This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Not News

My goodness!

Never understood how they pick the winners in these things!

Put very simply, bodybuilders are judged on the overall quality of their muscular development. Judging is based upon the presentation of Mass, Definition, Proportion, Symmetry, and Stage Presence.

Mass:
The perception of muscular size, has been the foundation for bodybuilding since the beginning of the sport. Yet, mass is only a merit when accompanied by the remaining qualities.

Definition:
Indicates the degree of muscularity brought about by the absence of subcutaneous body fat. Defined muscularity is necessary to fully display the development of the physique. Definition is only of value when it allows massively developed muscles to be displayed.

Proportion:
Implies an even balance of muscular development in comparison to each muscle group. Theoretically, a "strong body part" can be just as detrimental as a "weak body part". Bodybuilders must strive for equal development between all muscle groups.

Symmetry:
A misnomer, is commonly used to depict "proportion" or expressed to indicate an aesthetic quality throughout the physique. Although, in its strictest definition, symmetry denotes equal development of muscularity on both right and left sides of the physique.

Stage Presence:
Includes posing performance and other factors influencing general appearance such as skin tone, grooming, charisma, and poise. Effective stage presentation is essential to display the physique to its maximum potential.

Bodybuilding competitions are usually broken down into 3 rounds: Symmetry round, Muscularity round, and the Routine round. During these rounds judges judge the bodybuilders physiques according to the above criteria.

*Please note, this is just a very simplified explanation. Some bodybuilding federations have judging criteria over 10 pages long!

This year's Mr Olympia was one of the most interesting to watch in a long time! (I watched it streaming live). Jay Cutler was definitely the stand out winner. He's a great guy too, I met him a couple of years ago.

 
Put very simply, bodybuilders are judged on the overall quality of their muscular development. Judging is based upon the presentation of Mass, Definition, Proportion, Symmetry, and Stage Presence.

Yeah I realise most of that, just to my untrained eye the winner doesnt always turn out the way I thought. Prime example was Schwarzenegger. Although I had great admiration for him sometimes I just wondered whether the hype was justified. Each to their own I guess.
 

There is A LOT of politics in bodybuilding, and Arnie used this to his benefit. He definitely should not have won the Olympia in 1980. Unfortunately, reputation and sponsors have played a massive role in bodybuilding for a very long time. Being American seems to be an advantage lately too. For quite some time it seemed that you wouldn't win even if you looked slightly better than last years winner. It was as if the previous years winner was given a head start on the score card...

I think it has improved over the past few years, but no doubt being sponsored by Muscle-tech/BSN helps too..
 
Don't know how he did it but it is really well done!
Absolutely incredible!!! It all looks pretty genuine but it can't be real ... can it???

I thought some of those basketball videos you see are amazing but this takes the prize.
 
Yeah I am not sure either but he does initially strike the ball well so he is at least no mug. Not sure who he is.

Remember this clip. It is a fake. It is very cool too. Shows you what they can do with computers these days!

 
Mmmmmm!

Craz-E Burger: bacon, beef and cheese on a donut.


 
I wonder if they have a law that covers this!!!



 
No thread on the tsunami so I will post it here with all my other stuff. Incredible power! If you were in the wrong place at the wrong time you wouldnt have a hope!

............

The FBI has released dramatic footage recorded on September 29th as a tsunami struck American Samoa. The video was recorded at the FBI office in Pago Pago as the water rushed through the parking lot tossing cars and trucks. (Oct. 9)

 
Incredible pictures! Incredible nature in action! Look at this photo carefully. It is a maze of different species on the hunt.

More of his pictures! Jason-Heller's photostream


 
With that many hungry animals around you, wouldn't you be worried they'd consider eating you?
 
Purchasing

The maths on the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce is as follows:

After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million.
Assuming he had sex every night during their 5 year relationship it ended up costing him $26,849 per time.

This is Heather........ below left

Leasing

On the other hand, New York Governor Elliot Spitzer's hooker, Kristen, an absolute stunner charges $4,000 per night.

This is Kristen......below right

Had Paul McCartney "employed" Kristen for 5 years, he would have paid $7.3 million in total, for sex every night for 5 years: A $41.7 million savings.


Value-added benefits are:
? a 22 year old
? no begging
? no coaxing
? never a headache
? happily agrees to all requests
? no complaining
? no honey-do lists


Best of all, she leaves , and comes back when asked. All at 1/7th the cost and no legal fees.

Sometimes leasing just makes more sense.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.bmp
    218.9 KB · Views: 36
  • untitled2.bmp
    239.3 KB · Views: 36
Kristen, an absolute stunner charges $4,000 per night.

Sorry mate, but this is like calling a monaro a supercar. You've managed to choose her best photo, and any fit, tanned girl with sunnies looks great. $4k a night, what has the world come to?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...