insane to be giving auth rep status to stuff like this at this stage
Term Sheet
Manager: DarkHorse Asset Management Netherlands (hereafter "DAMNED")
Fund: DarkHorse Quantum Emergence I
"Physics states that particles appear within a total vacuum. Why not money?"
Investment Approach: TBA
Objective: High return, Low risk
First Close: TBA
Historical Audited Performance Composite: Confidential
Principals (Years with firm/Total Industry Experience):
DarkHorse70, Founding Partner. Zero Real Life Investment Experience
Unnamed Partner, Founding Partner, Final Year University Student - Law.
Combined investment experience (yrs): Zero
AFSL: Not available - Underground fund.
Minimum Investment: Negotiable
Target Funds: $1bn, with potential for a subsequent $1bn at manager's discretion
Lock-up: At manager's discretion.
Legal Jurisdiction: Not Relevant - Underground Fund.
------
The above is actually what your business looks like right now. Just saying...
. If goldman sachs can bet against its own clients and get away in some fashion the we all can haha.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.