- Joined
- 25 July 2021
- Posts
- 875
- Reactions
- 2,215
well last night was not good so rebound or jumping falling cat?
News that a new COVID-19 variant has surfaced in South Africa spooked global equity markets this past Friday causing a frenzied sell-off.
The question coming into Monday’s open was whether that sell-off was an overreaction and an opportunity – or the beginning of a much deeper, panic-driven sell-off.
My thinking was – if global markets continued to panic and sell-off and it’s discovered the new variant poses less risk than first thought, a major global rally could follow.
And as Monday’s trading session got underway, that’s exactly what we saw, as both the S&P 500 and broad sectors rebounded from Friday’s sell-off.
So, although it appears equity markets have calmed and selling pressures have subsided, at least temporarily, there is still the question of what data investors should keep an eye on for future clues as to the overall direction of the markets.
Let’s start with where investors shouldn’t look for market guidance.
Do yourself a favor – avoid searching media outlets looking for financial advice, which proved to be absolutely worthless during the height of the 2020 pandemic.
Seriously, gain clarity and sanity by stepping away from the financial news network programs. You’ll be glad you did.
Instead, investors should spend their time focusing on what Wall Street is doing with their money.
Follow the money – focus on price trends.
In a previous ADAPT Weekly article, I wrote about small-caps’ attempts to finally break out of a range that they’ve been stuck in since February.
They didn’t. The attempt failed with Friday’s sell-off, which given the circumstances, probably shouldn’t have come as a big surprise.
View attachment 133635
You see, when investors get nervous and head for the exits, it’s typically small-cap stocks that get sold first, while the established household names are held the longest.
As of Friday’s market close, small-caps found themselves back in familiar territory, trading at levels they’ve been stuck in since February.
So, if the risk-off trade were to accelerate, expect small-caps to continue to sell-off.
On the other hand, if Friday’s sell-off was a knee-jerk reaction to the covid news, then small-caps could make another run at a breakout – indicating risk-on is back.
That thesis is still valid as we move into the trading week.
One day doesn’t a rebound make. The media isn’t done with their newest headline and neither are the global equity markets.
Small-cap stocks are only a part of the narrative this week…
A lot of investors haven’t even noticed the relative weakness of small-caps this year because they focus so heavily on large-cap stocks – think Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Tesla.
Check out this chart of the S&P 500 (SPX). The two areas outlined have been important price levels in the past – and we say that price has memory.
View attachment 133636
The 4545-4500 level is going to be important. A break below that level, which is also the September high, would not be a good look for what’s to come. A move back to the 4700 level would show improved demand for large-cap stocks and reaffirm the risk-on thesis.
And what about the DOW? On a positive note, the Dow Jones Industrial Average held up pretty well in the face of Friday’s sell-off.
View attachment 133637
A hold above the 35000 level is the short-term line in the sand. A significant break below that level would indicate that even the biggest of the big are getting sold off – meaning risk-off is the prevailing theme.
So what’s the bond market telling us about stocks?
If stocks are getting sold off as part of the fear trade, that money is going somewhere. That somewhere is often a flight to the relative safety of Treasury Bonds…
That’s why we saw bond yields plunge on Friday. Bond prices rallied and the yield on the 10-Year Treasury moved sharply lower.
View attachment 133638
This is another area to watch over the coming days…
Will yields continue to fall as more and more investment capital flees the stock market in search of safer harbors or will the trend quickly reverse as money flows out of bonds and back to risk-on assets at what looks like bargain prices?
Well, Monday’s trading is a perfect example of what I mean… check out the same chart of TNX after Monday’s close.
View attachment 133639
That’s a huge reversal in yields… it says institutional money – the money we track here at Rowe Wealth Management – is moving out of the safety of the bond market and back to growth assets.
Will it stick or is it just a temporary reversal?
What are we seeing on the sector level is what investors like you should keep in mind.
All 11 stock sectors lost ground during Friday’s sell-off. But which sectors are performing best can give us insight into how the biggest investors in the world feel about risk.
