SAE missed earnings expectations, hopefully this is temporary but I do not understand this side of the business enough to be sure.
Now its chinese student being bashed,, and bad publicity for Australian Education once again.
In the midst of strong AUD and declining number of International student, there has been a call to cap the no of student.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/chinese-students-at-risk-in-australia-20120426-1xn5v.html
and
"Gloom with glimpses of light in latest student figures "
BY: BERNARD LANE From: The Australian April 27, 2012 1:58PM
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
SOME universities are in for a tough year with official figures showing the downturn in the number of new overseas students has deepened.
In the year to March, higher education commencements fell six per cent to 52,101, according to Australian Education International. (The key China market was down 6.9 per cent.) "
Latest statistics on International students in Australia.
http://www.immi.gov.au/media/statistics/study/_pdf/student-visa-program-report-2012-03-31.pdf
It shows declining of Offshore student visa application. Which in my opinion is the most accurate measure of trend, rather than measuring onshore student visa application, which my be double counted ie. the same student already in australia is applying to extend his student visa onshore for further study.
This thing has absolutely rocketed to $4.48 from the flat earnings and low of the terrible $2's. I thought it would have stayed down there but obviously not - and it appears the high AUD isn't deterring punters.
I wonder what's driving this? Thoughts?
To my knowledge the SP has risen since a poor report and on the back of no good news. I suspect the stock is seen as defensive. However they'll need an outstanding report, imo, to maintain the current price.
Had a bit of a laugh to myself today, I like to read the market preview on Google news, anyway this morning noticed UBS upgraded NVT to outperform before the open.
I will just continue to hold.
Sp down about 10% today.
Just noise, a bit surprised by the reaction, maybe it was enough of a movement to hit a heap of stop losses
Read what they wrote again. Those statements do not contradict each other if you are implying that. One refers to a temporary delay (caused from the changes) and the other refers to its on-going effect after the initial delays have been cleared.Good or bad?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?