prs said:Anybody notice that uranium has gone up to $91/lb?
Any comments on the impact?
I don't think any of those factors play a part in MTN getting a lisence to mine. I think that's up to the SA gov after an application is received. Plus, I think getting the lisence to mine is after a BFS anyway, so long time comming I think. And, I'm still not sure if SA are playing the National Labor card on No New Mines at the moment anyway.prs said:I would have thought that with demand for U outstripping supply, with actual auctioning going on for U, with Cigar Lake flooded and probably not capable of production for some years to come, with China trying its hardest to get into Australia's uranium, with ERA with a flooded mine and with the results of the recent drilling at Mt Gee that MTN must surely be qualified to be issued with a licence in the near future. Any thoughts?
kennas said:I don't think any of those factors play a part in MTN getting a lisence to mine. I think that's up to the SA gov after an application is received. Plus, I think getting the lisence to mine is after a BFS anyway, so long time comming I think. And, I'm still not sure if SA are playing the National Labor card on No New Mines at the moment anyway.
Amen to that. I have to say though that SA is not a 'U friendly' State, just because they have 2 operating and one approved. The Honeymoon Mine has been allowed to go ahead because it was approved in 2002 when the Liberal Party was in power in SA. While the current leader may be open to mining, he still has to follow Nat Labor policy.champ2003 said:kennas said:I don't think any of those factors play a part in MTN getting a lisence to mine. I think that's up to the SA gov after an application is received. Plus, I think getting the lisence to mine is after a BFS anyway, so long time comming I think. And, I'm still not sure if SA are playing the National Labor card on No New Mines at the moment anyway.
Thank god for the election coming up so we can all put the speculation over mining in SA to rest. As far as I'm aware its the most uranium mining friendly state in Australia.???
kennas said:Amen to that. I have to say though that SA is not a 'U friendly' State, just because they have 2 operating and one approved. The Honeymoon Mine has been allowed to go ahead because it was approved in 2002 when the Liberal Party was in power in SA. While the current leader may be open to mining, he still has to follow Nat Labor policy.
Canberra, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island, Nowra, and NT. And any Australian embassy overseas.champ2003 said:Thanks guys,
In your opinion whats the most friendly U mining state at the moment then?
kennas said:Canberra, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island, Nowra, and NT. And any Australian embassy overseas.
I agree, not much we shouldn't know already. The effect will be that your next cabbie will be telling you to buy uranium stocks.....Halba said:Those articles are aimed at the average Joe, not much in them really.
Halba said:Those articles are aimed at the average Joe, not much in them really.
prs said:Hey Guys
The board has gone very quiet. What's happening, what are your thoughts about the lack of movement?
mmmmining said:I check the dictionary about a word PATIENT,
1. bearing pains or trials calmly or without complaint;
2. manifesting forbearance under provocation or strain;
3. not hasty or impetuous;
4. steadfast despite opposition, difficulty, or adversity
In last April, someone bought MTN at $1.40. It took 8 long months until last Dec. to be in the money;
MTN just being sideway for a month, I believe you need to hug "PATIENT" for a while.
By the way, MTN will response by this Friday.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.