- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,645
- Reactions
- 24,537
You have got to be kidding Mt Magnet lol how do you kill something that has been dead for years.
You can't have been there to make a statement like that.
So your saying theres no NG retic in Kalgoorlie?
MT Magnet 2006 census population wait for it...........wait.......ready....456
Awesome example got any more lol.
I can't follow what you are getting at. I think we are wasting taxpayers money putting optical fibre to the home in these towns.
You seem to be agreeing with me.
Mt Magnet population has been decimated by fifo, as for never been there I've lived there on and off for 18mths building a power station.
As to your second statement, I said Kambalda has no NG retic.
Also like I said we will probably waste money putting in N.B.N fibre optics to the households.
Why? The NBN is funded from bonds, which will be repaid by network revenue (not taxation revenue).
Unless there is either a substantial cost blowout .
Shire website has the current population at 750 lol.
Your just digging a deeper hole.
This cost still exists with the NBN since unless it is literally everywhere, having WiFi at home doesn't remove the need to be able to use the device where WiFi is not available.It is horrendously expensive to deliver cellular wireless data. The technology has such a short lifespan that equipment replacement is regular and expensive. Each wireless generation is superseded about every 5 years, meaning regular multi-billion dollar upgrades.
Australia now has its own official visionary.
Senator Stephen Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, has collected his Visionary of the Year award from the New York-based Intelligent Community Forum for his work establishing the national broadband network (NBN).
Senator Conroy was in New York city last week to receive the accolade, using the opportunity to level scathing attacks at Telstra which he identified as a major initial obstacle in the project's implementation.
Advertisement: Story continues below
"The challenge for our government was at the time how do we deal with our incumbent Telstra [...] I gave them two options - they could agree to a prospective structural separation over 10 years [...] if they didn't agree they would be banned from buying new mobile spectrum of 4G services. Telstra's management chose to agree to the NBN."
Good of the govt to use our tax dollars to advertise the NBN -that a lot of us won't even get access to, and plenty won't be able to afford.
Looking at the ads, apparently everyone in the bush is a self employed web designer, commodities trader or white collar professional. Presumably this is how bush folks can afford to pay the NBN rates.
100% of Australians will have access to the NBN, via either optical fibre (93%), 4G-LTE wireless (4%) or satellite (3%).
What's more, NBN pricing is the same nationwide, whether you live on a cattle station in Anna Creek or an apartment on George St Sydney.
That's no way to run a business. It is not surprising that the taxpayers won't get their money back before 20 to 30 years. It reminds me of German war reparations after WW1.
Quigley, the NBN Co Supremo said the government business enterprise was planning to repay the Government’s equity contribution to the project ”” expected to run into the several tens of billions of dollars ”” within a 20 to 30-year time period.
How long do you think it took to recoup the investment in the rollout of power, water, sewer, gas and telephone networks?
Yeah, but there were no better alternatives. Bad analogy.
How is that reasonable? Means people in cities are subsidising the others doesn't it? Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding how it works.What's more, NBN pricing is the same nationwide, whether you live on a cattle station in Anna Creek or an apartment on George St Sydney.
Under the copper network students can access the internet from as little as $20 a month but under the NBN internet service providers face a $24 a month access fee even before retail packages are offered to consumers.
Under the new system an entry level broadband user will face fees of about $60 a month, effectively tripling costs, while mid level plans hover about $90 and high level packages at $110.
What's the better alternative? Make sure you include some supporting refs.
How is that reasonable? Means people in cities are subsidising the others doesn't it? Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding how it works.
Article in the Weekend Australian, with specific reference to cost for students, but obviously relevant to other people on low incomes, extract:
I'm presently paying just $39.95 for a service which is entirely adequate for my purposes and resent any suggestion that this will become much more expensive for something I neither want nor need.
Comments, NBN Myths?
How is that reasonable? Means people in cities are subsidising the others doesn't it? Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding how it works.
?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?