View attachment 133640
Friday’s market action saw defensive sectors like Healthcare, Consumer Staples, and Utilities hold up better than the more risk-on growth sectors.
While the growth sectors, Consumer Discretionaries, Technology, and Energy suffered the biggest losses.
As markets opened yesterday morning the question was: Will defensive sectors continue to lead as this market reassesses the prospects of future growth – or will the growth sectors reemerge as the leaders?
Here’s what sector performance looked at Monday’s close.
View attachment 133641
Technology and Consumer Discretionary stocks lead the market higher. These are the risk-on stocks that are growth leaders.
Interestingly enough, Utilities caught a bid, rising 1.5% on the day. Although Utilities are more defensive in nature, the reason they may have jumped today was the move from bonds back to equities – utility stock dividends replacing bond yields.
So, there you have it, some important areas for you to review as you navigate this week’s markets.
These are the same price charts we’ll be keeping a close eye on to interpret what’s happening at both the index and sector level for any clear signs of a directional bias – risk-on versus risk-off.
So stay tuned for more, and remember…
Follow the price action and always trade based on what is happening, not what might happen.
Interesting fact again?Why the November Jobs Report Is "Fake News"
View attachment 133795
Stocks go up, stocks go down. Investors were treated to another wild intraday trading session as the market jumped higher at the open this morning before plunging several hours later. A weaker than expected November jobs report initially sent stocks higher, due to the effect it could potentially have on the Fed’s taper schedule.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell indicated earlier in the week that the taper might accelerate in response to persistently high inflation. Bulls interpreted last month’s major jobs “miss” (revealed pre-market today) as something that could slow the taper instead.
Only 210,000 nonfarm payrolls were added in November vs. 573,000 expected. At face value, that’s a very weak report.
But the real jobs number was likely much higher last month. It’s just that it wasn't reported accurately due to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) flawed seasonal adjustment model, which is used to screen out seasonal labor swings. For example, during months of uncharacteristically bad weather, the BLS will apply its seasonal adjustment model to construction-related payrolls to smooth out any sudden drops in hires.
The same type of adjustment is made to holiday-related jobs when the Christmas shopping season approaches. Over the years, November has typically seen 200,000 to 300,000 new hires as companies look for help to deal with the surge in holiday spending. The BLS’s seasonal adjustment will remove those jobs from the reporting to offset the spike in temporary employment, which can obscure the job market’s general health.
It’s an approach that makes sense. But during the Covid pandemic, the BLS’s model was thrown completely out of whack. And it’s only grown worse as the economic recovery has stalled.
Case in point, the BLS adjusted November’s jobs number down by a record-setting 568,000 payrolls. The average November adjustment since 2011 has been just 277,000 jobs by comparison.
Even in 2008, following the start of the Global Financial Crisis, the BLS adjusted down November’s jobs number by 389,000. Still far less than this morning’s report.
Without including the -568,000 job adjustment, roughly 778,000 payrolls were added last month. Had the BLS applied its average adjustment of -277,000 jobs, we’d be looking at a post-adjustment gain of 501,000 jobs, just 72,000 jobs away from the consensus estimate.
Wall Street either hasn’t realized this or is simply choosing to ignore it in the face of accelerating inflation.
“The disappointing 210,000 gain in non-farm payrolls in November suggests the labor market recovery was faltering even before the potential impact of the new Omicron variant, possibly as a result of the rising infection rates in the Northeast and Midwest,” explained Andrew Hunter, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.
“Nevertheless, the Fed will still push ahead with its plans to accelerate the pace of its [quantitative easing] taper at this month’s [Federal Open Market Committee] meeting.”
Analysts from investment management firm SouthBay were among the few who correctly identified the reason for last month’s major jobs “miss.”
They said the BLS’s massive adjustment took away from the fact that it was “far from being a weak November” for hiring. In reality, it was a relatively strong report despite missing estimates. Next month, these numbers will improve greatly following the BLS's November revision.
And that, if anything, should only fan the hawkish flames as inflation continues to rise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?