It's extraordinary to think that they now spend circa $130m (and sharply increasing in-line with revenue) each year on what is classified as marketing expenses.
Put it this way, looking at the accounts, if they decided for whatever reason that they did not want to grow, and that they were happy with the current scale, profit would look a lot higher in the short term.
That's a very solid point. If you back out say $65m of that spend (conservatively assuming that some is required for stay-in-business purposes and it is not all for growth), the operating margins go well into the 20% range. Makes for some interesting decisions for the DCF inputs in the later years when growth tapers down...
Hmm... I don't know how you can determine what portion of market expense is "business as usual" vs "growth".
My guess is that the vast majority is in the "business as usual" category. This is because their end customers are transient - students who enrol in a course and stay however long they stay to complete their study. Every semester you need to re-spend all the money to attract the new group of (potential) students. I think this is indicated by the fact that marketing expense has been growing perfectly inline with revenue over the last 5 years.
Incidentally... NVT's top line growth has been consistent. But EPS growth has been pretty flat since 2010, and funny how the share price (after the recent slump) reflects that. This obviously doesn't take into account the dividends that have been paid out.
View attachment 58837
Put it this way, looking at the accounts, if they decided for whatever reason that they did not want to grow, and that they were happy with the current scale, profit would look a lot higher in the short term.
You will note that they do disclose the EBITDA loss on the colleges opened in the current financial year in every investor presentation, however this will not include colleges that were opened in prior years that are barely above break even etc. It can take 3-4 years for some of these colleges to attract the initial 1,000 student inflow a year and start producing a steady profit (there was something on this in the 2009 presentations if I recall). Any student growth past that point is very high margin, indeed.
I don't make these adjustments when doing a DCF, but they do help in seeing where future potential growth lies.
This thing has the power to grow profits via internal generation and has reasonable control over it if the franchise holds. Quite nice, actually. Valuation concerns are to the side. My view is that the reported EPS understates the true EPS if the accounts were re-stated.
I wonder though, with the move to fully user pays style tertiary education, whether the top rated universities will become better funded and thus compete more directly for students. There may even be a sense of premier league not to be challenged through a firm like NVT. Does Harvard go through intermediaries?
FWIW, I took a position @ $4.75. The market was kind enough to offer another opportunity to buy a great quality company at a reasonable price.
Welcome aboard
I hope a man with your outstanding work ethic can find within themselves the laziness required to handle NVT.
Computershare registry question. I was having a look at the NVT DRP before and there are no terms and conditions online that are linked to the registry (there are however some on the NVT site). So apparently that means that you cannot register online through Computershare.
I can't seem to locate the DRP election paper form that I may or may not have been sent by the company. Any idea how to get a replacement copy? Preferable if I didn't have to go through those horrible computer automated telephone prompts that Computershare uses....
Thanks for the encouragement, I guess if I ring now I might be done before 5pm....Otherwise you're probably going to have to talk to the computer..... press 1 to be run around in circles..2 to be cut off. 3........
I eventually got through to a friendly young chap with quite a well imitated Australian accent. He said they will email me a new form within 24 hours. Relatively pain free!Thanks for the encouragement, I guess if I ring now I might be done before 5pm....
Recently received my dividend from NVT. It's small because I brought so few shares the day after everyone else grabed an absolute bargain. Only six of of eight shares I brought have dividends. Maybe when I get the rest of my dividends, might buy more of NVT? Feel happy that I managed to pick at least one very good company (at nearly the right time - only one day too late).
I notice there's a lot of interest and faith in the prospects of this company, especially from respected value investors here on the forum.
Could someone provide a little insight into why they think it makes a good investment at these prices. At an initial glance it's trading on a P/E of 22 and has not grown EPS for the last 5 years. What is going to change in the near future?
Still, I don't see a compelling investment case here. It looks to have performed very well through the GFC growing earnings substantially and has continued to grow revenues since but without any profit growth. Is this because of increased investment? More scale should have translated to a greater profit margin but it has not so far.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?