Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,018
- Reactions
- 11,006
Re: MTN - Marathon Resources
So that's why AGS's deposit has been rated so highly, even before a JORC?
Excellent, thanks for this info, I've always wondered the difference in the type of deposit, but too lazy to investigate it further. Some investor!exgeo said:The poster who mentioned that the grades are higher than 4-mile well is comparing apples and pears. 4 mile/Beverly will be an ISL (In-situ-leach) mine in all probability. This means they only have to drill some wells and inject an acid solution which dissolves out the uranium. A central collection well then extracts the uranium solution. MTN's deposit is hard-rock (haematite breccia) and needs to be physically dug up, necessitating an open pit or underground mine, depending on depth. Obviously this costs more.
So that's why AGS's deposit has been rated so highly, even before a JORC?